
Submission of appeal to Criminal Agreement 38-2, Seoul Central District Court... Claiming misconception of facts and misunderstanding of law
AI-generated summary
This case was investigated and indicted by the Ministry of National Defense's prosecution team in February, and was handed over to the special prosecution team in April, where the indictment was maintained together. On the 30th of last month, the court acquitted former Director Koo Sam-hoe and former Defense Innovation Planning Director Bang Jeong-hwan, who attended the so-called 'hamburger meeting' just before martial law was declared, saying that the purpose of disturbing the Constitution, which is a requirement for treason, was not proven.
On the 5th, the team of special prosecutor Cho Eun-seok appealed against the first trial acquittal of eight former soldiers, including former Army 2nd Armored Brigade commander (Brigadier General) Koo Sam-hoe, who was indicted on charges of engaging in important civil war missions.
On the 5th, the special prosecutor's team announced that it had submitted an appeal to the Criminal Agreement Division 38-2 of the Seoul Central District Court (Chief Judge Jeong Soo-young, Choi Young-gak, and Jang Seong-jin), which heard the case, on the previous day, citing misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of the law.
The special prosecutor's team explained, "We took into account the fact that the defendants who were found not guilty this time were key commanders who participated in the plot before the declaration of martial law, stayed on duty and waited while maintaining security, and dispatched and commanded troops to sites such as the National Assembly and the National Election Commission, which would never be permitted even under normal martial law."
He then said, "We held a working meeting with the Ministry of National Defense prosecutors and discussed in depth the problems of the original trial, which found all not guilty, and the future direction of maintaining the prosecution in the appellate trial." He also said that he plans to maintain the prosecution in the future as well in the appeal trial.
The case was investigated and indicted by the Ministry of National Defense's prosecution team in February, and was handed over to the special prosecutor's team in April, where the prosecution was maintained together.
Previously, the court acquitted former Director Koo Sam-hoe and former Defense Innovation Planning Director (Brigadier General) Bang Jeong-hwan, who attended the so-called 'hamburger meeting' just before martial law was declared on the 30th of last month, saying that the purpose of disturbing the Constitution, which is a requirement for treason, was not proven.
All former soldiers who were put on trial on charges of deploying troops to the National Assembly, the National Election Commission, and a private public opinion polling agency on the day martial law was declared were all found not guilty.
The court ruled that the purpose of disrupting the National Constitution was not recognized by former Counterintelligence Division 1st Director Seong-woo Jeong, former Special Forces 3rd Airborne Brigade Director Kim Jeong-geun, former 9th Airborne Brigade Director Cho An-seong, former Deputy Director of the National Defense Investigation Headquarters Kim Sang-yong, former Capital Defense Command Military Police Chief Kim Chang-hak, and former Special Operations Aviation Group Chief Kim Se-woon.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
There is a possibility that the special prosecutor's team will maintain the indictment in the appeal trial and result in a guilty verdict.
Possible · Within months

The Special Prosecution Act, which investigates allegations of fabricated indictments by prosecutors under the Yoon Seok-yeol government, is about to be submitted to the plenary session. Cases involving President Lee Jae-myung are the subject of investigation, but criticism has been raised in the legal community that there may be a conflict of interest as the president has the final authority to appoint a special prosecutor.

Former Presidential Security Service Director Park Jong-joon, who was indicted on charges of obstructing the execution of an arrest warrant for former President Yoon Seok-yeol, was sentenced to three years in prison. Because the special prosecutor and the defendant did not appeal, the second trial sentence was confirmed, and former head of the National Security Headquarters Lee Gwang-woo and former head of the Family Security Headquarters Kim Shin, who were also indicted, were sentenced to two years in prison and one year in prison, respectively, with two years of probation. However, former Deputy Director of the Ministry of National Security Kim Seong-hoon submitted an appeal and received the Supreme Court's decision.

Shim Kang Lee Won-hwan, professor emeritus of civil engineering at Yonsei University, who helped the citizens win the case by submitting an appraisal result proving Seoul City's responsibility in the Mangwon-dong flood lawsuit, Korea's first public interest litigation, passed away on February 19 at the age of 96. His disciple Cho Won-cheol, professor emeritus at Yonsei University, reported on the 5th.

The second trial court found former President Yoon Seok-yeol guilty on charges of publishing false information, taking into account the viewpoints of general voters. The court cited the fact that the elector did not personally search and verify past articles as grounds, and sentenced him to 1 year and 6 months in prison with 3 years of probation.

Two current and former executives of the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions were indicted on charges of contacting North Korean agents in China and receiving orders, but were acquitted in the second trial. Seok, former head of the Organizational Dispute Department of the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, who was indicted on the same charge, was sentenced to 9 years and 6 months in prison and 9 years and 6 months of suspension.

The Civil Settlement Division 51 of the Seoul Central District Court ordered that the scope of the deletion request be specified and narrowed in the case where actor Kim Soo-hyun applied for the deletion of 45 YouTube videos of the Garo Vertical Research Institute. The court is approaching the matter cautiously, saying it is a matter in which a criminal trial is in progress.