
100 BTC, mined in September 2010 and worth approximately $6.9 million, were transferred to native SegWit addresses on Friday.
AI-generated summary
Block rewards in 2010 yielded 50 bitcoins, compared to 3,125 today. The P2PK format of Bitcoin's early months exposes the public key on the blockchain, making these funds theoretically vulnerable to a powerful quantum computer. BIP-361, published in April by Jameson Lopp and five co-authors, proposes freezing funds not migrated to quantum-resistant addresses after a window of approximately five years.
Waking up at dawn after sixteen years of nap. Two Bitcoin addresses powered by mining in September 2010 moved 100 BTC this Friday, November 13. The loot is worth approximately $6.9 million. These two block rewards were worth just $6 between them when they were created.
Coins have moved away from an early address format that leaves the public key visible on the blockchain. Developers have been following this type of move closely since the quantum threat entered the debate. Two months ago, 600 BTC mined the same year had already resurfaced.
The key points of this article:
Two 50 BTC mining rewards, dated September 2010, moved two minutes apart on Friday
The funds went to four new addresses in native SegWit format
Some of the pieces reached the same address less than an hour later
Owner and intent remain unknown
Two Bitcoin block rewards from 2010 come out of coma
It all happened in just over two minutes. At 4:08 UTC (5:08 a.m. Paris), the first address sent nearly 50 BTC to a new address and 0.01 BTC to another. The second followed with almost 49 BTC on one side and 1 BTC on the other.
According to data from the Mempool explorer relayed by The Block, the two batches come from block rewards mined in September 2010. Whale Alert, which first spotted the transfers, estimates that each reward was then worth around $3.
Each block validated in 2010 brought 50 new bitcoins to its miner, compared to 3,125 today. A simple desktop computer did the trick.
The nest egg now weighs more than 1.1 million times its starting value, with bitcoin around $69,100 this Friday afternoon.
Forty minutes later, 20 BTC from the first shipment and 39 BTC from the second had reached the same address starting with “bc1qj5”. The rest is distributed between three other new addresses, with 30 BTC, 10 BTC and 1 BTC.
Merging two entries in the same transaction requires holding the keys. A single entity therefore controls at least part of the funds today. His identity remains unknown, as does the possible link between the two minors from 2010.
These bitcoins leave the format most exposed to quantum
Mempool classifies the two original releases as P2PK (pay-to-public-key), the format from the early months of Bitcoin. He writes the owner's public key in plain text in the blockchain, and has done so for sixteen years for these two lots.
The four destination addresses all start with bc1q. This is native SegWit (P2WPKH), where only a cryptographic fingerprint of the key appears as long as the funds do not move.
The nuance weighs heavily. A powerful enough quantum computer could in theory find a private key from a visible public key. P2PK exits are therefore the first targets. Canadian manager 3iQ cites estimates of more than 1.7 million BTC still housed in this format. A good part would belong to Satoshi Nakamoto.
In April, Jameson Lopp and five co-authors published BIP-361. This project would ultimately freeze funds not migrated to quantum-resistant addresses, after a window of approximately five years. The text remains a draft and still divides the community.
Still keep a cool head on the motive. SegWit is not a post-quantum armor, since the public key reappears as soon as the owner spends his funds. The BIP-360's P2MR format, designed to close this door, is still awaiting activation.
Bitcoin of 2010: sale or simple move
This 2010 minor may have simply modernized his guard. Or prepared a sale. A transfer to a new address does not weigh on the market. Selling pressure only occurs with a deposit on a platform or with an over-the-counter broker.
The scenario has already been seen. In July 2025, five rewards from April 2010 had also joined SegWit addresses after fifteen years of inactivity. They were then worth nearly $30 million.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The owner of the funds could deposit the bitcoins on an exchange or with an over-the-counter broker to sell them.
Possible · Within days

Bitcoin broke $70,000 on the night of November 13, dragging down all large caps. Ether fell back below $2,000 for the first time since August, XRP touched the dollar and Dogecoin hit a three-year low. The Osmosis blockchain has stopped producing blocks and Upbit has frozen OSMO transfers.

India's Enforcement Directorate raided three premises linked to CoinDCX and Delta Exchange India in Bengaluru on November 4 and 5, suspecting overseas crypto transactions in violation of foreign exchange regulations, including through USDT, Binance, KuCoin, Gate.io, Bybit and Hyperliquid.

OKX and Intercontinental Exchange plan to launch OKXICE on November 23 for tokenized securities. More than 70 assets are announced, but 67 companies oppose the tokenization of their securities by third parties.

Bitcoin is trading around $73,500 and has lost 8.5% over seven days. The supply of stablecoins has fallen by $14.2 billion in thirty days, a level not seen since 2022. American spot Bitcoin ETFs record a fourth consecutive session of outflows, while short-term holders sell at a loss and options place the probability of a price below $70,000 at Christmas at 31%.

Binance will close French accounts on December 31, 2026 and will apply a management fee of 0.025% of the balance (minimum 10 USDC) from November 29. The article details the 5-step withdrawal procedure and presents OKX as a regulated MiCA alternative, with an 8% bonus on USDT to USDC conversion expiring on November 13.

Ethereum is trading at $2,137 on Monday, November 9 at 6 a.m., after breaking $2,100 overnight. $448 million in Ether positions were liquidated in 24 hours, compared to $272 million on Bitcoin. XRP lost 11.7% in seven days, HYPE 15.6%, Stellar 12.4% over the week and 25.4% in one month despite its arrival in MetaMask. Zcash and Monero are almost stable.