
National Assembly Judiciary Committee requests Supreme Court Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae to appear as witness... The conflict between the ruling and opposition parties intensifies
AI-generated summary
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has not customarily attended the National Assembly, and instead, the Director of the National Court Administration has responded to pending issues. The Democratic Party is demanding the attendance of witnesses, taking issue with Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae's written recommendation to the Supreme Court.
On the 31st, the Legislation and Judiciary Committee of the National Assembly decided to proceed with inquiries on pending issues, including Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae's 'written recommendation' to the Supreme Court Justice and the referral to the plenary body of the appellate trial in the case of former Prime Minister Han Deok-soo and former Minister of the Interior and Safety Lee Sang-min on charges of engaging in important insurrection duties.
To this end, the Judiciary Committee, led by the Democratic Party of Korea, decided at a general meeting on the 21st to request the attendance of witnesses for Chief Justice Cho and National Court Administration Director Noh Kyung-pil (Supreme Court Justice).
Rep. Kim Seung-won of the Democratic Party, the ruling party's secretary, said of Chief Justice Cho and Minister Roh, "I believe that their attitude of ignoring the National Assembly and the President's Office has gone too far. They should attend the general meeting and reveal in detail what they have done instead of hiding behind the curtain or agents."
The People Power Party opposed the adoption of witnesses and left before the decision was made.
People Power Party Legislative Committee members later argued at a press conference at the National Assembly, “Calling the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to the National Assembly to inquire into the circumstances of the recommendation means that the National Assembly will posthumously interrogate the exercise of the right of recommendation entrusted to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court by the Constitution.”
They claimed, “If the Democratic Party wants the truth, the people who should be put on the witness stand are the President and the Senior Secretary for Civil Affairs,” and added, “We hope the Democratic Party will immediately withdraw its unilaterally decided schedule for questioning pending issues and the adoption of witnesses.”
At the general meeting on the 19th, the Judiciary Committee adopted Chief Justice Cho as a witness, led by the ruling party, including the Democratic Party.
At the time, Chief Justice Cho did not attend the plenary session.
Until now, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has not failed to attend the National Assembly as a matter of custom.
Instead, the Director of the National Court Administration (Supreme Court Justice) and executives of the National Administration, who are not involved in the trial, appeared at the National Assembly and responded to pending issues.
Meanwhile, Rep. Kim Seung-won pointed out on MBC radio that the 'imperial system of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court' was the problem in relation to the issue of judicial reform, and said, "The National Court Administration used to be the Chief Justice's task force, but it is necessary to abolish the National Court Administration and change it to the Court Secretariat so that it can only do execution work, and to allow the judges' consultative body to decide on important court matters."
He later met with reporters and was asked whether the bill related to the abolition of the National Court Administration would be passed in this year's regular session of the National Assembly. He responded, "It is time to fully discuss it, and I expressed my personal opinion that we cannot hesitate any longer."
Kim Han-gyu, senior vice-president of the National Assembly Policy Committee, responded to the same question by saying, “That part is not yet being discussed in the party.”
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Conflict between the ruling and opposition parties continues over the Judiciary Committee's request for Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae to appear as a witness.
Very likely · Within days

노웅래 전 의원의 항소심 무죄 판결을 두고 더불어민주당과 국민의힘, 한동훈 의원이 공방을 벌였다. 민주당은 검찰의 조작 수사를 주장하며 한 의원의 사과를 요구했고, 한 의원과 국민의힘은 증거능력 배제일 뿐이라며 맞섰다.

한덕수 국무총리가 서울 지역 21개 구청장과 간담회를 열고 주택 공급 확대와 속도 제고 방안을 논의했다. 정부는 착공 물량 감소에 따른 공급 부족 문제를 해결하기 위해 지자체와 협력하여 가능한 모든 수단을 동원할 계획이다.

Major South Korean newspapers report on significant government financial initiatives, including the creation of large-scale future funds, tax revenue management, and corporate shareholder return strategies amid a semiconductor industry boom.

Expert Ankit Panda warns that President Trump's decision to reduce U.S.-South Korea military drills has created a diplomatic roadblock. He urges both nations to address the fallout to ensure a coordinated strategy for potential engagement with North Korea.

이재명 대통령이 정기국회를 앞두고 오는 28일 더불어민주당 국회의원 전원을 청와대 영빈관으로 초청해 오찬을 갖는다. 민주당 의원들은 인천에서 열리는 당 워크숍을 마친 뒤 참석할 예정이다.

더불어민주당은 '명태균 여론조사' 비용 대납 혐의로 1심에서 직 상실형을 선고받은 오세훈 서울시장이 항소심에서 무죄를 주장하며 변호인단을 늘리는 등 법적 대응에만 몰두하고 있다며, 서울시민 앞에 사죄할 것을 요구했다.