Li Sichuan Bidding Responds to Su Qiaohui’s Camp Question: Su Zhenchang and Zhang Honglu are the ones who only use single numbers to talk about polls
Quick Look
- Pan Caixuan, spokesman for Li's Sichuan campaign office, responded to the false accusations made by Su Qiaohui camp member Weng Zhenzhou, pointing out that the poll cited by Li's campaign came from the Kuomintang's New Taipei City Council caucus internal poll and the details have been made public.
- On the contrary, Soviet figures Su Zhenchang and Zhang Honglu only published polls with a single number many times during the 2018 election without disclosing the source, confirming that Su Qiaohui's camp has double standards and is accustomed to leading the trend with false polls.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The controversy stemmed from Su Qiaohui camp member Weng Zhenzhou’s claim on Facebook that the internal poll cited by the Lee Sichuan Campaign did not contain information on election and recall laws. Pan Caixuan, spokesman for the Lee Sichuan Campaign, refuted it and gave the example of Soviet figures Su Zhenchang and Zhang Honglu during the 2018 election. They only published polls with a single number without revealing details.
Pan Caixuan, spokesman for Li Sichuan campaign office. (Provided by Li Sichuan Bidding)
In response to Su Qiaohui camp councilor Weng Zhenzhou’s false claim on Facebook that the internal poll cited by the Lee Sichuan Campaign did not contain information on election and recall laws, Pan Caixuan, spokesman for the Lee Sichuan Campaign, said that the data quoted by the Lee Sichuan Campaign were internal polls of the Kuomintang’s New Taipei City Council caucus, and that the caucus had already fully disclosed the poll details in a public way. On the festival, the Su camp did not do any homework before smearing, and once again staged the overturning drama; and by the standards of the Su camp, Su Zhenchang, who ran for New Taipei City Mayor in 2018, and Su Qiaohui's senior legislator Zhang Honglu announced the polls with only one number, and Su Qiaohui boomeranged her father to the left and her senior brother to the right.
Pan Caixuan pointed out that Jiang Yizhen, director of the Li Campaign Office, clearly stated on Facebook that Li Sichuan's 6 percentage point lead in the polls was based on the ongoing internal polls conducted by the New Taipei City Council caucus of the Kuomintang. The caucus has previously disclosed poll details many times, and relevant news can be found by casual inquiries. Su Qiaohui's children are civilian representatives, but they did not even do basic verification work. They rushed to attack Li Sichuan for Su Qiaohui, but they hit his own family hard.
Please read on...
Pan Caixuan said that when Su Zhenchang and Hou Youyi ran for mayor of New Taipei City in 2018, then Secretary-General of the Democratic Progressive Party Hong Yaofu publicly declared at the end of October that based on internal data, the difference between Su Zhenchang and Hou Youyi was only 0.2 percentage points. This action proves that Su Qiaohui’s family members have repeatedly discussed the polls with only a single number, without revealing any details. This is perfectly in line with Su Qiaohui’s camp’s claim of violating the election and recall law. “Excuse me, Su Qiaohui, do you want to report Su Zhenchang and Zhang Honglu for violating the law first?”
Pan Caixuan said that comparing the two, the data cited by Li Jingban had clear sources and revealed the details clearly. It was Su Qiaohui’s own family members, Su Zhenchang and Zhang Honglu, who only mentioned a number but did not explain any details. In order to discredit Li Sichuan, Su Qiaohui’s camp boomeranged Su Zhenchang and Zhang Honglu. Honglu not only showed that the Su Qiaohui camp had no verification ability and had extreme double standards, but what was even more ironic was that in the 2018 election results, Hou Youyi defeated Su Zhenchang by about 14.3%. Comparing the data that the Su camp repeatedly released to the outside world in that year, it proved that the Su camp was a habitual offender who was used to setting the trend with false polls.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Election watchdogs will investigate or issue clarifications in response to disputes over such poll revelations.
Possible · Within weeks
Open Questions
- Have the methodology and sample size of the internal reference polls of the KMT New Taipei City Council caucus been fully disclosed?
- Did the "internal data" cited by Su Zhenchang and Zhang Honglu in 2018 come from the DPP's internal polls?
- What are the specific requirements for the public disclosure of polls under the election recall law?







