Breaking
TRBREAKING NEWS: Türkiye warning at the Israel conference! 'The ring of fire is rapidly enveloping'RUThe Russian Ministry of Defense announced a “double knockout” for the Ukrainian Armed ForcesRUUnmanned danger mode introduced in YamalKR[Yonhap News headlines at this time] - 14:30CRYPTO-ENBinance to shut down crypto mining pool services in NovemberTRMeteorology announced: October 13, 2026 weather report... What will the weather be like today?CNITF Taiwan International Travel Fair debuts in November! 25% off early bird tickets go on sale tomorrow "The scale of the Japan pavilion reaches a new high"DENew student protests: like an accelerant in France's crisisDEStart of the budget debate: "France has its back against the wall financially"KRCentral Asia app halts after Ukrainian drone hits Russian data centerTRBREAKING NEWS: Türkiye warning at the Israel conference! 'The ring of fire is rapidly enveloping'RUThe Russian Ministry of Defense announced a “double knockout” for the Ukrainian Armed ForcesRUUnmanned danger mode introduced in YamalKR[Yonhap News headlines at this time] - 14:30CRYPTO-ENBinance to shut down crypto mining pool services in NovemberTRMeteorology announced: October 13, 2026 weather report... What will the weather be like today?CNITF Taiwan International Travel Fair debuts in November! 25% off early bird tickets go on sale tomorrow "The scale of the Japan pavilion reaches a new high"DENew student protests: like an accelerant in France's crisisDEStart of the budget debate: "France has its back against the wall financially"KRCentral Asia app halts after Ukrainian drone hits Russian data center
Back家里翻新、门店装修产生的碎砖、水泥块,怎么处理才合规?
家里翻新、门店装修产生的碎砖、水泥块,怎么处理才合规?
Urgent
中国新闻网2 hours agoLaw3 min readChinaView translation

家里翻新、门店装修产生的碎砖、水泥块,怎么处理才合规?

Quick Look

珠海经济特区建筑垃圾管理条例将于2026年10月15日施行,首次为装饰装修垃圾设专章管理,明确产生单位和个人需提前告知管理人、分类收集、委托清运并支付费用,禁止混入生活垃圾或擅自倾倒堆放,违者将面临警告、罚款甚至拘留等处罚。

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

珠海经济特区建筑垃圾管理条例于2026年6月30日经珠海市第十届人民代表大会常务委员会第四十六次会议通过,将于同年10月15日施行,是首次专门针对装饰装修垃圾作出系统管理规定的地方性法规。

Font size

装修垃圾,别想一扔了之

《珠海经济特区建筑垃圾管理条例》将于10月15日施行,违规倾倒装修垃圾将面临处罚

家里翻新、门店装修产生的碎砖、水泥块、废板材,该怎么处理才合规?《珠海经济特区建筑垃圾管理条例》(以下简称《条例》)首次为装饰装修垃圾管理单设专章,从垃圾投放、收集清运到违法处罚作出明确规定,为装修垃圾处理提供了清晰指引。

《条例》已于2026年6月30日经珠海市第十届人民代表大会常务委员会第四十六次会议通过,将于2026年10月15日起正式施行。

《条例》明确,装饰装修垃圾,是指按照国家规定无需办理施工许可的房屋在装饰装修过程中,产生的弃土、弃料和其他废弃物。通俗讲就是住宅、店铺、办公楼等室内翻新、修缮时,敲下来的碎砖、混凝土块、废瓷砖、废板材、水泥袋等固体废物,都属于装饰装修垃圾。

《条例》建立了一套装饰装修垃圾管理人制度,把监管关口前移到小区和建筑内部。其中,实施物业管理的住宅小区管理人为物业服务人;机关、团体、学校及其他企事业单位管理人为本单位;经营场所、公共场所及其他场所管理人为经营管理单位或产权人;无法按上述确定的,由镇、街指定管理人。

对装饰装修垃圾产生单位和个人,《条例》明确了一个要求、三项义务、一个便利:在装饰装修活动开工前,将装修时间、地点、规模等信息告知管理人。将装饰装修垃圾单独收集,不得混入生活垃圾;自行或者委托物业服务人,将装饰装修垃圾交由建筑垃圾运输单位清运或投放至临时堆放点,并支付清运费用;不得擅自倾倒、堆放、丢弃、抛撒、遗撒或焚烧装饰装修垃圾。按照《条例》规定,投放装饰装修垃圾无需办理建筑垃圾排放核准。

《条例》要求各区城市管理综合执法部门与镇、街结合实际情况设置装饰装修垃圾临时堆放点,提供暂存、清运等便民服务。临时堆放点的设置也有讲究:要方便投放、利于保洁,不妨碍交通安全、不影响居民生产生活、不占用绿地。镇、街要向社会公布临时堆放点的具体位置和运营单位,并及时更新;运营单位要在堆放点现场设置公示牌,公示建筑垃圾运输单位和清运费用收取标准,并采取必要的防尘、防溢措施。此外,鼓励各区上线预约收运的便民小程序,居民在手机上就能预约清运,少跑腿、更省心。

