Wu Siyao criticized Jiang Wanan, "I have been mayor for four years and still have to memorize drafts." Luo Zhiqiang said that Shen Boyang wanted to make a comeback in the second debate

Luo Zhiqiang, director-general of Taipei Mayor Jiang Wanan's campaign, posted on Facebook that Taipei mayoral candidate Shen Boyang of the Democratic Progressive Party said he wanted to hold a second debate because he knew he had lost the first debate and wanted to make a comeback in the second debate. He also said he knew in advance that the media would ask questions and it was not easy to answer them clearly. In response to this, Shen Boyang responded that the citizens could rate the answers as they were good or bad. The reason for raising other debates was that there were too many questions that had not been answered before, so this question was easier to answer. Campaign director-general Wu Siyao added that the biggest takeaway from the whole session was that Jiang read and read manuscripts frequently, and the debate seemed to have turned into a "reading conference."

Shen Boyang said that citizens can rate their answers whether they are good or bad. From the beginning until now, they have hoped to discuss the topic. There were quite a lot of media invitations, and there were too many questions that had not been answered before, so I thought this question should be answered simply and see if I could get the answer in a simpler question.

In response to Luo Zhiqiang's criticism and advice, and whether he would initiate a second debate, Wu Siyao responded that "we have been waiting" for whether there will be the next or "N" debates. From the past to the present, we have believed that this is an important municipal debate. If there is only one debate and there is a time limit, there is really no way for the public to fully understand the municipal vision of the two candidates. Therefore, whether there will be other debates, "We have been looking forward to it."

Wu Siyao said that Shen Boyang said from the beginning that this debate is not about who wins or loses, but about letting the citizens see a complete and macroscopic municipal concept. Luo Zhiqiang posted an article in which he imagined that one party would lose before there would be another debate. It was really not a good way to say it. Shen couldn't get Jiang's LINE, "I'll contact Luo Zhiqiang via LINE!"

Wu Siyao mentioned that she was also present today. What really felt like a pity was that Jiang Wanan kept labeling Shen Boyang. Every sentence said that Shen Boyang did not understand municipal administration. But you can think about it. Today's debate seemed to have turned into a "reading conference". Jiang looked down at the manuscript and read the manuscript from beginning to end. If he had to read and memorize the manuscript to explain clearly, who doesn't understand municipal administration?

"This is the biggest learning from the whole meeting." She said bluntly that if you have been the mayor for four years and still have to read aloud with your head down while reading the manuscript, this is not a debate, this is a reading, so she hopes there will be another one.