Pensioner associations urge government to include pre-2026 pension revisions and remove non-contributory scheme clauses from the 8th Pay Commission mandate.
The Bharat Pensioner Samaj and All India Defence Employees’ Federation are lobbying the Indian government to amend the 8th Pay Commission's terms of reference to include pension revisions for pre-2026 retirees and exclude non-contributory scheme clauses.
AI-generated summary
The 8th Pay Commission's terms of reference were notified in November 2025. Historically, the government has amended the terms of previous pay commissions on multiple occasions.
8th Pay Commission latest news: Pensioners are advocating for alterations to the terms of reference set by the 8th Pay Commission. They propose that revisions to pensions and family pensions for those retired before 2026 be included. Additionally, they urge the exclusion of non-contributory pension schemes from the commission's mandate. Historically, the government has amended the terms for previous commissions, leaving the potential for similar modifications for the 8th Pay Commission in question.
As highlighted by ET Wealth Online, the Bharat Pensioner Samaj (BPS) and the All India Defence Employees’ Federation (AIDEF) have recently written to the central government to amend the terms of reference (ToR) of the 8th Pay Commission and include clauses related to pension and family pension revision for employees who have retired before January 1, 2026.
Both the BPS and the AIDEF also want the government to take out the clause ‘unfunded cost of non-contributory pension schemes’ from the ToR. The clause, the BPS and the AIDEF claim, is a cause for concern among Old Pension Scheme (OPS) pensioners as they think the government is considering them as a liability rather than ensuring their financial protection.
It’s still up in the air if the central government will accept or reject their demand, but the real question is whether the terms of reference of a pay commission can be amended.
Can the terms of reference (ToR) of a pay commission be amended?
The ToR of a pay commission broadly consists of two aspects: areas on which a pay commission will work and factors it will consider while working on these areas. A pay commission starts its work only after the government notifies its ToR. In case of the 8th Pay Commission (8th CPC), the terms of reference were notified in November 2025.
Looking at the past pay commission orders and reports available on the Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance, website, there have been various occasions when the terms of reference of a pay commission have been amended. Here are some of the examples going back to the 5th Pay Commission-
Amendment in 7th Pay Commission terms of reference
The original ToR were notified on February 28, 2014, where the deadline to submit the report was 18 months, but the government amended ToR through a resolution dated September 8, 2015, where the commission was given a four-month extension to submit its report. As per the amendment, the commission could submit its report till December 31, 2015.
Amendments in 6th Pay Commission terms of reference
The 6th Pay Commission ToR were notified on October 5, 2006. But the government made two amendments to the original ToR.
The first modification was made on December 7, 2006, when the government added a clause that it would also govern the structure of pay, allowances and other facilities of the ‘members of the regulatory bodies (excluding the RBI) set up under Acts of Parliament’.
The government made the second amendment to the 6th CPC ToR on August 8, 2007, where it added a clause saying that it would also govern the salary structure of pay, allowances and other facilities of ‘officers and employees of the Supreme Court of India’.
Amendments in 5th Pay Commission terms of reference
In the 5th Pay Commission, ToR were amended not once but four times.
The original ToR was notified in April 1994. The first amendment was made in January 1995 when the government issued interim relief to employees and merged 20% dearness allowance with basic pay for the calculation of gratuity.
The second amendment came in July 1996, when the government provided another interim relief to employees.
In its third amendment in October 1996, the government excluded the members of the subordinate judiciary of union territories from its purview.
In the fourth amendment in November 1996, the government sought examination of different methodologies for the determination and payment of Productivity Linked Bonus (PLB).
The Commission also sought examination of the ad hoc bonus scheme in force in those departments where PLB schemes were not in operation.
With the government amending ToRs of the previous three pay commissions, it will be interesting to see if it amends the 8th CPC ToR and includes the demands of the AIDEF and the BPS regarding the pension and family pension revision for a large number of pensioners.
Data from PRS Legislative Research reveals that 53% of bills introduced in the 18th Lok Sabha were passed in the same session. Many bills were cleared without debate or within five minutes, raising concerns about the lack of parliamentary scrutiny.
Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav defended dynastic politics as a stabilizing force for his party. He also criticized the BJP government over rising commodity prices, ethanol policies, and the state of public education in Uttar Pradesh.
US Ambassador to India Sergio Gor stated at the ET World Leaders Forum 2026 that the India-US relationship is anchored in personal friendship between leaders and robust growth in bilateral trade, energy imports, and defense cooperation.
Former UK PM Boris Johnson joked about his 2022 promise to finalize the India-UK Free Trade Agreement by Diwali. Speaking at the ET World Leaders Forum, he celebrated the reduction of Scotch whisky tariffs and emphasized the post-Brexit surge in bilateral trade.
The Pakistani government has authorized a six-month deployment of three army companies in Rawalpindi for 'sensitive security duties' following a recent shooting incident involving an individual allegedly linked to Imran Khan's PTI party.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian claims global acceptance of Iran's victory over the U.S. Meanwhile, U.S. envoy Tom Barrack faces criticism after stating Israel occupies the Golan Heights in violation of U.N. resolutions, contradicting current U.S. policy.