Class action launched against BHP over holiday work requirements
Quick Look
A class action has been filed against BHP by the Mining and Energy Union on behalf of two lead plaintiffs, alleging improper holiday work requirements at its subsidiary Operations Services between 2019 and 2023, following a Federal Court ruling that OS breached the Fair Work Act by requiring 85 employees to work on Christmas Day 2019 Christmas Day at the Daunia mine.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The Federal Court previously ruled that Operations Services, a BHP subsidiary, breached the Fair Work Act by requiring 85 employees to work on Christmas Day 2019 at the Daunia mine in Central Queensland.
A class action has been launched against Australia's biggest mining company, BHP, months after the Federal Court found one of its subsidiaries improperly required employees to work on public holidays.
The Federal Court ruled last year that Operations Services (OS), a subsidiary of BHP, breached the Fair Work Act by requiring 85 employees to work on Christmas Day 2019 at the Daunia mine near Moranbah, in Central Queensland.
The new class action, which will be run by Sydney-based AEN Legal on behalf of two lead plaintiffs, will be funded by the Mining and Energy Union (MEU).
MEU Queensland president Mitch Hughes said the action potentially covered about 7,000 employees, which included workers who were employed by OS between December 2019 and March 2023.
During that time, OS employed people across coal mines in Queensland and NSW, iron ore operations in WA and copper mines in SA.
"That'll probably narrow down, depending on the scope," he said.
Mr Hughes said the employees' concerns included a lack of consultation by OS management before allocating shifts.
"In some cases, we heard accounts from the workforce where everyone's name was simply put into a hat, and they were selected [to work public holidays]."
He said BHP would typically run a "skeleton crew" across Christmas and Boxing Day and described the decision to keep the mines running at full production in recent years as "ruling with an iron fist".
In a statement, BHP said the "proceedings remain before the Court and no findings have been made in relation to the claims".
It said it would not comment further because the matter was "ongoing".
Mr Hughes said the court action was designed to build on last year's Federal Court decision, which was specific to the Daunia mine workers of 2019.
In his judgement, Justice Darryl Rangiah detailed some of the circumstances in which the miners left their families to work on Christmas and Boxing Day.
In one instance, a single mother paid $500 for a babysitter for her two children when she went to work.
In another, a man missed out on time in New Zealand with his young daughter, who he had planned to visit.
Others said they were able to spend some time at Christmas celebrations, but were forced to depart early to attend work, upsetting family members.
BHP has appealed the Federal Court decision, which is set to be heard on November 9.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Federal Court will hear BHP's appeal of the original decision on November 9.
Very likely · Within months
The class action will proceed through the court system with potential settlement discussions.
Likely · Within months
Open Questions
- What is the potential financial liability for BHP if the class action succeeds?
- How many employees will ultimately be included in the class action?
- When will the court hear BHP's appeal of the original Federal Court decision?
- What specific compensation are the lead plaintiffs seeking?