
AI-generated summary
Families have filed wrongful death lawsuits against Character.AI and OpenAI, alleging that interactions with AI chatbots contributed to suicides and delusions among underage users, including 14-year-old Sewell Setzer who developed an emotional attachment to a Character.ai bot before dying by suicide.
With all the talk about how AI might one day kill us all, it’s easy to forget that AI has already been life-threatening to some, not through bioweapons, but psychologically.
For example, Character.AI settled several wrongful death lawsuits earlier this year brought by families of underage users who died by suicide after interactions with its bots. Multiple families have also sued OpenAI over ChatGPT’s alleged role in their loved ones’ suicides and delusions.
Making AI safer across languages and cultures is the mission of Circuit Breaker Labs, one of TechCrunch’s 2026 Startup Battlefield 200 finalists. (Circuit Breaker will be pitching at TechCrunch Disrupt, which takes place at Moscone West in San Francisco from October 13-15, 2026.)
Founders Shirali and Arul Nigam, who are siblings, were motivated by Sewell Setzer, the 14-year-old who developed an emotional attachment to a Character.ai chatbot and confessed thoughts to it of harming himself before dying by suicide. The chatbot, the parents alleged in a 2024 lawsuit, encouraged him. The bot may not have understood what words like “I want to be with you” really implied, said Arul Nigam, who is Circuit Breaker Labs’ CTO.
“A lot of people, especially young people, turn to these systems for support, and usually they aren’t actually getting the help they need. But in many cases, they’re actively being harmed, and people unfortunately have taken their lives already,” Nigam said. “Those sorts of safety vulnerabilities, where people aren’t necessarily actively trying to break the system — they’re engaging in a natural way — and the system has context pollution or it doesn’t understand the nuance, and then takes really dangerous action, we’re trying to prevent that.”
Circuit Breaker Labs has created AI agents that it likens to an army of crash-test dummies. These agents mimic folks from all ages, backgrounds, languages, cultures, and are used to test models on their ability to detect dangerous, psychologically harmful interactions.
“The way a six-year-old girl versus a 45-year-old man, or someone who speaks English as a first language versus a second language, or … gamer slang versus someone else who uses a different kind of slang, all of those can really trip up a model,” said Shirali Nigam, who is Circuit Breaker Labs’ CEO. “Models are really good at handling standard speech patterns, but nobody actually talks like that and so if the model misunderstands nuance or slang, it can go really badly.”
The startup works with human domain experts to build its hyper-realistic user simulations in order to run “red-team” tests against models, which are adversarial tests meant to uncover weaknesses. The tests are built to reflect real human speech patterns, slang, coded language and typos. Circuit Breaker Labs then runs tens of thousand to hundreds of thousands of simulated interactions per day.
The idea is to ensure that a model can appropriately respond to risky interactions that may emerge over time, and many conversations. Circuit Breaker Labs then uses a proprietary scoring method that to create auditable, explainable scores.
Circuit Breaker Labs is currently operating as an AI safety testing lab for high-risk AI applications such as AI coaching, journaling, or other mental health support apps, though Arul Nigam declined to name its marquee customers. Although the startup has a working product, it is in the very early stages, with only five employees including the Nigam siblings.
Eventually, though, the testing platform could be applied to any app where someone may fall down an “AI psychosis” hole, where the human is at risk of developing a parasocial relationship with a chatbot. Examples include AI “co-worker” agents, whose reponses can vary from one interaction to the next.
“People are becoming more skeptical of AI or more resistant to adopt it across the board,” Arul Nigam said, adding that while skepticism is healthy, banning a potentially valuable tool over safety concerns would be “regressive.”
Circuit Breakers Labs believes the answer to those fears is making AI safer. “We want to help build that trust for people.”
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Circuit Breaker Labs will secure marquee customers in the AI coaching and mental health app sectors within the next 6 months.
Likely · Within months
Regulatory scrutiny of AI psychological safety will increase following continued litigation and public awareness of cases like Sewell Setzer’s.
Very likely · Within months

Apple announced new controls for macOS Full Disk Access following reports that AI agents like Meta's Muse and ChatGPT's Mac app could access private messages and sensitive data without explicit user permission, citing growing risks as AI becomes more autonomous.

OpenAI's new AI agent platform Dots, featuring customizable blob avatars, is positioned as enterprise-focused software for automating work tasks rather than personal errands, with testing showing strengths in workflow automation but weaknesses in navigating consumer websites due to security checks, requiring manual intervention for tasks like online ordering and account logins.

Creators who previously avoided Substack's 10% transaction fee are now facing a new price increase of at least $10 per month, according to The Verge Daily.

Pope Leo XIV has issued a statement on X distinguishing human art from AI-generated content, arguing that algorithms lack the 'spark of humanity' found in human creation. This follows his May encyclical on human dignity in an age of automation.

The .si domain, associated with Slovenia, is seeing a massive registration surge after a U.S. executive order mandated government agencies refer to AI as 'super intelligence.' Registrars report thousands of new sign-ups, driven by speculation and branding.

Epic has paused most product development for six weeks to remediate security flaws in its MyChart software. The vulnerabilities, identified by an AI model, could potentially allow unauthorized access to patient records without triggering system logs.