
Bakırköy Chief Public Prosecutor's Office launched an investigation within the scope of Article 286 of the Turkish Penal Code into the images recorded without authorization in the courtroom of the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality case and shared on social media.
AI-generated summary
The IBB case is being heard in the courtroom at the Marmara Penitentiary Institutions Campus.
An investigation was officially opened upon the images reportedly taken from the courtroom during the hearings of the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality case yesterday and the day before, with 436 defendants, 53 of whom are detained, including Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality President Ekrem İmamoğlu.
In its statement, Bakırköy Chief Public Prosecutor's Office said:
"It has been determined that the images, which were apparently taken during the 15-16/10/2026 hearings held in the courtroom of the Marmara Penitentiary Institutions Campus, file number 2026/208 of the Istanbul 33rd High Criminal Court, were shared through social media accounts.
Bakırköy Chief Public Prosecutor's Office launched an ex officio investigation within the scope of Article 286 of the Turkish Penal Code against those who recorded audio or video without authorization during prosecution proceedings and shared them on their social media accounts.
It is respectfully announced to the public."
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Suspects of unauthorized recording and sharing will be identified by the prosecutor's office and legal action will be taken.
Likely · Within weeks

The IMM trial, with 436 defendants, 53 of whom are detained, including the elected IMM President Ekrem İmamoğlu, continues on its 101st day in Silivri Marmara Closed Prison. İmamoğlu continues his defense.
The Ministry of Family and Social Services announced that it will file a criminal complaint regarding the beauty contest to be held in Antalya with the participation of children aged 4-13.

The 12th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals made a precedent decision by ruling that court decisions regarding jewelry receivables can be subject to enforcement proceedings before the divorce decision is finalized.

The Ministry of Family and Social Services filed a criminal complaint against the relevant organization for making children compete based on their physical appearance and placing them in aesthetic molds.
The 12th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals ruled that the divorce decision does not need to be finalized in order for the jewelry receivable decision to be enforced. With the precedent decision, enforcement proceedings can be carried out before the divorce is finalized.

With the changes in the regulations regarding the transportation of dangerous goods, drivers are required to have an SRC5 certificate and a safety data sheet, and fines will be imposed for violations.