![Legal Practice" [Criminal Law Classroom] The person in charge of medical beauty was involved in secret filming. What are the requirements for detention and what are the prohibitions on detention?](/api/img?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.ltn.com.tw%2FUpload%2Ftalk%2Fpage%2F800S%2F2026%2F10%2F13%2FphpGvJiSo.png&w=1200&q=72&f=webp)
AI-generated summary
A well-known chain of medical beauty clinics was suspected of secretly filming cases. After investigation, it was found that there were as many as 99 victims, including 4 minors. Prosecutors indicted the group president and related personnel in June.
◎ Facao Sixiang Media
News reports pointed out that in the secret filming case of a well-known chain of medical beauty clinics, as many as 99 people were victims, including 4 minors. In June, the group president and related personnel were prosecuted. The recent detention period was about to expire. After review, it was still considered necessary and the reasons for the detention of these people, and it was ruled that the detention should be extended until February.
The so-called detention refers to detaining a defendant in a certain place with the purpose of preventing the defendant from escaping and preserving evidence to ensure that the criminal proceedings can proceed smoothly. (Taken from the post) What is detention and detention ban?
In news reports, we often see the term "detention ban". What exactly is detention? Under what circumstances will a defendant be detained? And what is the difference between forbidden detention and ordinary detention?
The so-called detention refers to detaining a defendant in a certain place with the purpose of preventing the defendant from escaping and preserving evidence to ensure that the criminal proceedings can proceed smoothly. In other words, detention is a mandatory punishment in criminal proceedings and is not a punishment imposed on the defendant.
Detention can be further divided into general detention and preventive detention.
General detention is stipulated in Article 101, Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Law. If the defendant, after being interrogated by a judge, considers that the suspicion of a crime is serious and there is one of the following circumstances, if it is difficult to carry out prosecution, trial or execution without detention, he may be detained.
This includes cases where the defendant is in danger of fleeing or fleeing; there are facts sufficient to believe that he or she may annihilate, forge, or alter evidence, or collude with accomplices or witnesses; and the crime is punishable by death, life imprisonment, or a minimum term of imprisonment of not less than 5 years, and there is considerable reason to believe that there is a risk of flight, destruction of evidence, or collusion.
In addition, Article 101-1 of the Criminal Procedure Law deals with so-called preventive detention. If the defendant is suspected of a specific crime listed in this article, and the crime suspicion is serious, and there are sufficient facts to believe that he is likely to commit the same crime repeatedly, and if detention is necessary, the court may also order detention.
What is "custodial ban"?
The so-called detention prohibition means that after the defendant is detained by the court, the court further believes that if the defendant is allowed to have contact with the outside world, it may lead to escape, destruction of evidence or collusion with confessions, etc., so it restricts the defendant from visiting, communicating with other people, or receiving objects.
However, the prohibition of interviews in custody does not mean that the defendant cannot have contact with anyone at all. According to the law, he still has relevant rights such as interviews with lawyers.
Does successful detention equal certainty of guilt?
The purpose of detention is to prevent the defendant from escaping, destroying evidence, colluding with confessions, or from recurring crimes, so as to ensure that criminal proceedings can proceed smoothly. The court's ruling on detention only means that the court believes that the legal requirements for detention are met and detention is necessary. It does not mean that the defendant has been found guilty.
Whether the defendant has committed a crime in the end must still be substantively heard by the court and a judgment must be made in accordance with relevant evidence and the law.
Fa Cao also reminded that the next time you see a news report that someone is "detained and prohibited from seeing", you should not directly interpret the detention as "the court has found him guilty." Detention is a compulsory measure taken to preserve the criminal proceedings, while a guilty verdict is the result of a court trial. The two have different legal meanings.
In this case, because there are still discrepancies in the confessions of accomplices and witnesses, and there are many accomplices, it is likely to require a long and intensive trial in the future. The case is still highly likely to be unclear. In addition, the three people had evidence destruction in the past. There is a risk of destroying evidence and colluding with accomplices or witnesses to avoid criminal liability. The original reasons for detention still exist.
Please read on...
This article is reprinted with authorization from "Fa Cao" [Criminal Law Classroom] The person in charge of medical beauty is involved in secret filming. What are the requirements for detention and what is the prohibition of detention?
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
An intensive trial will follow due to the large number of accomplices and discrepancies in witness statements.
Likely · Within weeks
Defendants may face longer detention or additional prosecution
Possible · Within months

Irish author Sally Rooney's books are being withdrawn from sale in the UK due to concerns that royalty payments could potentially violate anti-terrorism legislation.

The High Court will hear the case involving former Taipei Mayor Ko Wenzhe involving Beijing City and political donations today. Li Wenzong, the former chairman of the Zhongwang Foundation, pleaded guilty to breach of trust, while Li Wenjuan, the former head of Muke Public Relations, stated in court that he had pleaded guilty to all the guilty parts in the first instance verdict and would no longer argue.
A 12-year-old girl, Xiaoya, pretended to be an adult and registered an account on a live voice broadcast app and made a high reward of more than 110,000 yuan. The Guangzhou Internet Court concluded the dispute and determined that the platform had made major mistakes. The final judgment was that the platform should refund more than 90,000 yuan at a rate of 85%.

The Maritime Circuit Court jointly established by the Yantai Coast Guard and the Yantai Intermediate People's Court in Shandong Province was recently inaugurated and put into operation in Yantai. It is the country's first circuit trial carrier set up on a Coast Guard law enforcement vessel. It has also been launched at the Joint Resolution Center for Maritime Conflicts and Disputes. It aims to solve problems such as difficulty in obtaining evidence and delivery of evidence in maritime disputes, and promote the resolution of conflicts before litigation.

Recently, public security in Sichuan, Shanxi and other places have uncovered major cases of illegal reselling of students' personal information. On campus, ghosts exported data in violation of regulations, operation and maintenance personnel were on guard to steal, and intermediaries resold it layer by layer. After testing a number of campus dating apps, the reporter received a large number of harassing calls regarding credit and part-time jobs. The interviewed students and parents reported that the leakage of personal information has led to precision marketing and fraud and harassment, and the information chain involves schools, platforms, training institutions and fraud gangs. Experts recommend building a full-process closed-loop governance system to strengthen department coordination and system improvement.

The 2026 CIETAC Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Dispute Resolution Summit Forum opened in Hong Kong. Hong Kong's Secretary for Justice, Lam Ting-kwok, said that he planned to set up a task force at the end of the year or early next year to deepen the connection of rules and mechanisms in the Greater Bay Area, and emphasized that he would continue to improve cross-border judicial assistance and arbitration services and consolidate Hong Kong's dispute resolution advantages.