
AI-generated summary
The Court of Appeal of Milan had ordered the closure of the hot area of the Taranto steel plant. The commissioners of Ilva and Acciaierie d'Italia have appealed against this decision.
The judges of the United Civil Sections of the Court of Cassation reserved the right to decide on the appeals presented by the lawyers of the commissioners of Ilva in As and Acciaierie d'Italia in As against the decision of the Court of Appeal of Milan to stop the hot area of the Taranto steel plant.
During today's hearing, the general prosecutor's office at the Supreme Court asked to accept some of the reasons for the appeals presented, effectively asking not to proceed with the stop to the Taranto blast furnaces.
The decision of the supreme judges will be communicated to the parties in the next few days.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Communication of the Supreme Court's decision to the parties.
Very likely · Within days

The United Sections of the Supreme Court of Cassation are evaluating the appeal against the stop to the hot area of the former Ilva, ordered by the Court of Appeal of Milan due to health risks linked to dust and asbestos. The PG calls for a balance between health and industrial production.

The Supreme Court prosecutor asked for a new appeal trial for five policemen convicted in the Shalabayeva case. The request distinguishes the positions between the heads of Mobile and Immigration, invoking the prescription for the kidnapping of the mother.

The judges of the Supreme Court have reserved the right to decide on the appeals against the stop at the hot processing area of Ilva and Acciaierie d'Italia in Taranto. The general prosecutor's office asked to accept part of the appeals to avoid the shutdown of the blast furnaces.

The Supreme Court prosecutor asked for a new appeal process for the five policemen involved in the 2013 Shalabayeva case, distinguishing the positions between the Flying Squad and the Rome Immigration office.

Fabrizio Corona said he was not scared at the end of the first hearing of the 160 million euro civil case brought against him by Mediaset, Pier Silvio and Marina Berlusconi and various presenters for an alleged hate campaign.

The general advocate of the Supreme Court Luigi Birritteri criticized the decree of the Court of Appeal of Milan on the stop to the hot area of the former Ilva in Taranto for the lack of a balance between health and production.