
The trial of the lawyer, who was tried on the grounds that he rejected the court panel serving with religious symbols, was postponed until October 22.
AI-generated summary
During a hearing on May 14, 2024, the defendants rejected the court on the grounds that they were wearing a headscarf. The prosecutor's office evaluated this action as insulting religious values and abuse of office.
The detained defendant Alperen Demirdiş and his lawyer attended the hearing at Ankara 11th High Criminal Court. After the document in the case file was read, Demirdiş, who was given the floor, stated that he did not accept the accusations made against him and argued that his words remained within the scope of defense immunity.
Arguing that the element of damage was not fully disclosed in the indictment, Demirdiş said that he could make a detailed defense if this element was disclosed.
THE PROSECUTOR WANTED THE DEFENDANT TO BE PUNISHED
Announcing his opinion on the merits after the defendant's statements, the prosecutor demanded that Demirdiş be punished for "abuse of office" and "publicly insulting the religious values adopted by a segment of the public".
Demirdiş, who requested time to defend against the opinion, also requested that the prosecution be expanded. The defendant's lawyer argued that the indictment was not sufficiently descriptive and requested acquittal.
Announcing its interim decision, the court decided to give Demirdiş time to prepare his defense against the opinion and postponed the hearing to 22 October.
WHAT HAPPENED?
The incident took place at a hearing at Ankara 1st High Criminal Court on May 14, 2024. It was recorded that Demirdiş, the lawyer of a defendant who is on trial for "trafficking or supplying drugs", took the floor at the hearing and said, "The Republic of Turkey is a secular state of law. The independence of the court is guaranteed in the Constitution. I reject the president and member of the court who serve with religious symbols."
In the indictment prepared by the Ankara West Chief Public Prosecutor's Office, it was stated that Demirdiş requested a recusal judge, stating that the head of the court panel and the member judge could not attend the hearing while wearing a headscarf. It was stated that the judge's wearing of a headscarf is not among the "situations in which the judge cannot look" regulated in Article 22 of the Code of Criminal Procedure No. 5271 and the "reasons for the judge's rejection" in Article 24.
A prison sentence of 6 months to 2 years was requested for Demirdiş for "abuse of office" and a prison sentence of 6 months to 1 year for "publicly insulting the religious values adopted by a segment of the public".
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The case will continue on October 22, 2024.
Very likely · Within months

Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office decided to block access to Halk TV's YouTube,

A US court has granted access to interview records of former Apple employees during the OpenAI hiring process. While Apple claimed that confidential technical information was transferred, the court gave OpenAI 5 to 14 days to deliver the documents.

The trial of lawyer Alperen Demirdiş, who objected to the court panel's decision to wear a headscarf and requested recusal, was postponed to 22 October, with a time for defense against the opinion on the merits, at the Ankara 11th High Criminal Court.

43 people died and 5 people were injured as a result of the collapse of the 6-year-old Selim Köse Apartment in Odabaşı District of Hatay's Antakya district during the February 6 earthquakes. The complainant lawyers demanded the arrest of the defendants and a new expert report, and the defendant lawyers brought up the contradictions in the reports. The court rejected the requests for arrest and new report and postponed the hearing to December 2.

In the case regarding Emlakbank 1st Stage Residences, where 169 people lost their lives in the February 6 earthquakes in Hatay, the court rejected the request for a new expert report and postponed the hearing.

Assoc. Dr. In the case involving 10 defendants regarding the assassination of Necip Hablemitoğlu in 2002, the defendants and their lawyers demanded that judicial control measures be lifted and the ongoing investigation be waited for its conclusion.