
Federal Construction Minister Verena Hubertz is planning a federally owned housing construction company with a 51 percent federal share. Economists raise constitutional concerns.
AI-generated summary
The lack of affordable housing was a central issue in the election campaign for the Berlin House of Representatives. The Left Party is calling for the socialization of large private housing companies.
It was one of the central issues in the election campaign for the Berlin House of Representatives, but goes far beyond the capital: the lack of affordable housing. The Left Party - winner of the vote - wants to combine large private housing companies - a measure that the Federal Construction Minister rejects.
Verena Hubertz is instead relying on a federally owned housing association - and has now fleshed out her plans for this. In an interview with the t-online portal, the SPD politician announced that the project planned by her and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil should be launched in 2027.
Federal government 51 percent, external 49 percent
“We will present our concept in the fall and then get started with it as quickly as possible.” It is important to her that it is a lean structure, not an authority. “We have enough of that,” said Hubertz. "We don't want to start a new construction company, but we want to work with our partners on the market in order to fully utilize the factories to capacity with our orders."
The plan is for the federal government to hold 51 percent of the shares, with 49 percent held by external parties. “The federal government’s partners can be from the private sector or municipal and state-owned housing associations,” said Hubertz.
"We as a federal government can award orders on a large scale and thereby achieve a price advantage. We also have the AAA rating, which we use for top financing conditions." A AAA rating is the highest credit rating that a rating agency can give.
Economists view plans with skepticism
Criticism of Hubertz and Klingbeil's plans comes from economists: The project poses "major constitutional risks" because, according to the Basic Law, responsibility for housing construction lies with the states, not the federal government, warned the Institute for Macroeconomics and Economic Research of the Hans Böckler Foundation (IMK) in a study. Instead, the federal government could set up a new funding pillar, for example through the KfW for low-cost housing.
The study authors, IMK director Sebastian Dullien and the former Berlin finance senator Matthias Kollatz, consider the plans to be questionable. Instead, they suggest that housing companies could receive government loan guarantees or a direct loan from the state beyond social housing, which is already heavily supported. In return, they would have to commit to offering affordable rents.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Presentation of the concept in autumn
Likely · Within months
AfD co-chairwoman Alice Weidel believes Ukraine's defensive battle is lost and calls for negotiations with Russia in an interview with the Economist. She also calls for the deportation of millions of people and criticizes Marine Le Pen.

Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil speaks about Germany's debt burden, economic growth and reforms at the IMF meeting in Bangkok. Despite highly corrected growth, the IMF is calling for savings, while coalition disputes over pensions and taxes continue in Berlin.
The outgoing SPD State Secretary Jochen Flasbarth will take over the management of the European Climate Foundation in February. The change is causing criticism because of financial connections between the Ministry of the Environment and the foundation and the lack of waiting periods.

After Bärbel Bas's resignation due to a bereavement, the SPD accused the Union of lacking consideration, which the Union denies. In addition, journalist Miriam Meckel and Handelsblatt boss Sebastian Matthes discuss the government crisis, false reports and an interview.

In a meeting, the Bundestag decided to introduce the early start pension, a gradual increase in tobacco tax and a reform of emergency care. The focus was also on investigations against MPs and EU issues.
The example of Dortmund shows that red-red-green alliances are susceptible to internal conflicts and double standards. While the Greens and the Left voted together with the AfD, the SPD partly broke away from the Left Front and supported CDU projects.