
AI-generated summary
The conflict between Antropic and the U.S. Department of Defense began early this year when negotiations over the use of Antropic AI technology by the U.S. military broke down. Antropic demanded assurances that its technology would not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous weapons, but the Department of Defense opposed the restrictions on national security grounds.
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Seol Won-tae = Antropic reported on the 13th (local time) that Antropic requested a retrial of the Federal Appeals Court's (Washington, DC) ruling that the U.S. Department of Defense's action designating the company as a 'supply chain risk company' was legal.
Last month, the Washington DC Federal Appeals Court rejected Antropic's request to invalidate the Department of Defense's designation as a 'supply chain risk company' by a vote of 2 to 1, and requested a reconsideration by the full bench of the Court of Appeals.
Antropic argued that the court's majority opinion misinterpreted the law, allowing the Department of Defense to take action "without prior designation procedures and, further, despite direct evidence that the designation was retaliation for Antropic's AI safety-related comments."
Bloomberg assessed that this legal battle has significant implications because the court will decide whether the federal government or private companies will control AI safeguards... .
The fight between Antropic and the U.S. Department of Defense began early this year when negotiations over the use of Antropic AI technology by the U.S. military broke down.
Antropic demanded assurances that its technology would not be used for mass surveillance of Americans or for autonomous weapons by the U.S. military.
However, the U.S. Department of Defense countered that there should be no restrictions on the use of Antropic technology, citing national security issues.
The U.S. Department of Defense's position is that Antropic's AI performs national defense functions, and that preventing the company from using its AI for large-scale surveillance of Americans or autonomous warfare constitutes a "supply chain risk."
The U.S. Department of Defense designated Antropic a "supply chain risk company" in March and ordered all federal agencies to withdraw Antropic-related contracts. This designation was difficult for Antropic to accept because it applies to companies in countries that the United States considers hostile.
Afterwards, Antropic filed two lawsuits against the Department of Defense. One is challenging a Department of Defense directive to federal agencies to stop working with Antropic, and the other is challenging the legality of the risk designation.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
If the en banc panel of the Federal Circuit approves the retrial, Antropic's designation as a 'supply chain risk company' will be reheard.
Possible · Within months
The final ruling in this case will suggest the direction of government regulation of AI companies in the United States.
Likely · Within months

South Korea's Supreme Court overturned an appellate ruling that had sentenced 81-year-old shaman Sim to seven years in prison for her niece's death during a ritual, stating the possibility of intent to kill should not have been ruled out and sending the case back to the Seoul High Court.

The BBC has asked the court to force President Trump to appear in a recorded testimony in a $10 billion damages lawsuit filed against him. President Trump announced his absence due to pending national affairs, and is scheduled to discuss whether to compel the recording of testimony at the federal district court in Florida on the 22nd.

There were conflicting interpretations of legal experts at debates including the People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy on the constitutional issues surrounding the conflict over the nomination of Supreme Court justice candidates. The need to improve the scope of authority and system was raised regarding the President's right to veto appointments and the Supreme Court Chief Justice's right to recommend.

The Korea Women's Human Rights Agency will hold the '1st Digital Sexual Crime Response Policy Discussion' at the Seoul Women's Plaza International Conference Hall on the 14th. The topic of the discussion is 'Measures to strengthen laws and policies for responding to digital sex crimes and victim support systems', and plans are made to examine changes in the distribution environment for digital sex crimes due to technological development and the limitations of the current victim support system, and discuss ways to improve them.

Due to the prosecution reform and major transformation of the criminal justice system that have continued for several years, prosecutors have been resigning in droves, and the annual number of retirees has exceeded 100 for five consecutive years. From January to September of this year, there were 110 retired prosecutors, which corresponds to 4.7% of the total number of prosecutors. In particular, after the inauguration of the Lee Jae-myung administration, the argument for the abolition of the Prosecutor's Office gained strength, and the number of retired prosecutors in 2023 reached a record high of 175, and the number of unsolved cases also increased rapidly, reaching 186,307 as of the end of September.

헌법재판소가 김상환 헌법재판소장의 업무추진비 세부내역 제출을 거부했다. 헌재는 신변 안전과 재판의 독립성·중립성 저해 우려를 이유로 들었으며, 이는 조희대 대법원장의 내역 공개 사례와 대조적인 모습이다.