
民眾黨爆料僑委會主委徐佳青讓兒子冒充攝影官隨訪並濫用外館座車,違反貪汙治罪條例。卓榮泰強調尊重部會調查,將儘速向國人回報結果,並呼籲公務員自律注意觀感。僑委會稱行程依法申報,外交部將主動查明事實。
AI-generated summary
民眾黨指控僑委會主委徐佳青讓兒子冒充攝影官隨訪並濫用外館專屬座車,涉嫌違反貪汙治罪條例。卓榮泰表示將尊重部會調查並儘速回報。
僑委會委員長徐佳青昨遭民眾黨爆料讓其兒充當「攝影官」隨訪赴外,其夫更濫用外館專屬座車,明顯違反「貪汙治罪條例」,要求徐即刻停職,接受政風調查,依法究責。對此,卓揆強調會尊重部會調查,儘速向國人回報調查結果;同時呼籲公務員一定要自律、注意各方面觀感,以符法律及國人要求。
行政院長卓榮泰今(6)赴立法院繼續進行施政報告並備詢,會前接受媒體時事聯訪。
請繼續往下閱讀...
民眾黨黨團昨舉行記者會指控,徐佳青任職僑委會期間屢次讓兒子隨行出訪「蹭吃蹭車」,甚至冒充「攝影官」等工作人員身份,濫用特權。
對此,僑委會表示,公務行程及費用皆依法申報且核實執行,絕無濫用公帑圖利私人情事;外交部則稱迄今未接獲相關申訴或檢舉,但基於審慎原則,仍將主動就前揭情事請相關駐外館處查明,釐清事實。
被問及徐佳青是否還適任僑委會委員長,以及外館調查期限,卓榮泰表示,這件事實,徐委員長總然有自身說明,但已經由外交部跟僑委會進行了解,我們也期待能儘快回報調查結果、公諸於世,讓整個事情可以水落石出。
他強調,公務員一定要提高自律,在各個方面都要特別注意到觀感,以及國人跟法律的要求。那我也希望報導的內容,我們要正確的事實,所以一定要一切等待外交部跟僑委會的報告之後,我們在向國人再做報告,謝謝。
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
外交部與僑委會將完成初步調查並向行政院報告
Likely · Within weeks
若查證屬實,徐佳青可能面臨政風調查或紀律處分
Possible · Within weeks

Shen Boyang, a Taipei mayoral candidate from the Democratic Progressive Party, distributed the first issue of the Shun Bao in full color printing at the Taipei MRT Zhongxiao Fuxing Station on the morning of the 6th, attracting many supporters of "Ocean Current" to pick it up. Legislator Wu Siyao praised his competent newspaper distribution work, and 1,000 copies were distributed within half an hour. Netizens left messages praising the creativity and quality of the election event.

During the General Policy Question of the Legislative Yuan, Xu Jiaqing, chairman of the Overseas Chinese Affairs Council, responded to the controversy surrounding his son's alleged abuse of privileges and the couple's private use of official cars. He pointed out that the official budget of the Overseas Chinese Affairs Council has been inspected twice in the past two or three months, and everything was handled in accordance with the law. There was no profit-making.

Kaohsiung City Councilor Li Meizhen questioned Executive Director Zhuo Rongtai's obstruction of the progress of the Kaohsiung Purple Line. Mayor Chen Chimai responded that the main reason was the reduction of central subsidies due to the revision of the fiscal revenue and expenditure division law. Kaohsiung will be short of 10.3 billion yuan this year and is expected to be 3.3 billion yuan less next year. The planned subsidy has been short of 13.6 billion yuan in the MRT part, and the track construction progress will be moved back.

New Taipei City Mayor Hou Youyi reiterated his zero-tolerance stance on drugs at the "New Taipei City Happy Education Exhibition" event, believing that drug crimes should be severely punished, and pointed out that his attitude has not changed since he became a police officer. This remark occurred during the Taipei mayoral election. KMT candidate Chiang Wanan and DPP candidate Shen Boyang clashed over drug policy issues. The public is concerned about whether drug issues will deepen cross-strait confrontation.

The People's Party caucus cited people with knowledge of the situation abroad who accused Xu Jiaqing, chairman of the Overseas Chinese Affairs Council, of letting his son pretend to be a photographer to accompany him on trips to France, Germany and other countries, while his husband Tang Bowei used a private official car to visit Washington. Wu Zhizhong, Parliamentary Undersecretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said that he had asked the representative offices abroad to clarify the matter and emphasized that Xu Jiaqing has the responsibility to take care of her mother. People's Party legislator Chen Qinglong denounced this as an abuse of privileges and questioned the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' preemptive guidance to put out the fire. In fact, it was officials protecting each other.

Lin Jianzheng, a retired scholar at Yangming National Chiao Tung University, pointed out that the establishment of Taipei mayoral candidate Shen Boyang's campaign headquarters in 2026 attracted 120,000 participants, forming a "Korean Wave" campaign wave similar to that launched by Han Kuo-yu in Kaohsiung in 2018. He said that this "ocean current" will affect the outcome of the election campaign, and analyzed the similarities and differences between the two in terms of political background and voter mobilization.