Files were combined in the Ahmet Soğuk murder case

The case filed against 3 defendants on charges of incitement for the shooting death of former Ferizli Mayor Ahmet Soğuk in Sakarya was combined with the case in which 4 defendants were tried.

INVESTIGATION CONTINUES

According to the news in AA; The investigation into the death of former Ferizli Mayor Ahmet Soğuk in an armed attack in Sakarya's Yeni Mahalle on July 27, 2024 continues.

SUBMISSIONS AT THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE

Reports of 3 defendants, including 2 suspects whose decision of non-prosecution given by the Ferizli Chief Public Prosecutor's Office was lifted upon objection, were prepared. The summaries were sent to the Sakarya Chief Public Prosecutor's Office.

REQUEST TO MERGE FILES

In the indictment prepared by the Sakarya Chief Public Prosecutor's Office and sent to the 3rd High Criminal Court with the request to merge it with the existing case file, the undetained defendants E.B, D.A.D. and his son M.D. Aggravated life imprisonment is requested for him on the charge of "inciting murder by premeditation".

In the indictment accepted by the court, the defendants who caused Soğuk's death and against whom a public lawsuit was filed are N.E. O.E. MG. and M.F.Ö's crime of "premeditated murder", defendants E.B, D.A.D. M.D. It was argued that it was understood that they did this as a result of their meetings with and the information they received.

DETAILS ARE INCLUDED IN THE INDICTMENT

In the indictment, E.B. with N.E. Contrary to the organic ties and statements between the D.A.D. and the meetings and meetings held before the date of the incident. and M.D's defendant O.E. It was emphasized that the meetings and meetings with the President supported this situation and the following was noted:

"They had such animosity that they decided to eliminate the victim, whom they saw as an obstacle to the realization of their intended interests regarding their real estate in the Ferizli district, after the suspects made the decision to kill, they contacted the defendants with whom they had a close relationship and conveyed their decision to the defendants, they gave the residence information of the victim, the departure time information, the defendants made reconnaissance in this direction, communication was established with the suspects during the reconnaissance and before the action, and the last plan belonged to E.B. It has been understood that what they did was determined."

COMMUNICATION WAS CUT OFF AFTER THE INCIDENT

After the incident, communication between the defendants was seriously interrupted, but M.D. and O.E. It was stated in the indictment that they met near Serdivan Police Station after being detained after the incident, as a result of the basic interrogation, "It was understood that the suspects' defense that they were not aware of the defendants' action was just their expression to get rid of the crime, and in this context, the suspicion is sufficient to file a public lawsuit that the suspects agreed with M.G. and M.F.Ö. through N.E. and O.E. in exchange for money and instigated them to kill the victim by premeditating it." It was understood that it occurred.”

TWO FILES WERE COMBINED

In the case where two files were combined, the trial of 7 defendants, 4 of whom are detained, will continue tomorrow.