
AI-generated summary
Shao Lida's distrust of the judiciary stems from a traffic negligence injury case in 2018. He was acquitted in the first trial, but was sentenced to 20 days of detention in the second trial. After his appeal in the third trial was rejected, he began to question the fairness of justice.
Taxi driver Shao Lida was dissatisfied with being found guilty. He drove his car into the gate of the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office on September 2 to protest the injustice of justice. After Shao Nan was arrested, the prosecutor ordered him to post a bail of 100,000 yuan, but Shao Nan refused to make bail and was eventually detained. After the prosecutor charged Shao Nan with damaging public property and other crimes, Shao Nan expressed his grievances in the custody court and said that he could not afford the bail. The judge also ruled that Shao Nan's bail should be renewed. However, when the court session was held a few days ago, Shao Nan promised to compensate for his official losses, and the judge also ordered him to post a bail of 100,000 yuan.
September 22 was the hearing court for this case. Shao Nan said in court that he should have been punished for doing something wrong. However, he changed the topic and said that he had brought the judgment to the litigation office. The consultant also said that he "met a bad judge" and considered that the lawyer's fees were more expensive, so he asked him to swallow it. When talking about the excitement, Shao Nan choked up and said, "Our judiciary cannot be like this without right and wrong."
Please read on...
Shao Nan said that the taxi, a tool for making money, had been impounded and he could not post bail. He could not afford compensation for future damage, and he still had a loan on the vehicle. Rather than letting him out, it would be better to keep him in the detention center. He also knew that his actions would have to bear a certain price, but he also said that he had expressed his appeal and the vehicle was impounded, so there was no possibility of committing the crime again.
The judge informed that day that Shao Nan had not received what he believed to be justice, and the risk of committing another crime could not be ruled out. During the investigation, Shao Nan stated that he was unable to afford the bail, etc., and finally ruled to extend the detention for 3 months. He also told Shao Nan earnestly and sincerely that "the judiciary is flawed" and it is not 100% perfect. As a judge, I dare not say that the judiciary is definitely correct. How to face it is Shao Nan's choice, but Shao Nan "chose to face it in the wrong way."
At about 5 a.m. on September 3, Shao Nan drove a taxi with stickers saying "Officials force people to rebel" and "Judiciary is dead" and crashed into the gate of the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office. The door frame of the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office was dented and the glass fragments became unusable. The Taipei District Prosecutor's Office prosecuted Shao Nan for damaging official duties and other crimes.
Shao Nan's distrust of the judiciary stems from an injury case caused by traffic negligence in 2018. He was originally acquitted in the first instance, but the case was reversed after the case was appealed to the second instance, and Shao Nan was sentenced to 20 days of criminal detention. The case was rejected after the third appeal. Shao complained about this and began to question the judiciary.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Shao Lida will be tried by the court after expiration of his detention period
Very likely · Within months

In 2022, a fire at the Meifu warehouse in Taoyuan lasted for 21 days, and Zhengxian Company filed a lawsuit for more than 43.86 million yuan in compensation because the goods were burned. The Taipei District Court held that the cause of the fire could not be confirmed, and there was no way to prove that it could be blamed on the manager. It ruled that Meifu Warehouse was exempt from compensation and the entire case could be appealed.

On the 15th, the Executive Yuan passed the draft amendments to some provisions of the Court Organization Law and related schedules drafted by the Judicial Yuan, and will be sent to the Legislative Yuan for review. This amendment aims to solve the huge caseload and manpower scheduling difficulties by adding the Judicial Affairs Office of the High Court, supervisors and assistant prosecutors of the High Prosecutor's Office, and integrating similar statutory posts to enhance the flexibility of manpower utilization.
According to the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the procuratorial organs prosecuted five officials including Yang Keqin, Zhu Xiaoqing, Wei Daiqing, Liu Yunzhou, and Ban Dairong in accordance with the law. The suspected crimes include accepting bribes, using influence to accept bribes, abuse of power, and corruption.

Chris Tam Fong-chun, partner of the late Abby Choi, testified in High Court regarding a HK$5 million gambling debt. He admitted his former father-in-law intervened to resolve the dispute with Suncity Group, which he refused to pay due to the firm's impending collapse.
The Supreme People's Procuratorate made the decision to arrest Wang Fengchao, former deputy secretary of the Chengdu Municipal Committee and Mayor of Sichuan Province, in accordance with the law. The People's Procuratorate of Changsha City, Hunan Province has filed a public prosecution with the Changsha Intermediate People's Court, accusing him of taking advantage of his position to illegally accept huge amounts of property, and is suspected of accepting bribes.

The People's Court of Chaoyang District in Beijing concluded a labor dispute case in which an employee was dismissed by the company for violating confidentiality regulations because of using a third-party AI tool to assist in office work. It found that the employee's reasonable use of AI did not constitute a violation and the company failed to prove that his behavior caused actual losses. It ruled to revoke the decision to terminate the labor contract and required the company to pay the difference in year-end bonus and other compensation.