
They bought the land with the consent of the authorities, but the transaction was canceled due to the bankruptcy of the previous owner.
AI-generated summary
A married couple from the USA bought a farm in Poland, which years later was recognized as part of the bankruptcy estate of the previous owner.
Jakub and Anita, US citizens, fell in love with the Polish countryside. A long journey through offices, collecting all possible permits, tedious preparation of documents - all this to turn the dream of having your own farm into reality in accordance with the law. Finally, after many years, in 2020, the land was officially transferred to their name.
The joy did not last long. An unexpected letter from the trustee started the avalanche - it was discovered that the previous owner was subject to bankruptcy proceedings. The court declared the transaction invalid, and the land for which the Amish paid honestly was reintroduced to the bankruptcy estate. The family farm went under the hammer, and the starting prices in subsequent tenders dropped to a bizarre level - from nearly PLN 900,000. PLN to... 213 thousand PLN - informs "Kurier Lubelski".
Right of first refusal – is this their salvation?
When the situation seemed doomed, Mr. and Mrs. Martin reached for an unexpected card - they discovered that they had the right of first refusal under the lease agreement. A document prepared a few years earlier, originally concluded due to the requirements of KRUS, suddenly became perhaps a key element in the court dispute.
When we sent the documents confirming the right of pre-emption, contact with the trustee stopped. We haven't received any response for two weeks, says Jakub Martin. The couple hopes that the right of pre-emption will give them a chance to regain the farm.
Trustee: I acted in accordance with the law
The bankruptcy trustee, Marcin Krzemiński, emphasizes that the entire procedure is carried out in accordance with the letter of the law. Basic allegation: the sale of the real estate did not obtain the consent of the temporary court supervisor. This was an activity beyond the scope of ordinary management, and the sale agreement was considered invalid by the court - explains the trustee to "Kurier Lubelski".
Klaudia Przeździecka, a legal trainee at a law firm in Lublin, explains to the daily that even a fair transaction - with all permits and an entry in the land and mortgage register - may be considered invalid if the sale took place without the consent required by law.
Unfortunately, the good faith of buyers does not matter then, he emphasizes. However, there is hope: buyers are entitled to a refund and the possibility of seeking compensation for the investments made.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The court will consider the effectiveness of the right of pre-emption established by Mr. and Mrs. Martin.
Possible · Within months

On November 11, there is a ban on carrying and moving weapons in Warsaw. The regulation of the Ministry of Interior and Administration aims to ensure safety during Independence Day celebrations.

The Supreme Court overturned the order of October 30 on the immediate suspension of the duties of judges of the Constitutional Tribunal, Bogdan Święczkowski and Bartłomiej Sochański. The case was referred to the Chamber of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court. The decision also concerned the performance of the duties of the president and vice-president of the Constitutional Tribunal. Minister of Justice Waldemar Żurek referred to the decision on website X.

Judge Anna Korwin-Piotrowska informed that the selected judges are obliged to participate in the meetings of the disciplinary court assessing the orders to remove President Bogdan Święczkowski and Vice-President Bartłomiej Sochański. She announced that she would submit a request to initiate disciplinary proceedings against both judges for gross violations if other judges do not do so in the coming days. She emphasized that the order of October 30 is valid for 30 days and the randomly selected panel may repeal it.

The General Assembly of Judges of the Constitutional Tribunal will meet on November 17, 2026 to consider the Prosecutor General's requests to waive the immunities of judges Bogdan Święczkowski and Bartłomiej Sochański in connection with criminal charges.

The European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) has opened an investigation into irregularities in the use of EU funds for the safety of the Madrid-Seville railway line, where in October 2026 69 people died in a disaster.

The Supreme Court ruled that the Chamber of Professional Responsibility does not have the competence to consider the cases of judges of the Constitutional Tribunal. The case was referred back to the Constitutional Tribunal.