
Feijóo and Abascal criticize the management of bonuses at the Adif leadership after the railway tragedy in Toledo
The renewal of bonuses for the Adif leadership, a week after the Urda train accident, generates harsh criticism from the leaders of the PP and Vox, who demand political and judicial responsibilities in the face of suspicions of embezzlement.
AI-generated summary
Adif renewed the incentives of its management leadership a week after the train accident that occurred in Urda, Toledo. The event caused the temporary suspension of the electoral campaign by several parties.
The renewal of the incentive plan for the Adif management committee, which occurred this Wednesday, has shaken the resumption of the electoral campaign that the parties have been gradually carrying out this weekend, after the abrupt interruption due to the accident in Urda (Toledo).
"While Spain continues to recover from the terrible accident in Urda, at Adif they are focused on other things," the president of the PP, Alberto Núñez Feijóo, has written on his networks about the information that opens the front page of EL MUNDO today: that Adif shielded the bonus to its leadership only a week after the railway tragedy.
The leader of Vox, Santiago Abascal, has been tougher, the only political leader who did not suspend the campaign due to the accident. "What was the objective of Adif? What was the objective of Pedro Sánchez's cronies?" Abascal asked himself at a rally this Saturday in Guadalajara, and then launched: "Why doesn't Pedro Sánchez resign when he sees that everyone he has appointed is taking the money? In the middle of the massacre, in the middle of the dead."
The leader of Vox has criticized that, shortly before resigning, the president of the railway infrastructure manager had "made sure that the bonuses for the directors of Adif were signed." "What was the objective of the Adif leadership? Destroy high speed? Kill more than 100 Spaniards?" Abascal insisted, without lowering his tone: "Or was it to get rich and continue with that predatory party that is fiscally suffocating the Spaniards?"
The leader of the PP, for his part, has launched a global criticism of the scenario seen this last week regarding Adif, with two searches in its offices. "If the money for train security has ended up in the PSOE, or in the pockets of one of their own, it will not be enough for them to leave, they will have to respond to justice," Feijóo promised, adding: "And if they have stolen the money intended to protect the lives of Spaniards, they will have to leave power to go to jail."
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Judicial investigation into the use of funds in Adif.
Likely · Within weeks

After the poor Republican results in the midterm elections, the European extreme right distances itself from Donald Trump. Parties such as Brothers of Italy, National Regrouping and Vox try to disassociate themselves from his management, especially from the war in Iran.

US voters have backed restrictions on AI data centers in 40 municipalities, reflecting concerns about energy consumption. The phenomenon coincides with turbulence in the markets and increasing global cybersecurity incidents.

The Ministry of Social Security keeps early retirement files blocked for painful professions. Despite the regulations approved in 2025, no concessions have been implemented, affecting nearly two million workers.

The Spanish Government has paralyzed applications for early retirement in sectors with high accident rates, such as transport and construction, failing to meet the deadlines agreed with unions and employers two years ago.

Pedro Sánchez has urged massive electoral mobilization to prevent the PP and Vox from governing, comparing the Spanish right with international figures such as Trump or Milei and promising to protect rights such as abortion and pensions.

After the midterm elections, Florida remains a Republican stronghold, although with narrow margins of victory. Governor DeSantis and other leaders face internal and external criticism over the impact of immigration policies and the cost of living.