
吳姓女子懷疑劉姓丈夫與沈姓女子外遇,趁丈夫睡著時偷拍兩人LINE與Instagram對話截圖共93張,並以此告訴沈女侵害配偶權。基隆地院判吳女拘役40日,得易科罰金4萬元,認定隱私權高於配偶權。
AI-generated summary
吳姓女子因懷疑劉姓丈夫與沈姓女子外遇,於去年1、2月間趁丈夫睡著時,偷拍兩人LINE及Instagram對話截圖共93張,並以此作為證據告訴沈女侵害配偶權,導致偷拍行為曝光。劉男隨即對妻子提出妨害秘密告訴。
吳姓女子因懷疑劉姓丈夫外遇沈姓女子,去年趁著丈夫睡著時,偷拿其手機拍攝丈夫與沈女的對話紀錄。事後,吳女對沈女提出侵害配偶權告訴時,拿出該照片佐證,因而曝光。劉男便對妻子提出妨害秘密告訴。基隆地院審理後,認為吳女雖是為保障配偶權才偷拍,但憲法保障民眾隱私權,高於配偶權,故判處吳女拘役40日,得易科罰金。
判決書中指出,吳姓女子因懷疑劉姓丈夫外遇,去年1、2月間,趁著丈夫睡著時,打開他的手機頁面,翻拍丈夫與疑似小三的沈女兩人LINE及INSTAGRAM對話截圖共93張。
事後,吳女對沈女提出侵害配偶權告訴時,民事起訴狀中就將兩人對話截圖當作證據,一併寄給沈女;此舉讓吳女偷拍丈夫手機截圖這件事情曝光,劉男憤而對妻子提出妨害秘密告訴。
法院審理時,吳女一度拿出丈夫的錄音,聲音稱:「手機給你看啊」,佐證是丈夫同意自己可以查看手機。
法官則認為,可以查看跟翻拍是兩回事,雖然吳女是為了維護婚姻,保護自己的配偶權才透過該方式進行蒐證;但憲法保障人民的隱私權,且現今社會幾乎所有成年人均持有手機,並以手機輔以帳號、密碼等,查看及竊錄翻攝他人手機,必可知悉手機持有者多面向隱私活動,因此也應受保障。
法官指出,吳女短時間內接續蓄意打開丈夫手機,翻攝其與沈女的對話紀錄,檢閱大量對話內容,已經嚴重侵犯隱私對話權力。
法官考量吳女是為了維護自身權益,才會違法拍攝劉男的手機對話截圖,但隱私權的位階應優於配偶權,故依觸犯妨害秘密罪,判處吳女拘役40日,得易科罰金4萬元。
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
吳女可能對拘役40日、易科罰金4萬元的判決提出上訴
Possible · Within weeks

A nearly 60-year-old inmate named Wu in Tainan Prison was improperly suppressed four times by the administrator on April 29, 2024 and forcibly handcuffed and shackled, causing multiple abrasions and contusions. He sued the state for compensation. After reviewing the surveillance images, the Tainan District Court determined that the prison's control exceeded the principle of proportionality and ordered the Southern Prison to compensate Wu Nan for a total of NT$31,550 in medical expenses and emotional comfort. The case can be appealed.

The State Council executive meeting passed in principle the Price Law of the People's Republic of China (Draft Amendment), proposing to control low-price and disorderly competition in accordance with laws and regulations. The article elaborates on the core significance of governing low-price and disorderly competition, the effectiveness of governance in recent years, the main contents of the revised draft, and the requirements for supporting rules and platform economic supervision, aiming to guide the market from "fighting for low prices" to "fighting for value, innovation, and services."

A KontraS report shows Indonesia's death row population rose to 639 as of April from 596 in August 2025, raising questions about continued capital punishment rulings despite an unofficial moratorium on executions.

The Supreme People's Procuratorate released a typical case in which many game players were "unboxed" online and were raped online. The Chengdu Procuratorate cooperated with the public security organs to investigate the case, and six defendants were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment for the crimes of infringing on citizens' personal information, picking quarrels and provoking trouble.

Zheng Nan, a cleaning team driver at the Huatan Township Office, was employed more than 20 years ago and was fired three times from 2019 to 2024. Regarding the third dismissal in September 2024, the Supreme Court rejected the township office’s appeal at the end of October and ruled that Zheng Nan won the case and should be reinstated and paid the salary during the dismissal period. The Supervisory Yuan corrected the township office in February 2025, finding that its frequent punishments and dismissals violated the principle of proportionality and procedural legitimacy and harmed labor rights.

A nursing officer surnamed Ye from the Tri-Service General Hospital was found guilty of transferring level 4 drugs for providing sleeping pills for personal use to friends. The military decided to remove him from his post and suspend his appointment for three years. The Supreme Administrative Court believed that the military did not consider the circumstances of the case and regarded dismissal as the minimum punishment, violating the principle of proportionality. It revoked the original sanction and ordered the Third General Administration to impose another appropriate sanction. The entire case was confirmed.