
Ninety-nine fighters who laid down their arms face uncertainty as newly elected President Abelardo de la Espriella targets criminal groups.
Ninety-nine former Colombian guerrilla fighters who disarmed under former President Gustavo Petro's 'total peace' plan now face legal limbo and an uncertain future under newly elected President Abelardo de la Espriella.
AI-generated summary
Former President Gustavo Petro pursued a 'total peace' plan to disarm Colombia's criminal groups. Ninety-nine fighters disarmed before a presidential election won by Abelardo de la Espriella.
In mid-June, 99 guerrilla fighters were flown by helicopter to a small settlement in a rural area of southern Colombia where they lined up and, one by one, handed their weapons to government officials: rifles, pistols, machine guns and grenade launchers.
They also stripped off their heavy tactical vests, field packs and camouflage uniforms, which were each piled into a bonfire to mark the beginning of a new life away from an armed conflict that has claimed nearly half a million lives in the last six decades.
That was precisely what the former president Gustavo Petroâs âtotal peaceâ plan had sought to achieve: negotiating with and disarming all of Colombiaâs criminal groups, which are estimated to have nearly 30,000 members.
But the group of just 99 people was the only one to disarm, and did so just three days before the presidential runoff, which was won by the far-right millionaire lawyer Abelardo de la Espriella, who had campaigned on a promise to end âtotal peaceâ and return to a full-on strategy of jailing or killing criminals.
Now, several weeks after the new president took office â and amid efforts to deal with the aftermath of the 7.4-magnitude earthquake, as his government has already begun the promised airstrikes against criminal groups â the 99 do not know what will happen to them.
âWeâre in limbo,â said Natalia BrĂñez, 29, one of 13 women among the group staying in the temporary location zone, or ZUT by its Spanish initials, a government-controlled zone where, under surveillance and unable to leave, they were supposed to make the transition to civilian life over the following months.
The former guerrillas are housed in beige brick buildings decorated with drawings they painted themselves, including doves of peace, with a communal dining hall where three meals a day are served. No weapons are allowed inside and soldiers guard the ZUT from a perimeter less than a mile away.
One former combatant built a makeshift gym with weights made from metal pipes and tins filled with cement and sand, and there is an improvised football pitch, but most of them spend their days on their phones.
De la Espriella has repeatedly said his government will no longer negotiate peace agreements and has yet to announce what he intends to do regarding the people at the ZUT. The president has not responded to requests for comment.
In theory, any arrest warrants against the group are suspended, and they remain under state protection until 25 December, when Petroâs decree establishing the ZUT expires. But De la Espriella could revoke the decree at any time.
Armando Novoa, the former government official who led peace negotiations with the group, said âthe worst-case scenario would be for the new government to close the ZUT, launch a military operation and try to capture or kill them. That would be a crime against humanity, because these people are unarmed.â
Between 2 and 4 August, days before De la Espriellaâs inauguration, Novoa led journalists including the Guardian through the ZUT. The Office of the High Commissioner for Peace, where he worked, has since been absorbed into the newly created National Security Commission â a move expected to result in more than 200 job losses â and Novoa has resigned.
For now, at least, the ZUT remains in operation and has a small library run by BrĂñez, who has a phoenix tattoo on her left shoulder as a symbol of her rebirth away from the armed conflict.
âThe hardest thing for me has been being away from my children,â said BrĂñez, who has a seven-year-old daughter and a 10-year-old son and speaks to them on video calls, but will only be able to see them in person once her âtransitionâ is complete, a process that includes vocational training and psychosocial support.
They were also supposed to receive financial support of about ÂŁ425 a month, which had not yet been paid. In the meantime, some of them were planning to start a chicken-rearing business.
The 99 made up a small part of a group of about 1,000 combatants called Commandos of the Frontier â most of whom remain armed â and are part of the National Coordinator of the Bolivarian Army (CNEB), a former dissident faction of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Farc) with about 2,500 members which controls the border with Ecuador.
The Petro administration said negotiations were also under way with other members of the CNEB, who published an open letter addressed to De la Espriella saying they were willing to continue talks with him. It is not known whether the president responded.
