
知名連鎖醫美診所偷拍案被害者達99人,含4名未成年者。檢方於6月間起訴集團總裁及相關人員,原羈押禁見將屆滿,法院認被告有逃亡、滅證或串供之虞,裁定延長羈押禁見2月,並解釋羈押與羈押禁見的法律意義及區別。
AI-generated summary
知名連鎖醫美診所涉嫌偷拍案件,經調查發現被害者高達99人,其中包括4名未成年者。檢方於6月間起訴集團總裁及相關人員。
◎ 法操司想傳媒
新聞報導指出,知名連鎖醫美診所偷拍案,經調查被害者高達99人,含4名未成年者,6月間依起訴集團總裁及相關人員;近期羈押期間即將屆滿,經評議後仍認為該等人有羈押必要及原因,裁定延長羈押禁見2月。
所謂的羈押,是指將被告拘禁於一定場所,目的在於防止被告逃亡、保全證據,以確保刑事訴訟程序能夠順利進行。(取自貼文)什麼是羈押與羈押禁見?
在新聞報導中,時常可以看到「羈押禁見」這個詞,究竟什麼是羈押?什麼情況下被告會遭到羈押?而羈押禁見又和一般羈押有什麼不同?
所謂的羈押,是指將被告拘禁於一定場所,目的在於防止被告逃亡、保全證據,以確保刑事訴訟程序能夠順利進行。也就是說,羈押是一種刑事訴訟上的強制處分,並不是對被告所判處的刑罰。
羈押又可分為一般性羈押及預防性羈押
一般性羈押規定在刑事訴訟法第101條第1項,被告經法官訊問後,認為犯罪嫌疑重大,而且有下列情形之一,非予羈押,顯難進行追訴、審判或執行者,得羈押之。
包括被告有逃亡或逃亡之虞;有事實足認為可能湮滅、偽造、變造證據,或勾串共犯、證人;以及所犯為死刑、無期徒刑或最輕本刑5年以上有期徒刑之罪,並有相當理由認為有逃亡、滅證或串供之虞。
另外,刑事訴訟法第101條之1則是針對所謂的預防性羈押。如果被告涉嫌該條所列的特定犯罪,且犯罪嫌疑重大,有事實足認為有反覆實行同一犯罪之虞,而有羈押必要時,法院也可以裁定羈押。
什麼是「羈押禁見」?
所謂羈押禁見,是指被告遭法院裁定羈押後,法院進一步認為如果讓被告與外界接觸,可能造成逃亡、滅證或串供等情形,因此限制被告與其他人接見、通信或受授物件。
不過,羈押禁見並不代表被告完全不能與任何人接觸,依法仍有律師接見等相關權利。
羈押成功就等於有罪確定嗎?
羈押的目的,是為了防止被告逃亡、滅證、串供,或避免犯罪反覆發生,以確保刑事訴訟程序能夠順利進行。法院裁定羈押,只代表法院認為目前符合羈押的法律要件,並有羈押的必要,並不代表被告已經被認定有罪。
被告最後究竟有沒有犯罪,仍然必須經過法院實質審理,依照相關證據及法律作成判決。
法操也提醒,下次看到新聞報導某人「遭羈押禁見」時,不能直接將羈押理解成「法院已經認定他有罪」。羈押是為了保全刑事訴訟程序所採取的強制處分,而有罪判決則是法院經過審理後所作成的結果,兩者在法律上的意義並不相同。
這起案件,因為同案共犯及證人供述仍有差異、共犯甚多,未來很可能須長時間、密集進行審理,案情仍有晦暗不明高度可能,再加上3人之前有滅證事實,不無為躲避刑責而湮滅證據、勾串共犯或證人之虞,原羈押原因仍存在。
請繼續往下閱讀...
本文經授權轉載自法操》【刑法小教室】醫美負責人涉偷拍,羈押有什麼要件,什麼是羈押禁見?
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
後續將進行密集審理,因共犯眾多及證人供述有差異
Likely · Within weeks
被告可能面臨更長期的羈押或追加起訴
Possible · Within months

Irish author Sally Rooney's books are being withdrawn from sale in the UK due to concerns that royalty payments could potentially violate anti-terrorism legislation.

The High Court will hear the case involving former Taipei Mayor Ko Wenzhe involving Beijing City and political donations today. Li Wenzong, the former chairman of the Zhongwang Foundation, pleaded guilty to breach of trust, while Li Wenjuan, the former head of Muke Public Relations, stated in court that he had pleaded guilty to all the guilty parts in the first instance verdict and would no longer argue.
A 12-year-old girl, Xiaoya, pretended to be an adult and registered an account on a live voice broadcast app and made a high reward of more than 110,000 yuan. The Guangzhou Internet Court concluded the dispute and determined that the platform had made major mistakes. The final judgment was that the platform should refund more than 90,000 yuan at a rate of 85%.

The Maritime Circuit Court jointly established by the Yantai Coast Guard and the Yantai Intermediate People's Court in Shandong Province was recently inaugurated and put into operation in Yantai. It is the country's first circuit trial carrier set up on a Coast Guard law enforcement vessel. It has also been launched at the Joint Resolution Center for Maritime Conflicts and Disputes. It aims to solve problems such as difficulty in obtaining evidence and delivery of evidence in maritime disputes, and promote the resolution of conflicts before litigation.

Recently, public security in Sichuan, Shanxi and other places have uncovered major cases of illegal reselling of students' personal information. On campus, ghosts exported data in violation of regulations, operation and maintenance personnel were on guard to steal, and intermediaries resold it layer by layer. After testing a number of campus dating apps, the reporter received a large number of harassing calls regarding credit and part-time jobs. The interviewed students and parents reported that the leakage of personal information has led to precision marketing and fraud and harassment, and the information chain involves schools, platforms, training institutions and fraud gangs. Experts recommend building a full-process closed-loop governance system to strengthen department coordination and system improvement.

The 2026 CIETAC Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Dispute Resolution Summit Forum opened in Hong Kong. Hong Kong's Secretary for Justice, Lam Ting-kwok, said that he planned to set up a task force at the end of the year or early next year to deepen the connection of rules and mechanisms in the Greater Bay Area, and emphasized that he would continue to improve cross-border judicial assistance and arbitration services and consolidate Hong Kong's dispute resolution advantages.