
Government lawyers argue restrictions are modest and protect children from depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation.
The Australian government defended its under-16 social media ban in court against a legal challenge by Reddit and the Digital Freedom Project, which argue the law infringes constitutional freedom of political communication.
AI-generated summary
Australia enacted the world's first social media ban for children under 16 last year, prompting similar explorations in countries like France and the UK.
The Australian government has defended its ban on social media use by children under the age of 16 in court, as it faces a legal challenge that could have global implications.
Government lawyers argued on Wednesday that social media use posed several risks to children, including depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation. They described the ban as “modest in extent” and argued that restrictions on freedom of political expression were “indirect”.
The case has been brought by US social media platform Reddit and Sydney-based rights group Digital Freedom Project. They argue that the measure is disproportionate and infringes the implied freedom of political communication under the Australian Constitution.
The country’s highest court adjourned on Wednesday after a two-day hearing and is expected to deliver its verdict in the coming months.
Last year, Australia became the first country in the world to enforce a social media ban on children under the age of 16. The measure prompted several other countries, including France and the United Kingdom, to begin exploring similar restrictions.
A defeat for the Australian government could represent a setback for other countries seeking to follow its lead.
The Australian law bans children under the age of 16 from using several social media platforms, including Reddit, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube. Platforms risk being fined up to 49.5 million Australian dollars ($34.7m) if they fail to take reasonable measures to remove children’s accounts.
Reddit argued on Wednesday that it should not have been included on the list of 10 age-restricted platforms and that the ban was “ill-targeted” and “over broad”.
The judges will now decide whether the benefits of the ban outweigh the restrictions on freedom of political expression.
According to government data published in July, five million social media accounts have been closed since the ban came into effect in December.
However, the government has conceded that many under-16s can still access social media by circumventing age-verification processes. It announced in June it was considering strengthening laws behind the ban, and is preparing an enforcement lawsuit.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
High court verdict delivered
Very likely · Within months

New Jersey's new e-bike licensing and registration law has caused widespread confusion, administrative hurdles, and severe drops in bike shop sales, leading lawmakers to propose rollbacks.

Massachusetts mother Lindsay Clancy, who killed her three children in 2023, is seeking to dismiss murder charges on double jeopardy grounds. Her defense argues the judge mishandled jury deliberations, while prosecutors maintain the mistrial does not bar a retrial.

Australian human rights lawyer Eva Buzo completed an 11-hour swim in Montego Bay to support Jamaican activists fighting against beach privatization and colonial-era coastal access laws.

The Wikimedia Foundation has filed an amicus brief in the copyright lawsuit between The New York Times, OpenAI, and Microsoft. The foundation argues for a balanced fair use interpretation that protects both technological innovation and the availability of knowledge.

German pharmaceutical giant Bayer won a Missouri trial after a jury unanimously rejected claims by three women that the Roundup weedkiller caused their cancer.

Laura Brand, wife of Russell Brand, testified at his rape trial at Southwark crown court. She described him as a caring husband and father, while acknowledging their previous 2007 split due to his admitted struggles with monogamy and promiscuity.