
Governors from both parties are pushing back against AI-powered license plate readers amid growing privacy concerns.
Lawmakers from both sides of the political aisle are increasingly pushing to ban or restrict Flock surveillance cameras, citing government overreach and privacy violations.
AI-generated summary
Flock cameras capture billions of license plates and vehicle data monthly, aiding law enforcement but raising privacy issues.
There are plenty of issues Republicans and Democrats disagree on, but increasingly, they're aligned on this: they want Flock surveillance cameras gone.
The widespread backlash against AI-powered license plate readers, which allow police to track people over time, is becoming more of a political issue as the midterm elections approach in races from Florida to Ohio and Wisconsin.
At a press conference late last month, Pennsylvania Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro said he believes law enforcement needs public safety tools, but Flock cameras are not among them.
"I would welcome bipartisan legislation to ban these across the state," Shapiro said. "This is not something in the public interest."
Earlier this week, Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis announced plans to revoke permits for license plate readers on state highways.
"I'm all about having law enforcement have tools," DeSantis said. "But I don't want to have this become a surveillance state."
Every month, Flock cameras capture billions of license plates, along with other vehicle data. Police say this tool helps them find stolen vehicles and missing people. But the technology has been abused. Officers have used it to stalk ex-partners, for instance.
Flock recently changed some of its features to prevent abuse.
But the concerns are proving sticky, and largely bipartisan. Last week, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott froze state spending for the cameras. And Senate Republicans are investigating concerns over police misuse.
Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst at the ACLU, says a wide swath of people across the political spectrum opposes Flock cameras. Americans have a strong distaste for government surveillance, Stanley said.
"Now you have to live your life with what sociologists call the third eye that is watching you," he said, "and I think a lot of Americans don't want to live that way."
The reasons people on the left and right oppose Flock are different.
Progressives have pointed out that the technology has been used to track immigrants and people seeking abortions.
Conservatives have warned that the cameras could be used to create a national gun registry.
Others, such as conservative commentator Glenn Beck, say it's a form of government overreach.
"You cannot allow this to happen. We are creating a panopticon," he said, referring to a circular prison design that allows a single guard to see all the inmates at once.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Senate Republicans will continue investigating police misuse of surveillance cameras.
Likely · Within weeks

Following a tight primary, Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed is working to unite party factions, reassure skeptical Jewish voters over past remarks, and build a broad coalition against Republican opponent Mike Rogers.

Both parties are spending over $45 million on campaign ads attacking AI data centers for driving up utility bills and receiving tax breaks, uniting MAGA Republicans and liberal Democrats.

Philippines Vice President Sara Duterte posted bail Saturday after a court issued an arrest warrant for charges that she publicly threatened to arrange the assassination of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and two others.

A Labor Department Office of Inspector General report found that former Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer violated workplace harassment policies by fostering a hostile work environment, engaging in an inappropriate relationship with a security detail member, directing subordinates to perform personal tasks, and misusing official travel for personal reasons, though no federal laws were found to have been broken.

The Trump administration plans to begin excavation work for a 250-foot triumphal arch near Washington D.C.'s National Mall despite lacking final approvals and amid an ongoing lawsuit, citing archaeological surveys as justification while critics warn of legal overreach and damage to historic views and sites.

Immigration attorneys report that the Trump administration is scheduling immigrants' court hearings at undisclosed locations with little or no notice, potentially violating due process rules and increasing the risk of in-absentia deportation orders, particularly for those without legal representation.