
A state court in Hesse ruled in favor of a Frankfurt man who sued Google over aerial images on Google Earth and Maps.
A Hesse state court ruled that Google violated a Frankfurt man's privacy by publishing aerial images of his property on Google Earth and Maps without consent, rejecting freedom of information justifications.
AI-generated summary
A Frankfurt man sued Google over privacy violations regarding aerial imagery published on Google Earth and Google Maps.
A state court in Hesse, Germany, has ruled in favor of a Frankfurt man who sued US tech giant Google over the publication of images on Google Earth and Google Maps that he argued invaded his privacy.
The man had previously sued to have images of his Frankfurt home and property scrubbed from Google's Street View site as well as from Apple Look Around.
Court finds privacy rights were violated
The court found that Google had infringed on the privacy of the man and his family by publishing aerial images of their property on Google Earth, saying: "Nobody must accept the worldwide publication of aerial images of their property without their consent, at least when concerning areas of a property hidden from public view."
"The plaintiff's personal space extends across the whole of the home's parcel. The only data to be gleaned here are personal, giving clues to private lifestyle, such as the size and design of the property. Beyond this, potential weak points in the property's security perimeter are also laid bare."
The court also accused Google of acquiring the images by "spying" because it does not notify property owners that their properties will be filmed.
The court additionally found that although Google says it contributes to the democratization of knowledge, it nevertheless has no right to invoke freedom of information to justify invading private spaces.
The ruling may still be appealed.
Edited by: Louis Oelofse
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Google may appeal the Hesse state court ruling.
Possible · Within weeks

Elon Musk and his America PAC have reached a settlement in two class-action lawsuits alleging fraud regarding a $1 million daily giveaway to voters in swing states during the 2024 US election cycle. The terms of the agreement remain undisclosed.

Russell Brand, 51, is on trial at Southwark Crown Court facing three counts of rape, three of sexual assault and one of indecent assault against six women between 1999 and 2009. Prosecutor Riel Karmy-Jones KC described him as a 'ruthless, calculated and manipulative predator' with an 'indiscriminate and voracious' desire for sexual contact. Two complainants have testified so far, describing feeling like a 'zombie' and encountering a 'wild-eyed maniac'. Brand denies all charges, claims some accounts were influenced by a 2023 documentary, and maintains his innocence while attending court with his wife and drawing on his Christian faith for comfort.

A New Mexico state judge dismissed child sexual abuse charges against actor Timothy Busfield, citing prosecutorial misconduct in grand jury proceedings, while noting new charges could be pursued; Busfield denied allegations of improperly touching twin boys on the set of The Cleaning Lady.

German courts, supported by ECJ rulings, are allowing gamblers to seek compensation for losses incurred on illegal online casinos and fruit machines between 2008 and 2021. The shift could trigger mass litigation against operators lacking German licenses.

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether a watchdog group can obtain information to determine if the defunct Department of Government Efficiency is subject to federal public records laws.

German courts following EU rulings indicate gamblers can seek loss compensation from operators who lacked German licenses while online gambling was banned.