In the dispute over Schufa's obligation to provide information regarding its score values, the Federal Court of Justice overturned four judgments of the Dresden Higher Regional Court and remanded the proceedings.
AI-generated summary
Four private individuals had filed a lawsuit against Schufa because they considered the scoring process to be non-transparent and the information to be insufficient.
The dispute over Schufa's obligation to provide information on its scores is entering another round. The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) overturned four judgments of the Dresden Higher Regional Court (OLG) insofar as decisions had been made to the detriment of Schufa and remanded the proceedings for a new hearing and decision. The Higher Regional Court should now examine whether the plaintiffs were significantly impaired by the Schufa score.
Four private individuals had filed a lawsuit against Schufa because they considered the scoring process to be non-transparent and the information provided to them was inadequate. As part of the so-called data copy, Schufa gave them information about their stored data and score values transmitted over the last twelve months.
That wasn't enough for the Dresden Higher Regional Court: a year ago, it ordered Schufa to disclose further information to the plaintiffs, such as the weighting of the score criteria.
However, the findings of the Higher Regional Court do not support this condemnation of Schufa, decided the First Civil Senate of the Federal Court of Justice. The court should therefore have examined whether the score is decisive for whether a third party to whom the score is transmitted enters into or terminates a contractual relationship with the respective plaintiff. “In principle, the plaintiffs have to explain and prove this, although they are given considerable relief in the presentation and proof,” said the BGH Senate.
Contrary to what some other higher regional courts have assumed, according to the BGH, it is sufficient for the plaintiff to state that Schufa has transmitted a score to a company and that a decision that is disadvantageous to him is made in connection with this - for example, if he is denied a loan. Then there is the assumption that the score was decisive for this decision, explained the Karlsruhe Senate.
What is important is that the procedures refer to Schufa's old scoring procedure. Since March 17, 2026, the credit agency has been using a new score that consumers should be able to understand more easily.
Schufa wants to completely abolish the old score by the end of 2028. And the legal rules of the game are also about to change: On November 20th, an amendment to the Federal Data Protection Act will come into force, which is intended to make creditworthiness scoring more transparent and understandable overall.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Entry into force of the amendment to the Federal Data Protection Act
Very likely · Within months
Complete abolition of the old score by Schufa
Very likely · Within months

An error in the new tobacco tax law means that the law will formally come into force immediately instead of in 2027. Theoretically, this would lead to massive price increases. The Ministry of Finance classifies this as a technical error and is suspending the increase for the time being.

The BGH has overturned judgments against Schufa and referred the proceedings back to the Dresden Higher Regional Court. It must be clarified whether plaintiffs were significantly impaired by non-transparent score values.

The European Parliament has approved new rules for air passenger rights. Third-party providers will have to reimburse in the event of flight cancellations in the future. In addition, a uniform EU form for compensation applications will be introduced and accessibility in air travel will be improved.

A Frankfurt homeowner successfully asserted in the district court that Google is not allowed to publish satellite images of his property, which is not visible from the street, on Maps and Earth.

The corruption trial against the industrialist Siegfried Wolf and former finance minister Hans-Jörg Schelling has begun in Wiener Neustadt. According to the WKStA, Wolf is said to have fraudulently obtained a tax exemption by offering career help to a civil servant.

The Bonn regional court has discontinued the cum-ex criminal proceedings against a former Warburg risk controller for 40,000 euros. The trials against two co-defendants for serious tax evasion will continue in November.