T.R. JUDGE OF ADANA 33RD CRIMINAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
Quick Look
- Adana 33rd Criminal Court of First Instance issued a HAGB decision on April 16, 2026 for Ala Ferdosi, who was tried for intentional wounding in Adana on February 15, 2024.
- The decision was notified to the defendant, whose address could not be determined, by being published in a national newspaper and on an online news site.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Ala Ferdosi was born in Aleppo on 01/01/2000 and lives in the Akkapı neighborhood of Adana. He is accused of intentional injury in Adana on February 15, 2024.
T.R. FROM ADANA 33RD CRIMINAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
Number: E.13452941-2024/410-Criminal Case File
Docket No: 2024/410
Decision No: 2026/242
DEFENDANT: ALA FERDOSİ, son of Ahmed and Vehbe, born in ALEPPO on 01/01/2000, lives at Akkapı Mahallesi 12463 Sokak No:11Seyhan/ ADANA. TR ID Number: 99374464624
CRIME: Intentional Injury
DATE OF CRIME: 15/02/2024
CRIME LOCATION: ADANA
DECISION DATE: 16/04/2026
Verdict Given: HAGB
To the participant whose address cannot be determined despite all research and whose address is unknown, whose identity and address information is written above, the summary of the written decision will be deemed to have been notified 7 days after its announcement in a national newspaper published in Turkey with a circulation of less than 50,000 and on the general internet news site, in accordance with the Notification Law 28 and subsequent articles, and it will be delivered to our court within 7 days from the date of notification, or will be referred to the Criminal Court of First Instance where it is located to be sent to our court. It is ANNOUNCED that the person may appeal to the relevant Criminal Chamber of the Adana Regional Court of Justice by petition or by making a statement to the Record Clerk to be recorded in the minutes and approved by the judge, and that the decision will become final if there is no legal application.
Open Questions
- What are the details of the intentional injury incident?
- Who are Vahit and Ahmed and what role do they play in this situation?
- Why can't the defendant's address be determined?