The CNEBâs chief âpeace negotiatorâ, Geovany AndrĂ©s Rojas, known as âArañaâ (Spider), had been in custody since February under a US extradition request for drug trafficking, which Petro had delayed. Last Wednesday, De la Espriella ordered extradition.
Although such groups emerged in the 1960s as leftwing rebels fighting government abuses and seeking revolution â followed soon afterwards by far-right paramilitary groups â ideology has long since been overtaken for most of them by economic interests, above all drug trafficking (Colombia is the worldâs largest producer of cocaine) and illegal mining.
âHere in the ZUT, the vast majority were not in the group because of any ideological commitment, but for economic reasons,â said Novoa. âIt even surprised us that most of them simply called the group âthe companyâ.â
Petro repeatedly tried to negotiate peace agreements with larger groups. The armed factions took advantage of temporary ceasefires to continue expanding, a process that had already begun before he took office. They also clashed among themselves for control of territory and illicit economies, which many security experts say contributed to a rise in homicides, kidnappings and massacres.
âTotal peaceâ was an attempt to address what the landmark 2016 peace deal between the government and the Farc failed to resolve, as other armed groups and Farc dissidents remained active.
Petroâs administration failed to reduce violence, which instead reached its worst levels in a decade, and to reach the disarmament stage with any of the gangs, apart from the 99 former combatants â who handed over their weapons only on the eve of an election that every poll indicated the government-backed candidate would lose.
âThey [the government] told us: âIf this works, youâre opening the door for other groups and will set an example,ââ said BrĂñez.
Some security experts saw the agreement as rushed.
âIt was a somewhat irresponsible decision,â said Paula Tobo, a senior researcher at the thinktank Ideas for Peace Foundation, which published an extensive report on why Total Peace failed.
Tobo said the 99 were now in a âlegal limboâ because their protection rested on decrees that could be revoked and there is no legal framework for their transition to civilian life. All of the Petro administrationâs proposals to regulate surrenders failed in Congress and, under current law, anyone who has committed crimes such as kidnapping or drug trafficking is not eligible for amnesty.
âItâs positive that these people wanted to lay down their arms, but it really wasnât the right time for the government to take that decision ⊠The previous administration clearly put them at risk of this government suddenly deciding to abolish the ZUT and arrest them,â said Tobo.
The group wrote a letter to De la Espriella reaffirming its âirreversible decision to commit to peaceâ and inviting him to visit the ZUT. At the time of publication it had received no response.
The youngest member of the group, a 19-year-old who asked to be identified only as AdriĂĄn, said they wanted âto have a home, a familyâ.
However, he knows what he will do if things do not go according to plan. âHonestly, Iâd take up arms again, because weâre keeping our side of the bargain and the government should do the same, shouldnât it?â he said.
AI outlook â possibilities, not facts
President de la Espriella's decree regarding the temporary location zone expires on December 25.
Very likely · Within months

Prime Minister Burnham navigates fiscal rules, tax pledges, and economic turmoil following the Iran war, while delaying defense targets and facing crucial welfare reviews ahead of the budget.

Anti-asylum seeker protests in Thetford and RAF Barnham highlight local tensions over government plans to house asylum claimants in remote military sites, following months of unrest and riots.
President Donald Trump's son, Barron, is reportedly maintaining a low profile and staying reclusive due to Iran threats, assassination attempts on his father, and safety concerns.

Iceland holds a national referendum on whether to resume EU accession negotiations, with voters deciding on a simple yes/no question amid rising geopolitical tensions over Russia's war in Ukraine and Greenland, and concerns over fisheries policy, inflation, and national identity.

Icelanders head to the polls on Saturday to vote on whether to reopen EU accession negotiations, a decision influenced by rising living costs, currency volatility, Arctic security concerns due to Russia's actions and US rhetoric on Greenland, and fears over losing control of the fishing industry, with recent polls showing a near-even split.

Icelandic farmers like DavĂð Clausen PĂ©tursson express concern that EU accession talks could harm Iceland's farming sector by creating uncertainty and reducing profits, as the country prepares for a closely contested referendum on restarting EU membership negotiations, with polls showing a narrow lead for the 'no' campaign.