AI-generated summary
The CDU is in a party crisis, with internal wings such as the CDA critically questioning the party's reform course. Radtke represents the socially oriented wing of the CDU and warns of a loss of social acceptance due to perceived austerity programs.
Dennis Radtke, head of the CDU social wing CDA, warned before the conclusion of the CDU presidium meeting that the reform course would lose social acceptance. "The concerns are overwhelming. This is a driver for the AfD because we are obviously not giving the right answers or are not currently giving any answers," he said in the "Berlin Playbook Podcast" of the WELT partner publication "Politico".
He warned that the reforms could be perceived by the population as merely austerity programs. He is particularly critical of the health care reform: “This is primarily an austerity program,” said the CDA boss. However, he rated the pension reform positively.
In another interview with the “Tagesspiegel” he called on Chancellor Merz to “correct course”. It is “part of Merz’s leadership responsibility to honestly analyze the situation and realistically classify his approval ratings among the population.”
Radtke complained about the CDU's thematic narrowing, which was to blame for the current party crisis. According to Radtke, the interpretation of “pure CDU” as “purely conservative and economically liberal” has “failed”.
The politician from North Rhine-Westphalia warned against further driving forward the polarization of society: The “business model of the Christian Democrats” is to bring together different positions in an open, liberal society. “Polarization and adding fuel to the fire only pays off for the AfD,” said Radtke. "We cannot beat them with their weapons. Our weapon is the balancing of interests." This comes directly from the Christian view of humanity.
Radtke also criticized the CDU for baseless and false promises that had been made in the past. “Things were promised that were subsequently not implemented,” he said. “On the other hand, we sometimes promise something different than what the population expects.”
Union parliamentary group deputy Günter Krings (CDU) warns against a departure from the previous line of demarcation from the AfD and criticizes the term “firewall” as being poorly chosen. He emphasizes that cooperation with the AfD is incompatible with the CDU's basic values. He also expresses doubts about the fairness of the current retirement age of 64.5 years and argues that mainly healthy and well-provided people would benefit from it.

Friedrich Merz is supposedly presenting the results of the CDU presidential retreat, while at the same time criticism is coming from the party, the Federal Constitutional Court is negotiating inheritance tax and political developments are being discussed in Berlin and New York.
The resumption of diesel trade between the USA and Russia through a deal between Trump and Putin leads to sharp criticism from the CDU, the Greens and the Left in the Bundestag, while the AfD and BSW praise the agreement as a model. Critics warn about financing the war in Ukraine and a lack of relief for consumers, supporters see economic reason and relief with high energy prices.
After the state elections in the east and in Berlin, the federal government is under pressure. Markus Söder emphasizes the need for a common political goal, criticizes the AfD as “brutally right-wing” and calls for clear consequences for Union MPs who vote differently. Christoph Werner and Julia Löhr discuss economic growth, national debt and political reforms.

CSU leader Markus Söder has called on Union MPs who vote for the AfD to publicly resign from the party after AfD candidate Tobias Rausch was elected state parliament president in Saxony-Anhalt. He warned of instability in the federal government and emphasized that Friedrich Merz would remain Chancellor while he supported Ilse Aigner's candidacy for Federal President.
Federal Judge Jennifer L. Rochon in New York has granted a lawsuit by Common Cause and others and ordered the government to stop airing Department of Homeland Security commercials funded with public funds for two weeks. The judge saw possible unlawful use of state resources for political propaganda because one spot resembled a Trump 2024 campaign video.