Breaking
ITItalian schools not equipped for extreme heat, Sima asks for postponement of the school yearPLAfrica vs. Greenland - time to change your perspectiveKRWeekly Roundup: White House Consults DPAA on North Korea, Pyongyang Downgrades London MissionRUPolitico: CDU admits Merz's resignation after elections in Saxony-AnhaltCNSino-Indian Relations Thaw Amid US Tariffs and Strategic ShiftsVNNationwide recall of failed batches of Colchicina Seid gout treatment medicineDEFifa accuses UEFA of a smear campaign in the dispute over World Cup investorsDEWarning strikes in northern German ports: dock workers demand more wagesITHighway Code, fines down by 7%: the blow comes for those who drive without insuranceESPedro Sánchez discards evidence of Morocco's participation in the Ceuta crisisITItalian schools not equipped for extreme heat, Sima asks for postponement of the school yearPLAfrica vs. Greenland - time to change your perspectiveKRWeekly Roundup: White House Consults DPAA on North Korea, Pyongyang Downgrades London MissionRUPolitico: CDU admits Merz's resignation after elections in Saxony-AnhaltCNSino-Indian Relations Thaw Amid US Tariffs and Strategic ShiftsVNNationwide recall of failed batches of Colchicina Seid gout treatment medicineDEFifa accuses UEFA of a smear campaign in the dispute over World Cup investorsDEWarning strikes in northern German ports: dock workers demand more wagesITHighway Code, fines down by 7%: the blow comes for those who drive without insuranceESPedro Sánchez discards evidence of Morocco's participation in the Ceuta crisis
BackCoalition’s tobacco excise cut plan questioned by health experts
Coalition’s tobacco excise cut plan questioned by health experts
Developing
Guardian Australia37 minutes agoPolitics3 min readAustralia

Coalition’s tobacco excise cut plan questioned by health experts

Health experts warn that slashing the tobacco excise by 80% is misguided and will undermine Australia’s success in reducing smoking rates.

Quick Look

The Coalition's shadow health minister Anne Ruston defends a proposed 80% cut to the tobacco excise, while health experts warn the move will lower illicit prices and fail to curb smoking rates.

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

The Coalition proposed cutting the tobacco excise by 80% alongside increased law enforcement to combat the black market.

Font size

The Coalition’s health spokesperson has been unable to detail how its proposed slashing of the tobacco excise would reduce smoking rates, as experts say tougher enforcement should be the main focus for governments.

The shadow health minister, Anne Ruston, on Friday said that cutting the excise by 80% and funding an additional $200m on a law enforcement push would take back market control from organised crime.

“We are hoping that the combined package of what we’re proposing here, not just the dropping of the excise, but the regulation of the market and making it certainly more difficult for children to access these products,” Ruston told the ABC’s Radio National.

“In the enforcement surge and the anti-smoking and anti-vaping campaigns, we are hoping to put downward pressure on smoking rates.”

But health experts have warned the proposal – similar to that used in Canada in the 1990s – is misguided, and will wind back Australia’s success in bringing down smoking rates.

Instead, they have called on governments to focus on enforcement, including by tracking cigarette imports to ensure products aren’t diverted to the black market and by tough crack downs on illicit tobacco retailers that operate throughout Australia.

Prof Becky Freeman, a University of Sydney tobacco control expert, said the first port of call was enforcing existing laws to curb tobacco supply and targeting criminal supply chains.

“There’s no point in having laws if we don’t enforce them,” she said.

“Illicit tobacco markets are actually shaped by supply chains, enforcement capacity, organised crime opportunity, how the industry behaves, retail controls, border dynamics, and, of course, the political pressures.

“[Cigarettes are] really an inexpensive commodity to make. So, what would happen in response if this 80% tax cut went through? Illicit prices would get lower as well.

“If you don’t actually dismantle those illicit supply networks, you are not going to be able to beat them on price.”

Freeman said the government could also reduce the number of legal tobacco retailers. There are an estimated 40,000 retailers around Australia.

Dr Cheneal Puljevic, a health expert at the University of Queensland researching illicit markets, said reducing tobacco demand by highlighting smoking harms was another important move.

