
The lawyers' appeal was accepted. Doctors: "Guarantors of the care of every individual"
The Court of Cassation annulled with postponement the provision on precautionary disqualification measures for three female doctors investigated in Ravenna for false ideology and interruption of public service regarding certificates to avoid the CPR.
AI-generated summary
The three doctors were banned from practicing and suspended for ten months as part of an investigation into medical certificates to avoid the detention center for repatriation.
The Court of Cassation annulled, with a referral to a new judgment of the Bologna Review Court, the provision on the precautionary disqualification measures for the three female doctors investigated by the Ravenna Prosecutor's Office in the investigation into the certificates to avoid the detention center for repatriation.
The hearing took place on Friday, following the appeals of the defenders, lawyers Salvatore Tesoriero and Francesca Cancellaro.
The three suspects had been banned from the profession, with suspension for ten months. The investigation is for continued false ideology and interruption of public service.
The defense: "Doctors guarantee the care of every individual"
"The annulment ordered by the Supreme Court restores to female doctors the personal and professional dignity so harshly attacked by the Ravenna investigation. We had underlined in the appeal to the Supreme Court how the actions of our clients corresponded to the fulfillment of the duties of care and protection of the health of every person established by the Constitution and by supranational sources, as well as by the ethics that govern the medical profession". This was stated by the lawyers Salvatore Tesoriero and Francesca Cancellaro, defenders of the three doctors investigated in Ravenna in the investigation into the CPR certificates, after the annulment of the measures decided by the Supreme Court.
"The disproportion of the precautionary measures applied gives rise to the need for a re-reading of the matter based on the values that underpin our constitutional system: as we have always maintained, doctors must remain first of all guarantors of the health and care of each individual, not as participants of a specific community, but as human beings", continue the defenders.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
New judgment by the Bologna Review Court
Very likely · Within weeks

The Court of Appeal of Milan has annulled the first degree conviction which required MEP Ilaria Salis to pay over 300 thousand euros to her former assistants Valentina Dadda and François Gelmetti. The case returns to court.

MP Letizia Giorgianni has presented a bill to introduce a suspension of executive actions for up to 180 days for those seeking to repay their debts, aiming for greater flexibility in repayment plans and bureaucratic simplifications.

The Milan Prosecutor's Office has appealed to the Supreme Court against the acquittal of Mattia Lucarelli, Federico Apolloni and three other defendants, accused of gang sexual assault on a US student in 2022.

In the appeal process on the Askatasuna case, the activist Dana Lauriola rejected the accusation of criminal association, defining the social center as a media "bogeyman" to belittle the No Tav movement.

MEP Ilaria Salis arrived at the Court of Milan for the appeal hearing on the dispute with two former collaborators, who had obtained compensation of 300 thousand euros in the first instance.

The Turin Juvenile Prosecutor's Office asked the Court of Appeal to overturn the acquittal of two boys aged 14 and 15 accused of having subjected a peer with intellectual and mental disabilities to over twelve hours of violence, including sexual abuse, forced shaving, burning with a cigarette and being forced to enter the Dora river, during the night between 31 October and 1 November 2025. The complaint came from the victim and her mother, who he had also recounted the incident on social media. Prosecutors argue that the necessary consensus to qualify the acts as 'jokes' was lacking, highlighting the asymmetry of understanding between the participants.