中欧数字环境下版权保护研讨会13日在银川举办,聚焦数字环境下的版权治理、中欧版权立法与执法实践、生成式人工智能时代版权保护等议题,探讨数字技术变革下版权保护新挑战与新路径,促进中欧理解互信与协同合作。
AI-generated summary
中国一直致力于加强国际版权保护合作,积极参与全球版权治理,先后加入多个重要国际公约,批准《视听表演北京条约》和《马拉喀什条约》,并与世界知识产权组织保持常态化合作。
中新网银川10月14日电 由中国国家版权局、欧盟中国知识产权项目联合主办的中欧数字环境下版权保护研讨会13日在宁夏银川举办。
中欧数字环境下版权保护研讨会现场。 主办方供图
中国一直致力于加强国际版权保护合作,积极参与全球版权治理。多边层面,先后加入了多个重要国际公约,相继批准《视听表演北京条约》和《马拉喀什条约》,彰显中国作为版权大国的责任与担当。与世界知识产权组织保持常态化合作,持续举办系列国际版权交流活动。双边层面,与多国版权主管机构的对话机制按期推进,中欧版权领域的交流对话持续走深走实。
研讨会聚焦数字环境下的版权治理、中欧版权立法与执法实践、生成式人工智能时代版权保护等前沿议题,共同探讨数字技术变革下版权保护新挑战、新路径,促进中欧在版权领域的理解互信与协同合作。研讨会包括三个议题,分别是中欧版权立法进展与执法实践分享,生成式人工智能时代的版权,网络环境下的版权执法实践与挑战。
会议认为,当前,全球人工智能技术迭代加速,生成式人工智能持续催生新场景、新业态、新模式、新市场,在赋能经济社会进步的同时,也带来新的安全风险与版权治理难题。数字网络环境下侵权行为跨地域传播特征凸显,这是各国版权监管、案件调查取证、跨境侵权处置等执法实践的共同考验。版权如何助力人工智能领域发展,平衡好各方的关系?对此,一是要重视和拥抱人工智能,以前瞻、积极的思维迎接人工智能带来的变革。二是研究和规范人工智能,以《著作权法实施条例》修订为契机,完善配套制度设计,探索构建适配人工智能场景的版权规则。持续加强AI生成内容传播监测,妥善处置相关版权投诉举报,依法保护著作权人合法权益。三是交流与共享人工智能治理经验,持续加强对话交流,共同维护全球版权秩序,推动新技术惠及全人类。
中国国家版权局版权管理局局长王志成,宁夏回族自治区党委宣传部副部长、自治区新闻出版局(版权局)局长翟军,欧盟中国知识产权项目负责人艾罗博士出席研讨会并致辞。
世界知识产权组织代表、国家版权主管部门领导、地方版权工作负责人、欧盟知识产权项目专家、国内外法学学者、行业协会代表等100余人参会。(完)
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
中国将以《著作权法实施条例》修订为契机,完善适配人工智能场景的版权规则
Likely · Within months
中欧将持续加强对话交流,共同维护全球版权秩序
Very likely · Within months

The civil compensation debate in the neck-cutting case of a junior high school student in New Taipei City has ended, and the Civil Division of the High Court is scheduled to pronounce the verdict on November 25. The defense lawyer questioned whether the victim's family's donation of 5 million yuan in scholarships and bursaries was a deliberate transfer of assets. The victim's father, Yang Chengxun, responded angrily, emphasizing that the donation was used to help underprivileged students and was never used for personal use. He also questioned whether the argument that the victim's family would be exempted from liability for compensation if they receive social donations is reasonable.

The Supreme People's Court issued a typical case on the protection of new plant varieties, involving a blueberry seedling infringement dispute. A certain planting base claimed to have stolen branches through connections and produced and sold the Spanish Praburu 1542 blueberry variety without permission. The court determined that it constituted "a business based on infringement" and applied punitive damages. It upheld the original judgment of compensating economic losses of 144,000 yuan and rights protection expenses of 10,000 yuan.

AI deep forgery technology reduces the cost and threshold for forging evidence, leading to biases in evidence review by judicial personnel, rising litigation costs, and declining judicial efficiency. Judicial organs are building a full-chain evidence review model through technical means, institutional norms and expert assistance to meet the challenges.

A divorced man in Taitung was accused by his underage daughter of multiple sexual assaults between 108 and 110 years. However, the daughter’s testimony was inconsistent and was influenced by her uncle’s inductive questioning. The court certification was tainted and could not be used as evidence. He was found not guilty in the first and second trials. It was emphasized that the acquittal was based on insufficient evidence and did not deny the trauma suffered by the victim.

An incident in which laundry beads stuck to moisture and exploded after being torn apart by hand, causing the washing liquid to spray into the eyes and causing corneal burns, has attracted attention. The reporter's investigation found that only one of the ten laundry beads was labeled with the warning "Do not tear by hand after the beads have adhered." Experts point out that alkaline detergents are more harmful to the eyes, so they should immediately rinse with water for 30 minutes and seek medical attention. If consumers are injured due to insufficient warning, they can claim compensation from the manufacturer in accordance with the law, but they need to make prejudgmental judgments based on design and use.

On the 13th, the New Taipei Prosecutor's Office charged the New Taipei Prosecutor's Office for violating the Personal Information Law, publicly insulting and defaming the man named Xin, who posted his past criminal conviction record, life photos and residence information on a social platform, and insinuated that he was a "pedophile grass". Sijimao responded humorously to this and said that he was prosecuted earlier than Ko Wenzhe.