DOJ won't rule out Jan. 6 rioters getting paid from new fund
Quick Look
- Acting AG Todd Blanche wouldn't rule out Jan.
- 6 rioters seeking funds from a new $1.8B DOJ "Anti-Weaponization Fund." Democrats criticized the fund as a "slush fund" for Trump allies.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faced questions regarding a new $1.8 billion Department of Justice fund intended to compensate individuals claiming political targeting. The fund was announced as part of an agreement with Donald Trump, who dropped a lawsuit against the IRS over leaked tax returns.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche on Tuesday would not rule out allowing people convicted of assaulting police officers during the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot to seek payments from a new Department of Justice fund created to compensate people who claim they were politically targeted by the Biden administration.
Pressed at a Senate appropriations subcommittee hearing, Blanche said, "anybody in this country can apply" to a new $1.8 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" and said a commission would decide the rules for who can receive compensation.
"The commission will set the rules," Blanche said when asked whether members of the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers or others convicted of attacking Capitol Police officers could receive payments. "That's not for me to set. That's for the commissioners."
Blanche also declined to commit that donors to President Donald Trump's campaigns would be excluded from the fund, saying only that the payments would be governed by the settlement agreement.
When asked, "Will you commit that none of President Trump's family will receive a direct payout from this fund?" Blanche replied, "Yes."
The exchange came a day after the DOJ announced the fund as part of an agreement with Trump that included him dropping his $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns.
Democrats on the panel criticized Blanche for the fund.
"This all seems to be an obvious abuse of power by the Department of Justice, by the president," Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., told Blanche. "You're his appointee, the IRS are his appointees, he's the plaintiff, and the American people, I don't think, are surprised that suddenly all this money is going to his friends or people that he has in his orbit."
The DOJ on Monday said the fund will create a process for people who claim they were victims of "weaponization and lawfare" to seek financial compensation or formal apologies.
The hearing also touched on the resignation of Treasury Department General Counsel Brian Morrissey, which has been reported as lined to the fund's creation, though CNBC has not confirmed the reason.
Asked whether it was a coincidence that Morrissey resigned the same day Treasury was required to certify the payments, Blanche said, "I don't know if it's a coincidence," adding that he had not checked why Morrissey resigned.
A Treasury spokesperson told CNBC: "As general counsel, Brian Morrissey has served the United States Treasury with both honor and integrity. We wish him all the best in his next endeavors."
Democrats and government watchdogs are denouncing the fund as a taxpayer-backed "slush fund" to reward Trump allies.
Blanche rejected that characterization Tuesday, pushing back on the claim that Trump had created a fund that would allow his appointees to decide which political allies receive taxpayer-funded payments.
"It's not a slush fund," Blanche said. "It's been done many times."
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The commission will establish rules for the "Anti-Weaponization Fund" that may or may not explicitly exclude individuals convicted of assaulting police officers.
Likely · Within weeks
Further political debate and scrutiny will surround the "Anti-Weaponization Fund" and its beneficiaries.
Very likely · Within months
Open Questions
- Will individuals convicted of assaulting police officers on Jan. 6 be eligible for compensation from the fund?
- What specific rules will the commission set for fund eligibility?
- Will donors to Trump's campaigns be excluded from the fund?
- What is the exact reason for Brian Morrissey's resignation from the Treasury Department?






