A court in St. Petersburg rejected the bank's attempt to review the decision on the loan agreement, citing the Dolina case

A resident of St. Petersburg filed a lawsuit to declare the loan agreement for 180 thousand rubles invalid, since she did not receive the funds.

The court declared the agreement invalid and released the woman from her loan obligations, and also ordered compensation for moral damages and legal costs from the bank.

Representatives of the bank tried to get the decision reviewed, citing the Supreme Court ruling in the case of singer Larisa Dolina, but were refused.

MOSCOW, October 6 - RIA Novosti. Representatives of the Russian bank tried to obtain a review of the decision on the controversial loan, citing the ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in the case of singer Larisa Dolina, but were refused, according to court materials available to RIA Novosti.

A resident of St. Petersburg appealed to the court, on whose behalf third parties entered into a loan agreement for 180 thousand rubles, the document states. The woman insisted that she did not receive the funds, and appealed to law enforcement agencies to initiate a criminal case, and later to the court with a claim to invalidate the contract.

The court took into account that the contract was concluded from “an atypical (mobile) device for the client, and in the process the telephone number for logging into the system was changed,” declared the contract invalid and released the woman from loan obligations. Also, 10 thousand rubles in compensation for moral damage, 5 thousand rubles in a fine and 24 thousand rubles in legal expenses were recovered from the bank in her favor.

Representatives of the bank indicated in the complaint that the agreement was concluded remotely, and to enter the system they used a login and password known to the plaintiff or one-time passwords sent to his mobile phone. Thus, there was no reason to believe that the agreement was concluded by third parties, the materials say.

In addition, the bank proposed to reconsider the decision due to new circumstances, citing the Supreme Court ruling in the case of singer Larisa Dolina. Representatives of the credit institution considered the circumstances of the two situations “identical,” it follows from the materials.

Nevertheless, the court in St. Petersburg rejected the application, pointing out that the above ruling of the Supreme Court is not a new circumstance provided for by law for reviewing a judicial act. The court also noted that the two cases “are not similar factual circumstances,” according to the materials.