
國民黨台北市長候選人蔣萬安表示已給趙少康打氣,呼籲黨內理性。桃園市長張善政力挺趙少康,質疑因訪問不同政黨候選人就要求開除黨籍不明智,強調媒體應有容納不同聲音的信心。黨中央文傳會主委陳以信則呼籲以大局為重,避免內部紛爭影響選戰。
AI-generated summary
趙少康因兩度專訪民進黨台北市長候選人沈伯洋,引發國民黨內部分人士不滿,甚至有中央委員發起連署要求開除黨籍。
資深媒體人趙少康因兩度專訪民進黨台北市長候選人沈伯洋,引發國民黨內部分人士不滿,甚至有中央委員發起連署要求開除黨籍。桃園市長張善政昨晚間在臉書發文力挺趙少康,直言此舉「非常不明智」,質疑媒體人邀請不同政黨候選人接受專訪,難道就構成開除黨籍的理由,「難道我們對自己的理念,已經失去容納不同聲音的信心?」
請繼續往下閱讀...
台北市長蔣萬安受訪表示,第一時間已給趙加油打氣,希望大家能夠理性,心平氣和。
陳以信:盼同志大局為重
張善政表示,他所認識的趙少康,是正直敢言、始終關心國家前途的媒體人,面對黨內要求開除趙黨籍的聲音,他認為實在沒有必要;他理解面對近期政治局勢,部分支持者難免焦急,但真正有力量的團結,來自彼此的信任。
張善政更以自己為例,指出趙少康日前才專訪他的選舉對手,下週也將專訪他,這在民主社會再正常不過,媒體不應因為訪問不同政黨候選人,就遭到政治立場的質疑。
張善政也向黨內喊話,對自己的理念有信心,對自己的夥伴有信心,不必因為一場訪問而懷疑彼此,政黨應有容納不同意見的成熟與自信,「我們需要更多朋友,而不是把原本並肩同行的人推得更遠」。
國民黨文傳會主委陳以信表示,黨中央絕不樂見黨內同志因此產生紛爭,更不希望在選戰關鍵時刻自亂陣腳。黨中央已派人私下溝通,希望相關同志以大局為重,理性化解歧見。他強調,黨內可以有不同意見,但選戰當前,團結勝選才是共同目標,絕不能讓內部紛爭模糊選戰焦點,讓支持者失望。
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
國民黨中央將繼續透過私下溝通方式化解黨內歧見,避免公開紀律處分。
Likely · Within weeks
趙少康將繼續進行跨黨派專訪,包括下週訪問張善政。
Very likely · Within days

Tainan urban railway undergrounding and the new Tainan Station reached the opening of the first train at 6:30 this morning. Transportation Minister Chen Shikai, Tainan Mayor Huang Weizhe, Legislator Chen Tingfei and others bid farewell to the last train from the old station and boarded the first southbound Xin Ziqiang train from the new station. The Railway Administration pointed out that the project cost more than 41.2 billion yuan, with a total length of 8.23 kilometers, and the elimination of 9 level crossings and other facilities.

The Legislative Yuan passed the amendment to the Elderly Welfare Act on the third reading, which stipulates that the central government will subsidize the health insurance premiums for seniors aged 65 and above whose comprehensive income tax rate does not reach 20%, triggering a backlash from medical groups. Media person Zhan Lingyu questioned whether this was a way to buy votes for the policy, pointing out that premium-free coverage for the elderly would jump from 5% to more than 80%, and the new expenditure would be passed on to people aged 15 to 64, with each person paying more than 3,000 yuan per year. This undermines the spirit of mutual aid in health insurance, increases the financial burden, and may lead to generational injustice.

The new U.S. White House press secretary Zakaria took office less than a week ago. She was questioned due to her lawyer's qualifications trial and poor performance in her first press conference. Foreign media reported that she had been fired. Trump admitted that he had asked her to reconsider the job and said that it may not be suitable for her. White House officials criticized her performance.

Statistics from the Ministry of the Interior show that after Chiang Wanan took over as mayor of Taipei, in addition to a brief increase of 31,205 people in 2023 due to the restoration of household registration after the epidemic, there was a decrease of 21,017 people in 2024 and a sharp decrease of 51,362 people in 2025. The total loss in the two years was more than 72,000. In the first nine months of 2026, there was a further decrease of 20,653 people, bringing the total loss to 92,000 people. The natural increase turned negative and the social decrease continued to expand, indicating that the capital outflow has not stopped and is accelerating.

The Legislative Yuan passed the third reading of amendments to Article 22 of the Elderly Welfare Law yesterday, which stipulates that the health insurance premiums for those over 65 years old whose income tax rate does not reach 20% will be subsidized by the central government. The Ministry of Health and Welfare estimates that among the approximately 4.85 million senior citizens in Taiwan, approximately 4.03 million are eligible for exemption, which requires an annual allocation of approximately NT$40 billion, which is likely to grow gradually.

The House Select Committee on China released hundreds of pages of documents from NSF OIG investigations into unreported cases of research theft, accompanying a report titled 'How to Stop China’s Theft of Taxpayer-Funded Research' that rejects claims by universities that tighter security rules threaten academic freedom. The NSF declined to comment.