AI-generated summary
Electric scooter businesses have rapidly become widespread to provide short-distance transportation services within the city. However, the failure of some operators to comply with their authorization and permit obligations has created concerns in terms of security and regulation. This situation required updating official regulations.
The "Regulation on Amendments to the Electric Scooter Regulation" prepared by the Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure, the Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change and the Ministry of Internal Affairs was published in the Official Gazette.
Accordingly, an administrative fine of 86 thousand 900 liras will be imposed on electric scooter operators who operate in violation of their authorization and permit obligations.
If operators violate certain obligations regarding their activities, an administrative fine of 8 thousand 687 liras will be imposed.
If operators violate the determined limits on the number of scooters, gradual sanctions will be applied.
In this context, an administrative fine of 8 thousand 687 liras will be imposed for the first violation, 86 thousand 900 liras for the second violation and 170 thousand liras for the third violation. In case of a third violation, the operator's activities within the scope of the authorization certificate will be temporarily suspended for 6 months.
An administrative fine of 43 thousand 447 liras will be imposed on operators who violate certain obligations regarding customer services and mobile applications.
According to the regulation, an administrative fine of 50 thousand liras will be imposed on operators who do not provide the necessary information or documents to the inspection authorities. If this obligation is violated, the operators' activities within the scope of the authorization certificate will be temporarily suspended for 6 months.
The Regulation will enter into force as of the date of its publication and its provisions will be implemented jointly by the Minister of Transport and Infrastructure, the Minister of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change and the Minister of Internal Affairs.

Adana 33rd Criminal Court of First Instance issued a HAGB decision on April 16, 2026 for Ala Ferdosi, who was tried for intentional wounding in Adana on February 15, 2024. The decision was notified to the defendant, whose address could not be determined, by being published in a national newspaper and on an online news site.

T.R. Turgutlu 1st Civil Court of Peace, with its decision dated 21/09/2026 and numbered 2026/1038, Decision 2026/1546, decided to liquidate the estate of Gönül Gül (TR ID No: 21778835236) in accordance with the bankruptcy provisions in accordance with Article 612 of the TMK and gave instructions for the liquidation to be carried out in a simple manner. It has been declared that creditors must report their receivables and claims and pay within 30 days from the date of announcement.

Patnos 3rd Civil Court of First Instance made an announcement regarding the expropriation of the part of the real estate registered in the name of FETİ MARAL, numbered island 0, parcel 286, in Pirömer village of Patnos district of Ağrı province. The announcement states that, in accordance with the Expropriation Law No. 2942, a lawsuit can be filed within 30 days from the date of notification, and that the price will be paid to the Turkish Republic. It states that it will be deposited to the Vakıf Bank Patnos branch and that the defense and evidence will be notified within 10 days.

The house of detained defendant Murat Kapki in the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality case was searched again over the weekend. Lawyer Fikret Aras stated that this situation was necessary for the re-evaluation of his client's detention situation. The presiding judge said that the search of the house had nothing to do with the case.

At the Istanbul 33rd High Criminal Court, former Ağaç A.Ş. Purchasing Manager Selim Marangoz, the undetained defendant, argued that Ümit Polat demanded bribes from Ali Sukas during his tenure between January 2025 and May 2026, that purchases were made without tenders and that he did not claim any benefits. Orhan Yıldırım also explained that Ali Sukas demanded 10 percent commission and made money transfers as economic aid.

Gezi Park case convict Tayfun Kahraman announced his application to the Istanbul 13th High Criminal Court following the Constitutional Court's decision on violation of his right to a fair trial. Kahraman stated that he was waiting for the retrial process.