如将装饰装修垃圾混入生活垃圾的,根据《城市建筑垃圾管理规定》第二十条,将建筑垃圾混入生活垃圾的,由城市人民政府市容环境卫生主管部门责令限期改正,给予警告,对单位处3000元以下罚款,个人处200元以下罚款。如擅自倾倒、堆放、丢弃、抛撒、遗撒或者焚烧装饰装修垃圾的,根据《中华人民共和国生态环境法典》第一千一百六十九条,个人擅自倾倒、堆放、丢弃、抛撒、遗撒、焚烧个人产生的生活垃圾、建筑垃圾的,由环境卫生主管部门责令改正,处一百元以上一千元以下的罚款;《中华人民共和国生态环境法典》第一千一百七十九条,擅自倾倒、堆放、丢弃、抛撒、遗撒、焚烧固体废物,造成严重后果,由公安机关对法定代表人、主要负责人、直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员处十日以上十五日以下拘留;情节较轻的,处五日以上十日以下拘留;《城市建筑垃圾管理规定》第二十六条,任何单位和个人随意倾倒、抛撒或者堆放建筑垃圾的,由城市人民政府市容环境卫生主管部门责令限期改正,给予警告,并对单位处5000元以上5万元以下罚款,对个人处200元以下罚款。简单来说,合法合规、按章投放的居民不受影响;想钻空子偷倒乱倒的,将被依法处罚。

羊城晚报记者 郑达

Open Questions

  • 条例施行后,实际执行力度如何?
  • 临时堆放点的覆盖范围和数量是否足以满足需求?
  • 物业服务人和经营管理单位作为管理人,是否具备足够的执行能力和资源?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by 中国新闻网.

Related Stories

Gong Yiting's sexual assault case goes to trial for the second time. The judge will examine the conversation records between the female artist and Gong's mother
Developing·

Gong Yiting's sexual assault case goes to trial for the second time. The judge will examine the conversation records between the female artist and Gong's mother

Gong Yiting, the son of former senior deputy general manager of Sanli TV Gong Meifu, was accused by a female artist of sexually assaulting him by administering a sedative. In June, prosecutors charged him with forced sexual intercourse but did not prosecute him for the drugging part. The female artist's request to participate in the lawsuit was approved, and the Taipei District Court will inspect the conversation records between her and Gong's mother Zhao Ruyu on the communication software.

自由时报
2 min read
Zhang Xuanhao, the first judge to be dismissed from office for drunk driving! He was transferred to a service officer and hit a passerby while driving drunk again. He was punished and suspended for 1 year.
Law·

Zhang Xuanhao, the first judge to be dismissed from office for drunk driving! He was transferred to a service officer and hit a passerby while driving drunk again. He was punished and suspended for 1 year.

Former Yilan District Court judge Zhang Xuanhao was dismissed from his duties as a judge for the first time due to three drunk driving accidents. After being transferred to a judicial affairs officer, he drove drunk again and injured a passerby. The disciplinary court ordered him to suspend his duties for one year, and he can appeal.

自由时报
2 min read
The justice’s legal opinion charges royalties! Intellectual property lawyers battle with copyright scholars, exciting attacks and defenses exposed
Developing·

The justice’s legal opinion charges royalties! Intellectual property lawyers battle with copyright scholars, exciting attacks and defenses exposed

Justices Cai Zongzhen, Yang Huiqin, and Zhu Fumei of the Judicial Yuan have long refused to participate in the review, but issued "disagreement with the legal opinion" in the name of the justices and authorized legal sources to pay for inclusion, triggering a Facebook debate between lawyer Fan Guohua and copyright expert Zhang Zhongxin. Fan Guohua questioned whether he was abusing public resources by using his job title for publishing and charging without comment, citing the analogy of the 33 yuan electric cooker case; Zhang Zhongxin believed that the document was a personal creation and the use of job titles was a separate issue. The two sides debated the ownership of documents and the appropriateness of their positions, involving copyright, the distinction between public and private matters, and official ethics.

自由时报
3 min read
Fund companies rely on the advantages of App technology to force a change in dispute resolution methods. Court: Invalid!
Law·

Fund companies rely on the advantages of App technology to force a change in dispute resolution methods. Court: Invalid!

83-year-old Ms. Fang was forced to accept the arbitration clause after the fund company’s app was upgraded, otherwise she would not be able to use the app. The court found that this coercive method violated the principle of voluntary arbitration, and the arbitration agreement was not effective for investors. It upheld the first-instance ruling that rejected the fund company manager’s objection.

中国新闻网
3 min read
Refuse to comment for more than 300 days, but express different opinions despite holding the title/Three justices also collected royalties, judicial report
Developing·

Refuse to comment for more than 300 days, but express different opinions despite holding the title/Three justices also collected royalties, judicial report

Justices Cai Zongzhen, Yang Huiqin and Zhu Fumei refused to participate in the deliberations of the Constitutional Court for more than 300 days, but later expressed their personal opinions in the form of a "Legal Opinion of Disagreement", which was published in the magazine "Taiwan Lawyer" and authorized to be downloaded by Fayuan Legal Network for a fee. This triggered controversy over judicial ethics and copyright. Fayuan.com has removed the relevant article, and other legal circles have reported and requested investigation.

自由时报
2 min read
Scholar: Violates judge ethics and confuses private and referee opinions
Developing·

Scholar: Violates judge ethics and confuses private and referee opinions

Justices Cai Zongzhen, Yang Huiqin and Zhu Fumei refused to participate in the deliberations of the Constitutional Court, but issued legal opinions with the title of justice and authorized paid downloads. They were reported to the Judicial Yuan by members of the legal profession. Scholars Zhang Jiayin and Su Yantu criticized his behavior as violating judge ethics and confusing private comments with formal judgment opinions, which may weaken the authority of the Constitutional Court and affect the fairness of the trial.

自由时报
2 min read
More on this topic珠海