Burnham calls on Polanski to reverse Green Party's Zionism motion
Quick Look
- Andy Burnham has called on Green Party leader Zack Polanski to reverse a party motion declaring Zionism a form of racism, which was passed at the party's conference in Brighton.
- The motion defined Zionism as supporting an ethnonationalist Jewish state and backed a single democratic Palestinian state across historic Palestine.
- Polanski, who did not vote on the motion and left the conference early for the Holborn and St Pancras by-election campaign, has declined media interviews.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The Green Party operates under an internal democracy model where party policy is decided by members, though these positions are not necessarily included in general election manifestos. The motion declaring Zionism a form of racism was passed at the party's conference in Brighton and defined Zionism as supporting an ethnonationalist Jewish state while backing a single democratic Palestinian state across historic Palestine.
Andy Burnham has called on Green leader Zack Polanski to reverse a motion passed by members of his party declaring Zionism a form of racism.
The prime minister said the motion, approved on Sunday at the party's conference in Brighton, was "completely wrong" and showed "terrible judgement".
The motion defined Zionism as an ideology supporting "an ethnonationalist Jewish state" and backed a "single democratic Palestinian state in all of historic Palestine", which includes modern-day Israel.
In the wake of the vote, Polanski has said he would not accept anyone being excluded from the Green Party "because of the religious or communal body they are part of".
The Green leader has declined media interviews since the motion was passed and did not answer questions from a BBC reporter about the motion ahead of Burnham's comments.
The former Green leader Caroline Lucas has criticised Polanski for not taking part in a debate and vote on the controversial motion.
Lucas told the BBC the jury was out on whether he would now show the leadership she believed was required.
She told Newsnight: "He should have been there and he should have voted."
Lucas, who voted against the motion, added: "I would have hoped he would have been a very strong critic of this motion. The motion was flawed from top to bottom - in my view it is dangerous, it is divisive."
Asked if Polanski should stand down, she said: "I think let's just see what happens in the coming days and weeks. Obviously he has been completely taken up with this by-election.
"I want him to speak now about what's happened, I want him to show the leadership that was frankly missing on Sunday. I think the jury is out about whether he will do that - but I very much hope he will."
The controversy comes as polls close in Thursday's Holborn and St Pancras by-election, in which Polanski is a candidate.
The motion has complicated the final days of Polanksi's campaign in the contest, where the Greens have been looking to overturn a substantial Labour majority in the seat vacated by former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.
It has sparked days of controversy, with four of the five Green MPs opposing it, its co-deputy leaders split on supporting it, the Green deputy leader in Wales resigning, and condemnation from members and Green counterparts in Europe.
Polanski did not vote on the Zionism motion, having left the conference early to return to London for the by-election campaign.
An amendment he had backed to specify that the motion should not be used to discipline Jewish members attending synagogues that consider themselves Zionist was voted down by members.
Before the vote, he had also said he wanted to see the reference to a single Palestinian state changed, arguing: "I don't believe we as a Green Party of England and Wales, or even the British government, should be deciding what the future settlement looks like."
The Green Party has an internal democracy model, under which official party policy is decided by members. However, these positions are not necessarily included in the party's general election manifestos.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Zack Polanski will face increasing pressure to reverse the Zionism motion or clarify his position
Likely · Within days
The Green Party will experience further internal divisions or resignations over the Zionism motion
Possible · Within weeks
Open Questions
- Will Zack Polanski reverse the motion as urged by Andy Burnham?
- How will the controversy affect the Green Party's performance in the Holborn and St Pancras by-election?
- Will Zack Polanski speak publicly about the motion and show leadership as called for by Caroline Lucas?
- What are the long-term implications for the Green Party's internal democracy model following this controversy?







