BTK's powers were transferred to the Cyber Security Directorate, access barriers are subject to discussion
Quick Look
- With the law passed by the Turkish Grand National Assembly in July, BTK's powers were transferred to the Cyber Security Directorate.
- Minister of Transport and Infrastructure Abdulkadir Uraloğlu, in response to questions about access barriers, stated that BTK's duties were transferred to the Cyber Security Directorate with the law dated July 31.
- NEW Party Spokesperson Zeynel Emre announced that they took the law to the Constitutional Court and announced that they would go before the Constitutional Court to request a stay of execution.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
With the law passed by the Turkish Grand National Assembly in July, BTK's powers were transferred to the Cyber Security Directorate. Previously, BTK was affiliated with the Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure, and the addressee of questions regarding access barriers was Minister Abdulkadir Uraloğlu.
With the law passed by the Turkish Grand National Assembly in July, the powers of the Information Technologies and Communication Authority (BTK) were transferred to the Cyber Security Directorate. Recently, when access restrictions to news sites such as T24 and some journalists' social media accounts increased, the law in question became a subject of discussion again.
Minister Abdulkadir Uraloğlu, who was previously the addressee of questions about access barriers because BTK was affiliated with the Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure, pointed to the Cyber Security Presidency, which is affiliated with the Presidency, against the MPs who submitted a parliamentary question to him regarding the barriers.
HE THROWED THE BALL TO THE PRESIDENCY
Uraloğlu even cited the same law as a reference for access blocking decisions made before the law was enacted. In this context, Uraloğlu, in addition to the deputies asking about the news sites and social media accounts that were blocked before the law was passed, asked: "How many notifications have been made regarding the implementation of access blocking decisions on social media platforms in the last two years? What are the concrete acts or contents that constitute the justification of 'protection of national security and public order' in the access blocking decisions made about the accounts belonging to Ekrem İmamoğlu?" To the deputies who asked such questions, he replied, "The duties assigned to BTK were transferred to the Presidency of the Republic of Turkey, Cyber Security Directorate, with the law no. 7590 published in the Official Gazette dated July 31."
THE NEW PARTY IS GOING TO THE COURT OF THE COURT
On the other hand, NEW Party Spokesperson Zeynel Emre reminded in his statement in the Parliament that they brought the law regarding the Cyber Security Directorate to the Constitutional Court (AYM).
Emre, who called on the Constitutional Court to discuss the application in question, said: "As the NEW Party, we will go to the Constitutional Court next week at 12.00 on Wednesday and demand that the application made by our party to the Constitutional Court be discussed as soon as possible. We will demand the operation of the stay of execution mechanism, even though it has not been implemented much lately. We invite the non-governmental organizations whose accounts have been blocked from access, other political parties, and academics whose accounts have been closed. To this statement before the Constitutional Court. "We will demand that he decide on the file as soon as possible and that the problem here will be solved completely," he said.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Constitutional Court will examine the application of the YENİ Party and decide on the request for a stay of execution.
Possible · Within weeks
Open Questions
- What are the criteria that the Cyber Security Presidency will use regarding access barriers?
- It is currently unknown whether the Yeni Party's application to the Constitutional Court will be accepted.
- What will be the transparency mechanisms in the implementation of access barriers?




