
General Court rules asset freezes and travel restrictions against the billionaire were justified following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
The EU's General Court rejected Roman Abramovich's challenge to sanctions, upholding asset freezes and travel restrictions imposed after Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
AI-generated summary
The EU imposed sanctions on Russian oligarchs following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, targeting individuals with significant capital in Russia.
The EU’s General Court has rejected Russian tycoon Roman Abramovich’s challenge to sanctions imposed on him following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, upholding asset freezes and travel restrictions against the billionaire.
The Council of the EU acted within its powers when it extended the measures against the billionaire former owner of Chelsea Football Club in 2022 through September 2025 and March 2026, judges ruled, according to a statement issued by the Court on Wednesday.
Abramovich, who holds Russian, Israeli and Portuguese nationality, is the majority shareholder in Evraz, one of Russia’s largest steel and mining groups. He also owns shares in Norilsk Nickel, a major producer of palladium and refined nickel.
The EU Court said the bloc's sanctions criteria were objective, sufficiently precise and proportionate. They target prominent businesspeople operating in Russia, particularly those active in sectors that provide significant revenue to the Russian government.
It dismissed Abramovich’s claim that the EU was targeting him because of his public profile, noting that sanctions were imposed on him because of his capital holding “and not, as he maintains, a desire to exploit him on account of his public notoriety,” the statement said.
Judges also rejected Abramovich’s argument that the measures were effectively decided by Council working groups rather than by EU governments directly. Even if those groups may have carried out preparatory work, the Council took the final decision, the Court said.
Restrictions therefore complied with EU law and the bloc’s Charter of Fundamental Rights, it said and proportionate to the objective of supporting a peaceful resolution to the war in Ukraine.
Abramovich may appeal to the Court of Justice of the EU within two months and 10 days from notification of the judgment.
He is also subject to sanctions in the U.K., where the government has sought to claim the proceeds of his sale of Chelsea Football Club.
The £2.5 billion is frozen in a bank account, where they have been since 2022, when the U.K. sanctioned Abramovich over his ties to Vladimir Putin.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Abramovich may appeal to the Court of Justice of the EU
Possible · Within months

The EU Court of Justice ruled that Vlaams Belang's anti-immigration campaign spoofing Ikea's branding may harm the furniture maker's reputation, favoring trademark rights over political parody.

Former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, asked a Manhattan federal judge to dismiss drug trafficking charges against them, citing foreign leader and sovereign immunity.

A 1634 Irish law banning third-party litigation funding is preventing non-profits from financing expensive class-action lawsuits against major tech firms. While the EU allows such actions, Ireland's unique restrictions create a barrier to collective redress.

TikTok has agreed to a $400 million settlement with the US Department of Justice to resolve allegations that the platform violated children's privacy laws by collecting data from users under 13 without parental permission.

Harvard University has agreed to pay $53 million to settle claims after a former morgue manager stole and sold donated body parts for medical research.

The US Supreme Court has declined to hear President Donald Trump's appeal to overturn an $83 million defamation verdict awarded to writer E. Jean Carroll, marking the second time the court has rejected his request regarding the case.