
柯文哲涉京華城與政治獻金案一審判刑17年,同案被告端木正與李文娟因二審認罪且按時出庭,高等法院裁准撤銷科技設備監控,兩人仍需每兩週到派出所報到一次,可抗告。
AI-generated summary
柯文哲涉京華城與政治獻金案,一審遭判刑17年,案經上訴,高等法院二審審理中。同案被告端木正及李文娟自2024年8月15日起接受科技設備監控,每天上午10時須拍攝臉部照片上傳監控中心。
前台北市長柯文哲涉京華城、政治獻金案,一審遭判刑17年,案經上訴,高等法院二審審理中。
同案被告、會計師端木正及柯文哲大總管李文宗的胞妹李文娟,因在二審認罪,且均按時出庭,分別聲請撤銷科技設備監控。高院認定兩人已認罪,無繼續監控必要,裁准撤銷,兩人不必再每天上午10時拍攝臉部照片上傳監控中心,但仍需2週到派出所報到一次,可抗告。
端木正、李文娟因涉政治獻金案,自2024年8月15日起接受科技設備監控,每天上午10時須透過個案手機拍攝臉部照片,並同步傳送科技設備監控中心。
柯文哲案今年3月26日一審宣判,端木正因行使業務登載不實罪遭判刑1年,李文娟也遭判判2年4月,兩人及檢方均不服判決提起上訴,高院今年6月裁定,自6月15日起延長科技監控8個月。
李文娟聲請指出,她已在二審坦承共同犯公益侵占罪及違反商業會計法犯行,且年屆花甲,沒有謀生能力,也無逃亡海外生活的財力及背景。
她主張,90多歲的母親近日身體微恙,希望能趁母親有生之年,陪同短期出遊、搭郵輪,盼盡一份孝心,請求撤銷科技監控。
端木正則主張,他自2024年8月起接受科技監控,至今已逾2年,但所涉行使業務上登載不實準文書罪,最重本刑僅3年以下有期徒刑,一審也只判刑1年,持續監控顯不適當。
端木正強調,二審已坦承犯行,且均配合出庭,沒有逃避審判或串證之虞,還須照顧年邁母親,加上已繳交100萬元保證金,無棄保潛逃的必要。
高院合議庭審酌認為,端木正、李文娟經傳喚均如期到庭,顯示積極接受司法審判的意願,且兩人已在二審準備程序坦認犯罪,態度良好。
合議庭考量兩人的生活、家庭狀況及科技監控造成的影響,加上端木正已繳交100萬元、李文娟繳交150萬元保證金,客觀上足以擔保確實到庭,因此認定已無繼續要求每天拍攝臉部照片上傳的必要,裁准撤銷科技設備監控處分。

Chen Yinan, the retired former president of the High Court, was suspected of making 134 illegal searches of personal information. The first instance sentenced him to a prison sentence of 2 years, a suspended sentence of 3 years, and a payment of NT$300,000. After the prosecutor appealed, the High Court today (11th) changed the sentence to 2 years and 6 months. Because the sentence of more than 2 years did not meet the requirements for probation, Chen Yinan must serve his sentence in prison. The whole case can still be appealed.

The Supreme People's Court released a typical case of live broadcast sales: consumers bought fake facial cream on the recommendation of the anchor, and the anchor promised to "compensate four for every fake one". The court ruled that the seller should refund four times the value of the goods, and the live broadcast promoter should bear joint and several liability. The online platform did not bear joint liability for compensation because it fulfilled its audit obligations and did not make a commitment.

The Ministry of Emergency Management announced three typical cases of law enforcement in the field of dust explosions, involving a wood company in Linyi, Shandong, a furniture company in Chengdu, Sichuan, and a carbon company in Baotou, Inner Mongolia. They were fined 45,000 yuan, 45,000 yuan, and 207,000 yuan respectively, and the person in charge of production was fined 5,000 yuan.

The Miaoli County Government reminds that those who violate public security regulations such as damage to the normally closed fire door bows or piles of debris in escape passages will face a fine of not less than NT$60,000 but not more than NT$300,000. In serious cases, they may be subject to consecutive penalties, be ordered to stop using them, or be forced to cut off water and electricity.

Hong Kong became the first overseas base for UNIDROIT in its 100-year history during Legal Week 2026. The Asia-Pacific Liaison Office, based at the Hong Kong Legal Hub, joins HCCH and UNCITRAL offices. The event also covered digital trade reforms, AI governance, and Greater Bay Area legal alignment.

On September 29, 2026, the Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court rejected the appeal at the second instance and upheld the original judgment. It determined that Company A's use of Ms. Wang's voice to generate AI-synthesized speech without her consent constituted infringement, and the company was compensated 50,000 yuan. The court clarified the rules for shifting the burden of proof: if the right holder proves that the voice was obtained through reasonable channels and the synthesized voice is highly similar, the preliminary proof will be completed. After that, the burden will be transferred to the platform.