
Lingang New Area releases the country’s first rules positioning “neutral evaluation” as an independent dispute resolution mechanism
The Lingang New Area Administrative Committee, Shanghai Intellectual Property Office, and Shanghai Council for the Promotion of International Trade jointly issued the "Lingang New Area Neutral Assessment Rules for Intellectual Property Disputes", marking the official implementation of the country's first rules that position "neutral assessment" as an independent dispute resolution mechanism, providing enterprises with an efficient and low-cost new path to safeguard intellectual property rights.
AI-generated summary
Lingang New Area takes the lead in positioning "neutral evaluation" as an independent dispute resolution mechanism, aiming to establish an efficient and low-cost new path for intellectual property rights protection.
China News Service, Shanghai, October 9 (Yang Haiyan, Li Shuzheng) Recently, the Lingang New Area Management Committee, the Shanghai Intellectual Property Office, and the Shanghai Council for the Promotion of International Trade jointly issued the "Neutral Evaluation Rules for Intellectual Property Disputes in the Lingang New Area", marking the official implementation of the country's first rules that position "neutral evaluation" as an independent dispute resolution mechanism. Lingang New Area takes the lead in putting professional forces at the forefront of dispute resolution, providing enterprises with an efficient, professional, and low-cost new path for intellectual property rights protection.
This mechanism is based on the voluntary application of the parties. An evaluation tribunal composed of independent and neutral third-party professionals will conduct a comprehensive evaluation on technical comparison, fact identification, damage judgment and legal application before the initiation of formal civil litigation, administrative enforcement or arbitration, and issue a "Neutral Evaluation Opinion". The evaluation opinions are not used as a direct basis for administrative or judicial enforcement, but they can be used as an important reference for subsequent litigation, arbitration and administrative rulings, and can also help companies "settle their accounts" before making decisions on rights protection.
The four highlights build a “new model” for Lingang intellectual property dispute resolution. First, the system is positioned as the first of its kind in the country and is the first to be tested in the port area. In the past, expert consultation and technical research and judgment were scattered in mediation, litigation and other links. There has never been a set of rules that clearly positioned "neutral evaluation" as an independent dispute resolution mechanism. Lingang writes neutral evaluation into rules, embeds procedures, prepares a good expert database, and connects traditional paths such as administrative adjudication, arbitration, and litigation to form a "Lingang sample" that can be replicated and promoted.
The second is to put professional strength at the forefront, and corporate rights protection has changed from "blind typing" to "clear judgment". The neutral assessment is jointly conducted by senior experts with legal, technical, financial, and industrial backgrounds to help companies fix technical facts early, see clearly the boundaries of rights, and predict legal risks.
The third is Kutodi, a composite expert who specializes in solving the pain point of "unclear technical facts". Promote the recruitment of legal, technical, and practical talents into the database, implement industry-specific and dynamic management, and transform complex technical problems into professional conclusions that can be judged, communicated, and made decision-making.
The fourth is to benchmark against international rules and implement institutional opening up in specific scenarios. The rules are based on internationally accepted rules and practices in terms of confidentiality obligations, avoidance mechanisms, procedural flexibility, and evaluation opinion formation methods. For local companies going overseas, they are a low-cost "rehearsal" field before overseas rights protection; for foreign-invested companies, they are a stable signal that "acting in accordance with international rules" for intellectual property protection in the Lingang New Area.
For enterprises, the core values are "fast, economical, clear and stable". Fast - in principle, evaluation opinions will be issued within 30 working days, supporting electronic delivery and online court hearings; saving - reducing the costs of proof, agency and trial and error caused by blind rights protection; clear - technical facts are justified, liability risks are judged, and settlement plans are based; stable - the entire process is kept confidential and does not block legal relief channels such as litigation, arbitration, administrative rulings, and mediation. It can be embedded in the entire process of case filing, mediation, and administrative processing.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The rules will be officially implemented in the Lingang New Area and the first batch of intellectual property dispute assessment cases will be accepted
Very likely · Within months

Hong Kong commentator Wong Kwok-ngon denied violating the national security law, telling a court that details of his police meeting were already public.

Entrusted by Liuzhou Customs, Guangxi Materials Auction Co., Ltd. will publicly auction a Gui B9U823 Trumpchi commercial vehicle on the JD.com online auction platform from October 12 to 13, 2026. The subject is an old motor vehicle that has been confiscated by the customs in accordance with the law. The buyer must handle the transfer and bear the relevant taxes and fees on his own. The display will be from October 9 to 10, and the location will be at the Liuzhou Customs Warehouse.

The New Taipei District Court held that the murder of his wife and sister-in-law did not meet the "multiple persons" standard specified in Constitutional Judgment No. 8, and determined that the death penalty was not applicable. The New Taipei District Prosecutor's Office argued that "multiple persons" did not exclude two people. Lawyer Chen Junwei supported clarifying the standard through appeal. The victim's father denounced the injustice and hoped that the justice system would face up to the family's pain.

The New Taipei District Prosecutor's Office appealed the case of a man named Xie Wenxiong who hacked his wife and sister-in-law to death on the street in Tucheng last year. It pointed out that the original judgment was too strict in premeditation, the evaluation of cruel methods was too narrow, and it did not fully consider the risk of the defendant committing another crime. It believed that the principle of life and legal rights should be highly protected, and the threshold should not be set based on a fixed number of people.

Li Bodao, the former president of the Correctional Court, was suspected of sexually harassing a female subordinate, and the Judicial Yuan's Sex Assessment Committee previously decided that sexual harassment was established. Li Bodaoti appealed after losing the administrative lawsuit. The Supreme Administrative Court today rejected the appeal and the entire case was confirmed.

In 2024, a Jingshe murder occurred at Shuiyue Caotang in Taipei City. Buddhist writer Wang Xiu was sentenced to 12 years in prison in the first instance. The High Court originally granted a bail of NT$6 million and technological monitoring. However, the Supreme Court revoked the original ruling and remanded it back to the High Court for a further ruling.