
An international committee identifies threats including climate change, artificial intelligence and pandemics, stressing that immediate action by leaders can avoid the worst.
A study published in The Lancet warns of 17 interconnected catastrophic threats to global health until 2100, including nuclear conflict and artificial intelligence, stressing that targeted action by world leaders can avoid the worst-case scenarios.
AI-generated summary
A panel of 35 leaders estimated total years of good health lost globally due to 17 threats based on global burden of disease data.
(CNN) - More than a dozen interconnected catastrophic threats pose a major threat to global health and well-being during the remainder of the 21st century, but purposeful action by world leaders may help avoid the worst-case scenarios, researchers report.
A panel of 35 leaders from diverse sectors estimated the total years of good health that the world's population would lose to disease, disability or premature death from a range of threats, based on data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation's Global Burden of Disease study.
Their findings, published in The Lancet, identified 17 threats that pose the greatest risk but are also subject to effective intervention.
These threats include health conditions and behavioral patterns, such as obesity, high blood pressure, smoking, and mental health problems, as well as economic conditions, environmental changes, technology, and conflict.
The panel concluded that together these threats could cause the equivalent of tens of billions of years of health lost if current trends continue.
“The striking finding lies not only in the magnitude of these threats, but also in the fact that humanity still has the capacity to take effective action,” said co-chair of the new commission and director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, Dr. Christopher Murray.
He added in a statement: “For all 17 catastrophic threats, the decisions leaders make today will shape the health and well-being of the next generation. But postponing action will only shift and increase costs into the future.”
The committee also concluded that there are two threats that could lead to extinction or extinction: nuclear conflict and the malicious use of artificial intelligence.
Last month, IPO documents for artificial intelligence company Anthropic indicated that its models could pose a “catastrophic or existential risk to humanity,” and industry insiders have warned that artificial intelligence could lead to the extinction of the entire human race, perhaps within this decade.
Estimates from different agencies, which collaborated with The Lancet's new commission, also showed "significant variation" in assessing disaster risks associated with artificial intelligence, the new report says.
But the panelists also point out that the emergence of powerful AI systems is an example of “how quickly assumptions about stability collapse,” along with evidence from other “recent global shocks,” including the coronavirus pandemic, the ongoing Ebola outbreak in Africa, and accelerating climate impacts.
The amount of healthy life years potentially lost due to the malicious use of AI is estimated at 10.4 billion years globally by 2100, roughly the same as the risk from other threats, such as pandemics and obesity.
But since there has not yet been “a global AI-related event,” estimates of risks associated with this area remain only theoretical, while risks associated with obesity are based on real-world data.
The goal of the new commission is not to prioritize threats, but to “catalyze international, regional and national action to protect and advance the future of health and humanity,” according to a related editorial in The Lancet.
“Recent global events show us how quickly stability can turn into a crisis, and how costly it is to respond to events only after disaster strikes,” explains Dr. Natalia Kanem, former Executive Director of UNFPA and co-chair of the new commission. “Global health threats may also exacerbate existing inequalities, with the greatest burdens falling on the most vulnerable communities. However, the future is not preordained.”
She continued: “Governments and societies must act decisively, starting today, to protect health and build a more just, peaceful and secure future for future generations.”
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Motivating the international and national movement to protect the healthy future based on the committee’s report
Likely · Within months

Pope Leo

An American study that included nearly 200,000 people showed that eating late at night increases the risk of liver diseases, including fatty liver and cirrhosis, by 20 to 30 percent compared to people who do not eat during that period, due to the disruption of the biological clock and its effect on nighttime metabolic processes.

Germany recorded 11,334 suicides in 2025, an increase of 9.3% over the previous year. Experts have warned of the impact and normalization of assisted suicide, calling for strengthening prevention and tightening legal frameworks to prevent the exploitation of death as a business model.

Recent studies have revealed that strict and authoritarian upbringing increases the risk of children developing depression and behavioral disorders, with indications of possible genetic influences, emphasizing the importance of emotional support and setting clear boundaries for sound upbringing.

After the Lindsay Clancy case, women like Dr Esty Rollhaus began to speak out about their struggles with postpartum psychosis, highlighting the inability of the medical system to provide adequate treatment and the lack of specialist facilities for mothers.

An international study published in the journal Science Translational Medicine showed that analyzing about 1,500 proteins in the blood in conjunction with genetic data helps uncover the possible causes of rare diseases that genome sequencing alone could not diagnose.