
The appeal ruling which acquitted the two footballers and three friends of the charge of gang sexual violence was challenged.
The Milan Prosecutor's Office has appealed to the Supreme Court against the acquittal of Mattia Lucarelli, Federico Apolloni and three other defendants, accused of gang sexual assault on a US student in 2022.
AI-generated summary
The facts date back to the night between 26 and 27 March 2022. The defendants were convicted at first instance before being acquitted on appeal on 23 April.
The General Prosecutor's Office of Milan has challenged, with an appeal to the Supreme Court, the sentence with which the Court of Appeal, last April 23, fully acquitted "because the fact does not exist" the two young footballers Mattia Lucarelli, 26 years old and son of the former Livorno striker Cristiano, and Federico Apolloni, the same age, and three of their friends of the accusation of having abused a 22-year-old American student four years ago.
The second instance, in fact, accepting the line of the defenders, including the lawyers Leonardo Cammarata and Francesca Nobili, had swept away the sentences of 3 years and 7 months of imprisonment for Lucarelli junior and Apolloni, 2 years and 8 months for one accused and 2 years and 5 months for the other two, which had also arrived after the arrests, with house arrest measures, in January 2023. While the investigations, conducted by the Police and coordinated by the prosecutor Alessia Menegazzo, had also gone through an evidentiary incident to crystallize the girl's version after her report on the alleged gang rape dating back to the night between 26 and 27 March 2022.
For the Milanese Court of Appeal, however, as written in the reasons, it remained a "fragile and inadequately corroborated hypothesis" that Lucarelli junior and the others had exerted "subtle pressure" and taken advantage of the student's "impaired capacity for resistance", altered by alcohol but not to the point of "being dazed". For the judges, since there was no proof of "a concrete inductive activity capable of vitiating the consent" of the young woman, "one of the essential elements of the accusatory reconstruction" was missing.
In the abbreviated reasons for the first instance, filed in September 2024, the preliminary hearing judge Roberto Crepaldi, however, had spoken of a "collective action, aimed at obtaining the consent" of the girl "to sexual acts with the greatest number of them, despite full awareness of the state of alteration".
The appeal of the deputy prosecutor Massimo Gaballo, who had asked for the convictions to be confirmed, is along this line. The annulment of the acquittals is now requested with postponement for a new trial on appeal.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Court of Cassation will have to rule on the admissibility and merit of the appeal.
Very likely · Within months

The Court of Appeal of Milan has annulled the first degree conviction which required MEP Ilaria Salis to pay over 300 thousand euros to her former assistants Valentina Dadda and François Gelmetti. The case returns to court.

The Court of Cassation annulled with postponement the provision on precautionary disqualification measures for three female doctors investigated in Ravenna for false ideology and interruption of public service regarding certificates to avoid the CPR.

MP Letizia Giorgianni has presented a bill to introduce a suspension of executive actions for up to 180 days for those seeking to repay their debts, aiming for greater flexibility in repayment plans and bureaucratic simplifications.

In the appeal process on the Askatasuna case, the activist Dana Lauriola rejected the accusation of criminal association, defining the social center as a media "bogeyman" to belittle the No Tav movement.

MEP Ilaria Salis arrived at the Court of Milan for the appeal hearing on the dispute with two former collaborators, who had obtained compensation of 300 thousand euros in the first instance.

The Turin Juvenile Prosecutor's Office asked the Court of Appeal to overturn the acquittal of two boys aged 14 and 15 accused of having subjected a peer with intellectual and mental disabilities to over twelve hours of violence, including sexual abuse, forced shaving, burning with a cigarette and being forced to enter the Dora river, during the night between 31 October and 1 November 2025. The complaint came from the victim and her mother, who he had also recounted the incident on social media. Prosecutors argue that the necessary consensus to qualify the acts as 'jokes' was lacking, highlighting the asymmetry of understanding between the participants.