Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood Claims Most Women Crossing Channel Have Been Raped
Quick Look
- Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood stated in a podcast interview that nearly all women attempting to reach the UK via small boats from northern France have been raped during their journey, citing criminal gangs controlling migrant crossings.
- She also condemned far-right activists, defended the ban on Palestine Action, and acknowledged discomfort over arrests of pro-Palestinian activists, while emphasizing the need to uphold principles even when personally difficult.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The UK has seen a rise in small boat crossings from northern France, prompting political debate over border security and asylum policy. The government has introduced new safe routes but maintained restrictions on family reunion visas, which critics say disproportionately affect women and children. Shabana Mahmood, as Home Secretary, oversees immigration and border enforcement, and has previously expressed support for pro-Palestinian causes.
Nearly all women who try to reach the UK in small boats from northern France have been raped on their journey, Shabana Mahmood has claimed.
In an interview with The Rest Is Politics podcast, the home secretary said far-right, balaclava-wearing activists would “kill” or “kick me out of my own country” if they took power.
Speaking to the former Tory minister Rory Stewart and Tony Blair’s former close adviser Alastair Campbell, she said sexual abusers would exploit most asylum seekers as long as traffickers continued to decide who came to the UK.
She said: “We’re not in control of this border. The sifting of the people that end up in the north of France and are about to get on a dinghy is done by criminal gangs who are also, by the way, people traffickers.
“You can almost guarantee that every woman that’s in the north of France has probably been raped along the journey. Some of the men too, they’ve certainly been abused and threatened. That is not the model that should decide whether somebody gets to come to the UK, make this their place of sanctuary and ultimately become one of us.”
Asked by Campbell about balaclava-wearing protesters shutting down ports and praising her policies, she said they should “sod off”.
She added: “They’re just troublemakers. You know, they’d kill me in a minute if they could, and they’d definitely kick me out of my own country. So let’s just be really clear about who and what they are. They don’t think I’m a true Brit and they hate the fact that I’m a Muslim.”
Mahmood also said she considered herself “part of the pro-Palestinian cause” and felt “very uncomfortable” over the arrests of activists opposing the ban imposed on Palestine Action.
Merseyside police arrested 82 people on Monday at the Labour party conference on suspicion of wearing or carrying articles supporting a proscribed organisation.
In a protest organised by Defend Our Juries, scores of people sat outside the conference centre in Liverpool, many holding handmade banners saying they supported Palestine Action.
Mahmood said: “For those of us who have been in the pro-Palestinian cause all of our lives, these are people – sometimes you’ll know who they are, you know, you’ve been on the marches with them – it feels very uncomfortable to see them falling foul of section 13 of the Terrorism Act.”
However, she defended enforcing the ban, regardless of her views: “You’ve got to be able to apply your principles, even when it’s uncomfortable for you, because you’re going to really want to apply them when it’s something you, you know, with your whole heart, are feeling very passionately about.”
Authorities were preparing on Sunday for the arrival of a migrant dinghy heading for the south coast. The boat was being shadowed by French coastguard and rescue vessels and moving toward the Channel boundary line, according to ship tracking data.
It appeared to have set off from near the Utah Beach area of Normandy on Sunday morning.
Caroline Dinenage, the Conservative MP for Gosport in Hampshire, said there was “nothing to suggest” the boat would land on the county’s coast but police were “making preparations should that situation change”.
A government spokesperson said: “The Border Security Command works around the clock to monitor the Channel and protect our border. It is vital we continue to detain, check and process every small boat arrival.”
Imran Hussain, a director at the Refugee Council, welcomed the home secretary’s acknowledgment of widespread sexual violence, but questioned why the government had closed safe and legal routes which could help asylum seekers avoid falling into the hands of predators.
“We know from our services that women and girls fleeing war and persecution face sexual violence both in the conflicts they have escaped and on the journeys they are forced to make in search of safety,” he said.
“That is why in welcoming the government’s announcement last week of new safe routes we called for them not to be limited to a few hundred people. Last year the government closed family reunion, the safe route for refugees which overwhelmingly benefits women and children.
“It is entirely right to talk about the dangers women face on these journeys but we should not be closing the safe routes that could keep them out of harm’s way. Protecting women means more safe routes, not fewer.”
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The government will face increasing pressure to expand safe and legal routes for asylum seekers following public criticism over sexual violence risks.
Likely · Within months
Legal challenges may arise regarding the application of terrorism laws to pro-Palestinian activists, particularly if arrests continue at political events.
Possible · Within months
Open Questions
- What evidence supports the claim that nearly all women crossing have been raped?
- How many small boat arrivals have occurred recently, and what proportion involve women?
- What specific measures is the government taking to combat criminal gangs facilitating crossings?
- How will the government balance enforcing the Palestine Action ban with protecting civil liberties?






