
台北監獄等監所官員涉嫌收賄行賄案,前綠島監獄典獄長蘇清俊等人被控協助受刑人享特權,一審判處蘇清俊16年、王令麟2年2月。經高等法院二審宣判,蘇清俊、王令麟、趙崇智、祖興華、胡曉菁、池燿廷、羅為德等人均獲無罪。
AI-generated summary
台北監獄等監所官員涉嫌收賄行賄,協助特定受刑人享受特權禮遇,包括特別接見、夾帶違禁品及批准公司公文等。一審曾判處蘇清俊16年、王令麟2年2月。
王令麟涉利用旗下協會在北監開辦多媒體創作班、協拍矯正微電影的機會,透過秘書胡曉菁以干貝、茶葉、SKII禮盒、牛排、溫泉酒店住宿券等,行賄蘇清俊與北監主管、管理員,使他在獄中享受特權禮遇。(資料照)
台北監獄等監所官員11年前爆發貪瀆弊案,前綠島監獄典獄長蘇清俊等獄官任職台北監獄時,被控收賄、協助受刑人在獄中享有特權,包括替黑道「喬」特別接見、夾帶違禁品,甚至暗助東森集團總裁王令麟在獄中批公司公文,檢方2015年1月依違背職務收賄、行賄罪起訴23人,一審將蘇清俊判刑16年、王令麟判刑2年2月。案經上訴,高等法院今宣判,蘇清俊、王令麟等全無罪。
一審判決指出,蘇清俊等獄官久居監所職位,竟接受逾越常情的宴飲招待與不當餽贈,讓特定受刑人享受一般受刑人沒有的特殊待遇,破壞公務員執法的可信賴性,嚴重損害監所管理秩序,蘇清俊始終不認罪,北監前科員祖興華、台中監獄前副典獄長趙崇智偵查時認罪、審理時卻翻供,均重判逾10年。
請繼續往下閱讀...
蘇清俊在北監副典獄長期間收賄,利用職權讓王令麟享批公文等禮遇,並在外接受池泳霖、羅為德等黑道人士招待魚翅宴,還長期收受大閘蟹、紅包等,關照池男的小弟。台北地檢署於2015年1月起訴23人,全案審理4年多,歷5任審判長、3任受命法官、5任公訴檢察官,直至2019年10月10日才宣判。
一審北院判決,台中監獄前副典獄長趙崇智判11年8月,北監前主任管理員周秉榮6年10月、前科員祖興華11年、前管理員張文發8年6月,宜蘭監獄前典獄長吳載威、台北看守所前秘書柯書宇、柯妻吳珮瑜等3人獲判無罪。行賄獄官的黑道人士池泳霖(改名池燿廷)、羅為德、高寶勝等12人,各判1年2月至2年6月不等,1人死亡公訴不受理;王令麟與其秘書胡曉菁各判2年2月。
案經上訴,高等法院今宣判,包含蘇清俊、趙崇智、祖興華、王令麟、胡曉菁、池燿廷、羅為德全無罪。
綠島監獄前典獄長蘇清俊曾任台北監獄副典獄長,利用昔日長官威勢,協助身陷囹圄的東森集團總裁王令麟辦理接見與提報假釋。(資料照)
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
檢察署可能會提起上訴再審
Possible · Within months

The Pingtung District Court sentenced a man named Chen, an English tutor, to using his opportunity to teach alone to extend his claws and touch the breasts of a pair of underage female students, constituting the crime of forced indecency and sexual harassment of a girl under 14 years old. He was sentenced to 4 years and 10 months in prison, with an optional fine.

A 50-year-old peasant woman surnamed Chen from Nanshan Village, Datong Township, Yilan County lost her footing and fell off a cliff while working in her vegetable garden. She fell about 70 meters and got stuck in the vegetation on the mountainside. She stayed awake and used her mobile phone to call for help. After nearly two hours of hard work by police, firefighters and tribal residents, she was rescued and sent to the hospital.

On the evening of September 30, a 22-year-old man surnamed Mu claimed to be a murderer and drove to Kaohsiung City's Nanzi Police Station to surrender. The police found the body of a 22-year-old man surnamed Zhang in the rear compartment of his car. Preliminary investigation showed that the two were colleagues of the car dealer, and they allegedly had a conflict over a debt dispute. Mu Nan beat the person to death with a hot gel and turned himself in. The case was investigated by the Qiaotou Procuratorate.

After completing the investigation, the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office prosecuted the man involved, Lin Haoyuan, in accordance with the law, and specifically requested a sentence of one year and six months. Since 2018, Chen Feng, chairman of the overseas business of China Longxun Semiconductor (Hefei) Company, has instructed Lin Haoyuan to set up private operating premises in Taiwan, recruit engineers and sell chips to companies such as Quanta Computer without permission, violating the Cross-Strait People's Relations Regulations and causing Taiwan's economic losses and risk of technology outflow.

A man surnamed Huang mistakenly believed that he had paid 10.8 million yuan in an online investment fraud, of which 4 million yuan was stolen by a defrauded driver during the face-to-face interview. The 17-year-old boy surnamed Lai at the scene was responsible for monitoring and was unable to catch up. The first instance sentenced him and his parents to jointly and severally compensate him 4 million yuan. The second instance was changed to a joint compensation of more than 3.43 million yuan after deducting the statute of limitations and the amount that his accomplices had paid off.

Based on intelligence investigation, the Chiayi District Prosecutor's Office found that Lin Wengzhiyu, a four-term non-party representative of Yichu Township, was involved in purchasing fruit custard apple gift boxes worth 300 to 500 yuan, and instructing his assistants to distribute them to voters in order to seek re-election. After re-interview, it was deemed that he and his assistant were involved in a serious crime of bribery in violation of the election and recall law for public officials. They were ordered to post bail of 80,000 yuan and 50,000 yuan respectively, and the remaining personnel were asked to return.