
군사 동맹 협력 및 독자 제재 제한 골자의 개정안, 출구조사서 반대 71% 예측
A referendum was held in Switzerland on a constitutional amendment to 'strengthen neutrality' that strictly limits military alliance cooperation and independent sanctions, and exit polls show that 71% are opposed, so it is expected to be rejected.
AI-generated summary
Switzerland has maintained its status as a neutral country since 1815, but the government has interpreted it flexibly as the specific implementation method is not specified in the constitution. 우크라이나 전쟁 이후 대러시아 제재에 동참하면서 중립성 논란이 제기되었다.
It is expected that the 'neutrality strengthening' constitutional amendment in neutral Switzerland, which would strictly limit cooperation with military and defense alliances or participation in independent sanctions by the international community, will be rejected in a referendum.
According to AFP and Reuters on the 27th (local time), an exit poll by public broadcaster SRG and public opinion pollster GFS Bern immediately after the referendum on strengthening neutrality held in Switzerland on this day predicted that 71% of the opposition was predicted.
The key point of this referendum is to stipulate permanent military neutrality in the constitution and strictly limit the government's authority to arbitrarily interpret and implement neutrality depending on the situation.
If the amendment is passed, the Swiss government will be completely prohibited from imposing independent sanctions for reasons such as armed conflict unless there is a UN Security Council resolution.
Additionally, cooperation with military and defense alliances such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is only permitted in situations where Switzerland is directly attacked. In effect, this means that the status of a permanent neutral country will be further solidified in a closed manner.
Switzerland has been recognized as an internationally neutral country since immediately after the Napoleonic Wars in 1815. However, the Constitution does not specify how the government should implement this neutrality.
Previous Swiss governments have interpreted neutrality flexibly in accordance with the international situation. Although it does not join NATO or the European Union (EU), it participates limitedly in NATO's peace partnership or international peacekeeping missions.
The right-wing Swiss People's Party (SVP), which favors strengthening neutrality, argues that Switzerland's traditional neutral position has been shaken by its participation in sanctions against Russia due to the invasion of Ukraine. The pro-choice camp raised the slogan ‘Oppose war, pro-neutrality.’
The Swiss government has adopted most of the 20 sanctions packages against Russia announced by the EU since the outbreak of war in Ukraine in February 2022. This is a very different move from the country's refusal to participate in sanctions when Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimea peninsula in 2014, and some criticized Switzerland for abandoning its neutrality by siding with Ukraine.
On the other hand, the Swiss federal government and most political parties have strongly opposed this constitutional amendment.
“Neutrality has always been applied with a certain degree of flexibility,” Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis said in a recent TV debate. “Neutrality is not indifference.”
Regarding the exit poll results on this day, Green Party lawmaker Siebel Arsland said, "Voters have realized what the SVP wants," and added, "It is an attempt to isolate Switzerland internationally and avoid responsibility even in a situation where international law is being trampled."
Opposition prevailed in several opinion polls conducted before the referendum. A public opinion poll by public broadcasters SRG and GFS Bern showed 34% in favor and 63% opposed.
Fabio Wasserphalen, a professor of European politics at the University of Bern, told Reuters: "Swiss voters like neutrality, but they also approve of the way the current government is implementing neutrality."

President Lee Jae-myung returned to Korea on the 27th after completing a 5-night, 7-day visit to the United States and Mexico. Resolving numerous domestic and international issues, such as the launch of the Serious Crimes Investigation Office, resolution of cabinet reshuffle personnel failures, conflict with the judiciary and Supreme Court justice candidates, and response to the DMZ explosion accident, have emerged as urgent tasks.

First Lady Peng Liyuan, who accompanied Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to the United States, was evaluated as having enhanced China's soft power through soft diplomatic activities, including exchanges with First Lady Melania Trump. Chinese authorities emphasized this as a positive factor in improving US-China relations.

The '2026 World Korean Presidents' Conference', attended by about 380 Korean American presidents from around the world, opened at Songdo Convensia in Incheon. This year, it is the first competition where the authority of the private steering committee has been strengthened, and various current issues to foster the next generation and improve the rights of overseas Koreans will be discussed until the 29th.

President Lee Jae Myung returned to South Korea following a trip to the U.S. for the UN General Assembly and a state visit to Mexico, where he and President Claudia Sheinbaum signed 17 agreements on advanced industries including AI and defense.

President Lee Jae-myung said through social media that reform comes from the people's actions and practices, and called for critical thinking and daily participation. He also called for a dignified response to low-quality attacks and appealed for active support from his supporters.

President Lee Jae-myung returned to Korea after completing a 7-day, 5-night visit to the United States and Mexico. While reviewing the results of the ROK-US summit, it is expected to focus on resolving numerous domestic and international issues such as reorganizing the Blue House staff, resolving personnel failures, conflicts with the judiciary, and DMZ land mine accidents.