The Kuomintang criticizes the DPP for having double standards: inspections benefit the country and the people, but blue committee members are salary thieves?
Quick Look
- The Kuomintang Legislative Yuan caucus held a press conference to criticize the DPP for repeatedly putting forward motions to adjourn the meeting when reviewing the people's livelihood bill, paralyzing the proceedings.
- It also questioned whether DPP legislators' overseas inspections benefit the country and the people, but KMT legislators' inspection tours were smeared as salary thieves.
- This is a double standard.
AI-generated summary
Executive President Zhuo Rongtai recently called on the Legislative Yuan to finish reviewing the budget as soon as possible instead of just adjourning the meeting. However, arranging a lot of inspections will not be of great help to the welfare of the country and the people.
The Kuomintang group of the Legislative Yuan held a press conference today and pointed out that Wu Lihua, convener of the Education and Culture Committee of the DPP, also arranged an inspection today, and that DPP legislator Wu Siyao and others have repeatedly raised motions to adjourn the meeting, hindering the review of the people's livelihood bill. Do Zhuo Rongtai, the DPP and the Green Committee want to apologize?
Kuomintang legislator Luo Tingwei pointed out that the Education and Culture Committee of the Legislative Yuan has been scheduled to review livelihood bills such as the Nutritious Lunch Law, the Early Childhood Education Law, and the E-Sports Law. The DPP has repeatedly proposed motions to adjourn the meeting to prevent the bill from being considered, paralyzing the meeting. It is very regrettable. Kuomintang legislator Luo Zhiqiang also said that important people's livelihood bills are frequently proposed and adjourned. Are the education and culture legislators of the DPP worthy of people's livelihood and education? Fortunately, the Green Committee was lazy and not serious, and the number of people was not enough to succeed.
Luo Zhiqiang mentioned that a few days ago, a KMT legislator went to Jakarta, Indonesia to attend a Taiwanese business event, and was heavily attacked by the DPP. As a result, DPP legislator Zhong Jiabin also visited Indonesia for inspection. The DPP can go abroad to inspect and help Taiwanese businessmen solve problems. Zhong Jiabin also goes there often to cooperate with the government's New Southbound Direction and strengthen contacts with Taiwanese businessmen. The participation of the Green Committee will benefit the country and benefit the people, and the participation of the Blue Committee will harm the country and the people. Is it really necessary to have such double standards?
Luo Zhiqiang said that it is normal for legislators to go on inspections at home and abroad, but under the DPP’s double-standard operation, going out for inspections is a salary thief. So, is the inspection organized by the Education, Culture and Education Committee today a salary thief? Of course not, but what is unbearable is that Luo Tingwei wants to promote the nutritious lunch law and arrange a self-funded inspection trip to Japan to prevent the Legislative Yuan from formulating an inappropriate law behind closed doors, all at his own expense. The DPP actually criticizes him as a thief who pays for going abroad at public expense. Hasn’t the DPP ever gone abroad for inspection at public expense? What's more, it's at your own expense.
Luo emphasized that the committee's arrangement of inspections is the homework that legislators have to do to explore the frontline public opinion. He did not deny that the Education and Culture Committee arranged inspections today, but there should be no double standards; according to the DPP's logic, the budget must be reviewed before the inspections can be arranged, but isn't the people's livelihood bill important? Why did he have to adjourn the meeting? Who was he against? He appealed to friends who care about nutritious lunches, early childhood education laws, and e-sports laws to pay attention. He also predicted that the three laws would be successfully passed in the future, and the DPP would also come to reap the rewards.
Kuomintang legislator Ye Yuanzhi also said that he proposed to amend the law to solve the situation on the frontline of education. He was clearly talking about people's livelihood and education bills, but the DPP legislator only thought about struggle, slander and smear. Is this a blessing to the country? Luo Tingwei emphasized that the DPP said that when the Blue Committee went abroad to solve Taiwanese business issues, it would harm the country and the people, but the DPP itself went abroad for inspections to benefit the country and the people. Zhuo Rongtai said that the platoon inspection was not very helpful to the welfare of the country and the people. The Green Committee also organized inspections. Should Zhuo Rongtai come out and apologize? Wu Siyao called three times to mobilize and adjourn the meeting. She wanted to paralyze the review of the nutritional lunch law, the e-sports law, the early childhood education law and other people's livelihood bills. Do you want to apologize?