“It’s been decades since we’ve had a strong public health campaign,” she said.

“We should be using the excise to make nicotine replacement therapy free, and basically throwing everything we can at promoting smoking cessation and helping people to quit smoking.”

Puljevic said there were effective methods for monitoring the supply of tobacco coming into the country, such as international track and trace systems that allow authorities to check when and where shipments exit supply chains.

“There’s just a million things that we could be trying first before we do something as drastic as lowering taxes,” she said.

The independent economist Chris Richardson backs a temporary reduction to the excise and an increase in enforcement to prevent billions of dollars in profits flowing to organised crime. But he agreed it was time for Australia to face the music and tackle the black market head on.

“We need shock and awe for the legal product. You know, the combination of its price going down due to a tax change, and the effective cost of business of organised crime going up as a result of better enforcement,” he said.

“You don’t have to have really low taxes on tobacco forever, but you have to have them as a circuit breaker until we can get the rule of law back in this market.”

Illicit tobacco accounted for 80% of the cigarettes smoked by Australians in 2025, with untaxed packets costing as little as $10 compared with more than $40 for a legal packet.

With increased profits from illegal tobacco sales going to organised crime groups that have pounced on the market imbalance, the Coalition and One Nation have called for the federal government to drastically reduce the excise it collects.

The federal government raises nearly $30 per legal packet of cigarettes sold in Australia, accounting for about 75% of the cost.

Federal excise revenue peaked at $16.3bn in 2019-20 but was expected to generate only $5.5bn last financial year, and $4.8bn this year.

Angus Taylor unveiled the opposition’s policy on Thursday, pledging to reduce it by 80% from its current rate of around $30 a to about $6. The opposition leader said this would end the black market’s dominance and pull the market back under regulation.

The Liberals have also said they would legalise and regulate vapes and nicotine pouches, and would spend $200m on a law enforcement push against illicit sales, with increased funding for the Australian Border Force, federal police and other agencies.

Freeman said research had shown the high cost of cigarettes was one of the most effective deterrents to smoking.

“Making cigarettes cheap everywhere to everyone in every single shop all across the country will take away that price pressure.”

Open Questions

  • How will the Coalition ensure lower prices do not increase overall smoking rates?
  • What specific legislative timeline is proposed for the enforcement surge?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by Guardian Australia.

Related Stories

Boodjamulla National Park formally returned to Waanyi people after decades of land rights struggle
Developing·

Boodjamulla National Park formally returned to Waanyi people after decades of land rights struggle

More than 247,000 hectares of Boodjamulla National Park in outback Queensland has been formally returned to the Waanyi people, who have maintained a connection to the land for over 30,000 years. The handback follows decades of activism, including protests and negotiations, and establishes a co-management model with the Queensland government while ensuring continued public access.

ABC Top Stories
2 min read
March for Australia Rally Draws Less Attention as Focus Shifts to Free Speech and Neo-Nazi Ties
Developing·

March for Australia Rally Draws Less Attention as Focus Shifts to Free Speech and Neo-Nazi Ties

The March for Australia rally last weekend attracted less media attention than prior anti-immigration protests, with organizers shifting focus from opposing 'mass immigration' to advocating for free speech, including overturning the ban on the white nationalist National Socialist Network. Neo-Nazi activist Thomas Sewell was labeled a 'political prisoner' by organizers, and dozens of NSN members attended. While most outlets ignored the event, the Daily Mail published a report featuring offensive content by comedian Lisa Jane Spencer, which drew supportive comments before deletion. Separately, Kyle Sandilands faced backlash from subscribers after verbally abusing his executive producer on air, with critics calling it emotional manipulation. In media news, Channel Nine used AI-generated actors in a promo for its TV history series, drawing public criticism, while a Chris Kenny documentary explored right-wing voter dynamics with Pauline Hanson. The ABC apologized to Vikki Campion for enabling harmful comments on a sensitive postpartum depression video, and politicians were mocked for cringe social media stunts involving Ooshies and Dolly Parton covers.

Guardian Australia
2 min read
More on this topictobacco excise