Ji Guangyang released the rice noodle promotional product order contract to counter the doubts worth 70 yuan
Quick Look
In response to netizens' claims that the rice noodle promotional product was worth NT$70, Taoyuan City 1st District City Councilor candidate Ji Guangyang counterattacked by showing a subscription contract with a unit price of NT$23, and stated that he would file a lawsuit in accordance with the law, accusing malicious reporting and public opinion manipulation with the intention of affecting the election results.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Taoyuan City 1st District City Councilor Candidate Ji Guangyang was questioned by netizens as suspected of election bribery by handing out rice noodle promotional materials worth 70 yuan. Netizens have reported the case and will file a complaint with the Taoyuan District Prosecutor's Office. Ji Guangyang counterattacked by presenting a subscription contract with a unit price of 23 yuan, and accused malicious reporting and public opinion manipulation with the intention of affecting the election results.
Taoyuan City Council candidate Ji Guangyang’s rice noodle promotional materials. (Picture provided by Ji Guangyang)
In response to netizens' accusations that rice noodle promotional items are worth NT$70, Taoyuan City District 1 (Taoyuan District) city council candidate Ji Guangyang counterattacked by showing off a contract with a unit price of NT$23 today. He pointed out that he laid the facts out in the sun and made them clear in black and white. He did not allow interested parties to continue to confuse right and wrong, and attempted to influence the election results through false information, public opinion manipulation, and malicious reports. He deliberately harmed candidates and trampled on the fairness of democratic elections.
A netizen posted on the social platform Threads yesterday (10th) that a rice noodle promotional product with Ji Guangyang's portrait and serial number was sold at a hypermarket for 70 yuan per pack, and questioned him: "Isn't it too expensive for you to give to voters? After all, your property declaration is less than mine!" The netizen later posted that she had reported it and would file a petition with the Taoyuan District Prosecutor's Office.
Tong Guangyang issued a "solemn statement to refute the slander" and pointed out that many candidates in Taoyuan have distributed election materials such as rice noodles, winter noodles, and egg noodles this year. Even the Democratic Progressive Party Zheng Wencan and He Zhiwei jointly launched related materials with Tsai Ing-wen. In the past six months, the Internet army and a group of blue birds have been overwhelmingly smearing, attacking, insinuating and spreading rumors. They have only one purpose, "It is to prevent me from being elected and to make the Blue Army lose one seat."
Tong Guangyang said that a previous Mid-Autumn Festival party in which he did not attend and did not give out lottery prizes was maliciously reported as being suspected of bribery. Assisting the community to apply for garbage trucks should be a service achievement, but was twisted into evidence of bribery. The malicious prosecution has caused unnecessary burdens on the prosecutorial agencies, and has also wasted judicial resources and social costs. It is disgusting to use justice as a tool for electoral struggles! "This is a very malicious attempt to make someone unelectable, and I will sue him in accordance with the law."
Taoyuan City Council candidate Ji Guangyang showed off a contract for ordering rice noodle promotional products at a unit price of NT$23. (Picture provided by Ji Guangyang)
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Ji Guangyang will prosecute malicious reporters in accordance with the law and may promote relevant legal procedures.
Likely · Within weeks
Open Questions
- What is the outcome of the Taoyuan District Prosecutor's Office's subsequent handling of this report?
- What is the specific progress and management number of Ji Guangyang’s legal filing?
- Is the source of the 70 yuan selling price claimed by this netizen true?







