The National Civil Service Bureau clearly recruits 35,700 people, strictly adheres to the bottom line of fairness, and prevents fraud
AI-generated summary
"Public examination recruitment" means that many people apply for the same position together, artificially creating false popularity to make other candidates give up applying, thereby ensuring that specific people are admitted.
China News Service, Beijing, October 13 (Reporter Li Jingtong) On the 13th, the National Civil Service Bureau announced that registration for civil servants to be recruited for the 2027 examinations of central agencies and their directly affiliated agencies will soon begin, and a total of 35,700 people are planned to be recruited.
Compared with last year, there is a new change in the registration process for the national examination this year: the addition of real-name and real-person certification.
According to the recruitment requirements of this time, applicants need to log in to the special website and complete the registration within the specified time, and then conduct real-name authentication through electronic social security cards, etc. before they can register and submit the application.
Why add this link? The finger points at the "public examination encirclement".
When the National Civil Service Bureau introduced the four characteristics of this recruitment, it specifically mentioned "strictly adhering to the bottom line of fairness" and clearly emphasized the need to "crack down on and prevent the fraud of 'public examination girding'".
What is "public examination encirclement"?
Zhuang Deshui, deputy director of the Public Policy Research Center of Peking University, told a reporter from China News Service that the so-called "public examination recruitment" refers to the concentrated application for the same position by many people, but the purpose is to ensure that a specific person can be admitted, and others are just "accompanying the examination" to artificially create false registration enthusiasm and discourage other applicants.
"This kind of behavior seems to take advantage of the rules, but in fact it seriously undermines the recruitment principles of 'openness, equality, competition, and merit-based selection.'" Yi Dinghong, an expert from the Huatu Education Research Institute, said that the "public examination roundup" fraud not only blocks truly capable candidates from opportunities, but also damages the social credibility of the civil service examination.
Fair examination is the bottom line and the lifeline. This national examination has revealed the disposal method: improve the joint punishment mechanism for examination integrity, invalidate the test results of the subject, invalidate the results of all examination subjects, or restrict the application for candidates who violate regulations and disciplines, and seriously hold accountable public officials who have dereliction of duty, dereliction of duty, and corruption and punish them in accordance with regulations, disciplines, and laws.
The application guide issued by the National Civil Service Bureau also mentions that if someone maliciously registers registration information, disrupts the order of registration, or forges or alters relevant materials to defraud the application qualifications, the central civil service department will cancel the application qualifications and restrict the application for civil servants within five years.
Experts analyze that this year's national examination will elevate the bottom line of fairness to a more prominent position, emphasizing both crackdowns and prevention. This is not only a deterrent to individual cases of fraud, but also a reaffirmation of the red line of the application rules. At the same time, the improvement of the joint punishment mechanism for examination integrity will also help ensure the fairness and impartiality of the examination, allowing honest applicants to take the examination with peace of mind.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Candidates must complete real-name authentication through electronic social security cards before registering.
Very likely · Within days

Shen Boyang, the Taipei mayoral candidate of the Democratic Progressive Party, was invited to give a speech at Taipei University and proposed the idea of establishing a "Taipei Research Institute" think tank, advocating institutionalized municipal planning and discussing issues such as urban governance, youth funds, and industrial development with young people.

In response to KMT legislator Li Yanxiu's speech on the drug harm reduction mechanism, Shen Yaoyi, vice chairman of the Taipei City Social Workers Professional Union, criticized it for distorting the social work profession and public health policies and demanded a public apology. Li Yanxiu responded that he recognized the social work profession and reiterated his opposition to providing drugs in the community.

Taichung City's 2016 general budget was approved by the city council on the third reading. Annual revenue and annual expenditures were deleted by NT$620 million, with projects adjusted by the city government. Another NT$395 million in annual expenditure budgets were frozen.

Taoyuan Jinming Industrial was suspected of using parts made in China to assemble drones and delivered them to the national military units. The deputy director and business director were indicted. Kuomintang legislator Wang Hongwei questioned President Lai Qingde's support for him, and was immediately criticized by designer Nie Yongzhen and netizens for commenting on his own words and deeds.

Leaders Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das of India's Cockroach Janta Party were detained in New Delhi after breaching barricades at Jantar Mantar, amid ongoing protests against controversial voter-roll overhauls.

Legislative Yuan Hanguo-yu's National Day speech mentioned that the political Yuan's failure to countersign the bill would affect democracy. Executive President Zhuo Rongtai responded that this was a passive and necessary approach. Xu Yuzhen, secretary-general of the Kuomintang League, criticized the political Yuan for treating the will as the constitution and reducing the separation of powers to empty talk.