
In a popular referendum, Swiss voters rejected an initiative aimed at tightening the country's constitutional neutrality by 71%, and they also rejected by 72% another initiative that sought to raise the rate of food self-sufficiency to 70% within ten years.
AI-generated summary
The Swiss constitution from 1848 stipulates neutrality. Switzerland's accession to sanctions against Russia has sparked debate about the nature of this neutrality.
On Sunday - as expected - the Swiss rejected a popular initiative aimed at tightening their country's neutrality, and which has the support of the nationalist right, while its opponents described it as pro-Russian, according to preliminary estimates after the closing of the polls.
The sponsors of this project sought, according to a mechanism known as the Popular Initiative, to include in the constitution articles that strengthen Switzerland’s neutrality, by prohibiting any alliance between it and a military organization, and any adoption of economic sanctions against a third country, except for those decided by the United Nations.
The text was rejected by a wide majority of 71 percent, according to preliminary estimates published by the GSF Bern opinion polling institute, shortly after the closing of the last polling stations.
Socialist MP Laurenleman Riel said in a statement to the official RTS channel that this shows that “the Swiss are still adhering to the policy of neutrality, which allows Switzerland to impose sanctions and take a position on the international scene.” Since 1848, the Federal Constitution stipulates Switzerland's neutrality, which is rooted centuries ago in its history. On this basis, it refrains from taking sides in wars between other countries.
However, Switzerland's implementation of the sanctions imposed by the European Union on Moscow after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as well as its assumption of a non-permanent membership in the UN Security Council for the first time between 2023 and 2024, have sparked controversy regarding the issue of its neutrality.
Two different visions of Swiss neutrality emerge. Advocates of flexible neutrality see the need for Switzerland to be able to adapt its policy to circumstances, a logic that led it to cooperate, for example, with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) without being a member of it. Swiss Foreign Minister Ignacio Cassis recently told Swiss public radio that neutrality “has always been used with a margin of freedom of movement.” He also saw during the campaign that “neutrality does not mean that Switzerland turns a blind eye when a violation of international rules occurs.”
On the other hand, the owner of the popular initiative, the Pro Suisse organization, which has an opposition orientation to European integration, adopts a more stringent vision of the concept of neutrality, and its project, which was put to a referendum, received support from the “Center Democratic Union,” a right-wing nationalist party that constitutes the largest political force in Switzerland. In a statement to public television, the party's vice president, Member of Parliament Celine Amoudroz, said, "Switzerland has an essential role to play on this planet." She added: “It's that white spot that we want to be, it's neutrality.” What we want is peace, diplomacy and dialogue. In order for us to do this, we must enjoy credibility through constant neutrality.”
The initiative was welcomed by Moscow, which accuses Bern of abandoning its neutrality by following Brussels' sanctions.
The Center Democratic Union was the only one among the major parties to support the initiative. After the first opinion polls showed a convergence in the percentages of supporters and opponents of the project, the last two polls published last week showed that a large majority of voters, exceeding 60 percent, reject the initiative, and thus adopt the government’s position.
Preliminary figures reported that 72 percent of the Swiss rejected another initiative aimed at enhancing Switzerland's food production, in an effort to reduce its dependence on abroad. This initiative, which is behind a non-partisan citizen movement, aims to raise the rate of food self-sufficiency from 42 percent in 2024 to 70 percent within 10 years, an ambition that the government considers extremely difficult. Rather, it is impossible.
The main parties also believe that this goal lacks realism, and urge its rejection, with the exception of the Green Party, which did not issue any voting recommendation. Sheldon Maseraz, vice president of the Green Youth Party, which supported the initiative, said in a statement to Swiss television on Sunday: “The goal was to achieve 70 percent self-sufficiency within 10 years.” “I think this goal raised reservations among many.”

Fatma Betul Sayan Kaya, Vice-President of the Justice and Development Party, resigned after the opposition accused her and her husband of involvement in manipulating the shares of investment funds on the Istanbul Stock Exchange, which led to the freezing of 131 funds and the imposition of precautionary judicial measures on their funds.

7 people were killed and 40 injured in an air strike in the city of Taiz, amid an exchange of accusations between the Yemeni government and the Houthis, an escalation of military operations in several Yemeni governorates, and the Houthis announcing the downing of a Saudi drone.

The General Union of Teachers in Libya has escalated its strike to demand improved salaries and health insurance, while opposition parties in Algeria are warning of a reluctance to run in local elections due to legal ambiguity in the conditions for candidacy.

Yemeni government forces intensified their air and artillery strikes against the Houthis in Taiz and Lahj, as field confrontations continue. This coincided with government warnings that the Houthis were using modified air defense weapons to threaten international air navigation, amid a sharp deterioration in the health and humanitarian situation.

Opposition parties in Algeria have warned of a widespread reluctance to run in the local elections scheduled for November 28, due to fears of the application of Article 184 of the electoral law, which allows the exclusion of candidates on the grounds of their connections to financial circles and suspicious businesses.

Fears are increasing in the Kurdistan region of Iraq about the consequences of the international coalition’s withdrawal, amid warnings of a security vacuum. In parallel, Lebanon is awaiting the results of the meeting between Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio regarding the future of negotiations with Israel.